Your post attempts to criticise BITCOIN on
[...]
I like the inclusion of your logical fallacy section, and also your final section and the beginning 4 () points are good too, but I think
( ) Your argument uses certain terms INCORRECTLY. These words/concepts have a specific meaning but you obviously don't know what it is.
( ) Your arguments/conclusions are incorrect due to BAD INPUT DATA.
( ) Your arguments/conclusions are flawed due to BAD PROCESSING.
Isn't great because it's sounds slightly emotional / arrogant rather than logical / reasonable. I think we need a benevolent, friendly tone to the whole thing, don't you? If two sides are arguing, the side that is getting the least emotional always looks like the winner!