Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2019, 10:33:59 AM *
News: 10th anniversary art contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: History Repeats Itself  (Read 1774 times)
Alex Thornton
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 08:28:18 PM
 #1

I was reading Money A History edited by Jonathan Williams today for fun. This passage on 17th century goldsmiths first lending against their gold deposits stood out (my emphasis in bold):

Quote from: Money A History
In 1676 an anonymous pamphlet was published on the Mystery of the New Fashioned Goldsmiths or Bankers. The writer deplored the goldsmiths’ move into the ‘unlawful practices’ of lending money at high rates of interest, claiming that they would charge double or treble interest for discounting bills of exchange, according to whether ‘they found The Merchant more or less pinched’. Such men surely could not be trusted, and the writer hoped that ‘people will suddenly come to their wits, and begin to examine why a Goldsmith-banker should be better Security than another man, or fitter to be trusted for ten times more than he is worth…

So the modern advent of paper lending initially received a great deal of backlash. Sound familiar?
1571567639
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571567639

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571567639
Reply with quote  #2

1571567639
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 20, 2013, 01:56:29 AM
 #2

I was reading Money A History edited by Jonathan Williams today for fun. This passage on 17th century goldsmiths first lending against their gold deposits stood out (my emphasis in bold):

Quote from: Money A History
In 1676 an anonymous pamphlet was published on the Mystery of the New Fashioned Goldsmiths or Bankers. The writer deplored the goldsmiths’ move into the ‘unlawful practices’ of lending money at high rates of interest, claiming that they would charge double or treble interest for discounting bills of exchange, according to whether ‘they found The Merchant more or less pinched’. Such men surely could not be trusted, and the writer hoped that ‘people will suddenly come to their wits, and begin to examine why a Goldsmith-banker should be better Security than another man, or fitter to be trusted for ten times more than he is worth…

So the modern advent of paper lending initially received a great deal of backlash. Sound familiar?
It is a pity, Bitcoin hadn't been invented back then, those gold smiths wouldn't have had any leverage.

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1013


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2013, 02:25:40 AM
 #3

I was reading Money A History edited by Jonathan Williams today for fun. This passage on 17th century goldsmiths first lending against their gold deposits stood out (my emphasis in bold):

Quote from: Money A History
In 1676 an anonymous pamphlet was published on the Mystery of the New Fashioned Goldsmiths or Bankers. The writer deplored the goldsmiths’ move into the ‘unlawful practices’ of lending money at high rates of interest, claiming that they would charge double or treble interest for discounting bills of exchange, according to whether ‘they found The Merchant more or less pinched’. Such men surely could not be trusted, and the writer hoped that ‘people will suddenly come to their wits, and begin to examine why a Goldsmith-banker should be better Security than another man, or fitter to be trusted for ten times more than he is worth…

So the modern advent of paper lending initially received a great deal of backlash. Sound familiar?

Nope, Bitcoin can not be inflated like that.   Sounds like we have a major improvement in some respects Smiley.

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 22, 2013, 07:03:04 PM
 #4

Indeed!!!

We don't need anyone playing the bank.
Nor can anyone lend bitcoins that are not there!!!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!