pawel7777 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1617
|
|
May 14, 2016, 10:59:06 PM |
|
After Bangladesh Central Bank $81m cyberheist in Feb, it happened again, details are not disclosed but according to Swift, the victim this time was some commercial bank. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/13/second-bank-hit-by-sophisticated-malware-attack-says-swifthttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-13/swift-warns-of-new-hacker-attack-on-bank-after-bangladesh-heisthttps://www.swift.com/insights/press-releases/swift-customer-communication_customer-security-issuesAnd some thoughts on how will it affect current system and whether or not Bitcoin/blockchain could be a game changers: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3975082-swift-hacked-bitcoin-blockchain-fat-lady-sings... The party is over for the old, permissioned, firewall based, electronic fortress, concept of trust-in-payments systems. And the alternative is very far from obvious.
The buzzwords, the sweethearts of the fintech movement, are systems known as distributed ledgers. Two words are about to become part of everyone's vocabulary: Bitcoin and blockchain. There are multitudes of manifestations of these two intimately related electronic phenomena. If you are new to the subject of Bitcoin and blockchain, the learning curve is steep.
The significance of the second Swift failure is this. Trust-based systems, such as those upon which the current payments systems operate, are becoming more expensive to protect at a rapidly increasing rate. The horse race between hackers and firewall builders is being won by hackers in spite of the rapidly increasing spending on internet security.
And these most recent hacks took bank's money, not customer money. That is a game changer. ... The point of the article is this. Now that the bank's own money is being stolen, the financial world will be singing from one hymnal. The time of distributed ledgers is here. There is no longer a question that distributed ledgers will replace our current method of securing transactions. The firewall system no longer has a constituency after the Swift debacle.
What are the implications for investors? First, there is nothing yet you can invest in directly. It is possible to purchase a thing called a crypto-currency. The most prominent of these is called Bitcoin. However, unless you spend the necessary months of research to grasp the underlying determinants of the value of Bitcoin, I have an emphatic one-word recommendation. Don't. This investment is incredibly risky, and those who provide confident forecasts of its future value are deluded or worse. ...
|
| | Peach BTC bitcoin | │ | Buy and Sell Bitcoin P2P | │ | . .
▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀
▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀ | | EUROPE | AFRICA LATIN AMERICA | | | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
███████▄█ ███████▀ ██▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄ █████████████▀ ▐███████████▌ ▐███████████▌ █████████████▄ ██████████████ ███▀███▀▀███▀ | . Download on the App Store | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
▄██▄ ██████▄ █████████▄ ████████████▄ ███████████████ ████████████▀ █████████▀ ██████▀ ▀██▀ | . GET IT ON Google Play | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ |
|
|
|
Evildrum
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
May 14, 2016, 11:04:06 PM |
|
In both cases Swift said insiders or cyber attackers had succeeded in penetrating the targeted banks’ systems, obtaining user credentials and submitting fraudulent Swift messages that correspond with transfers of money. If I am a bank right now I would be extremely worried what the future is going to look like if they do not introduce some fail safes soon. We could be looking at these attacks manifesting in large attacks over multiple banks all at once. Could cripple the system and cause panic in a very rapid order of events. Scary.
|
|
|
|
Bit_Happy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
|
|
May 14, 2016, 11:24:33 PM |
|
In both cases Swift said insiders or cyber attackers had succeeded in penetrating the targeted banks’ systems, obtaining user credentials and submitting fraudulent Swift messages that correspond with transfers of money. If I am a bank right now I would be extremely worried what the future is going to look like if they do not introduce some fail safes soon. We could be looking at these attacks manifesting in large attacks over multiple banks all at once. Could cripple the system and cause panic in a very rapid order of events. Scary. Scary times 81M: I heard about this on the radio, and do not understand why there is not already more panic?
|
|
|
|
btcjoin14
|
|
May 14, 2016, 11:38:49 PM |
|
They obviously need better protection and start getting prepared if it happens again. They probably won't stop until they fix it. This could lead to a lot of panic from them.
|
|
|
|
mkc
|
|
May 15, 2016, 05:56:02 AM |
|
Holy cow,I did not know about attack in Feb. I thought central bank is safe, much safer than my account in lousy bank. Can central bank reverse the transaction, I mean, hacker can not take 800 million cash from bank and disappear, is it? So the receiving bank will have to reverse the transaction.
|
|
|
|
Pursuer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
|
|
May 15, 2016, 06:38:14 AM |
|
i think it mostly shows that Bangladesh banking system is made of incompetent people who has to be changed. $81 million the first time and who knows how much this time is not a small amount. and the repeat shows they really don't know what they are doing.
|
Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
SFR10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 3486
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
May 15, 2016, 07:08:41 AM |
|
Although this is a bad news, specially for banks themselves since their own money was hacked and not customers money but there's a wake up call of a need to change the way everything has been operating, simple due to the fact that this is the second time so clearly someone didn't do their job to the extent they supposed to do and that's whoever was involved with implementation of security levels. Regarding BTCitcoin and blockchain possible role, the author seem to be much on the negative side of BTCitcoin and rather gives the conclusion that blockchain is the better solution so can't agree with him on many points.
|
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
May 21, 2016, 08:00:39 PM |
|
No issue for the banks, as this was only done on the IT side of things and they can simply reverse the transaction order... But this is definitely a nice thing for Bitcoin. Laws of math protect us, banks are on their own...
|
|
|
|
nanonymousx
|
|
May 21, 2016, 08:09:20 PM |
|
Feel like bank is safer, since there are two characteristics about Bitcoin doesn't have:
1 Bank knows the name of the customers. 2 Bank can reverse the transaction.
I know there are many Bitcoin lovers here, what is your take on this?
|
|
|
|
pawel7777 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1617
|
|
May 21, 2016, 08:41:35 PM |
|
No issue for the banks, as this was only done on the IT side of things and they can simply reverse the transaction order...
No they cannot just undo the transaction once it's settled. Maybe if the hack was immediately detected, but that wasn't a case.
|
| | Peach BTC bitcoin | │ | Buy and Sell Bitcoin P2P | │ | . .
▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀
▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀ | | EUROPE | AFRICA LATIN AMERICA | | | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
███████▄█ ███████▀ ██▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄ █████████████▀ ▐███████████▌ ▐███████████▌ █████████████▄ ██████████████ ███▀███▀▀███▀ | . Download on the App Store | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
▄██▄ ██████▄ █████████▄ ████████████▄ ███████████████ ████████████▀ █████████▀ ██████▀ ▀██▀ | . GET IT ON Google Play | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ |
|
|
|
Shiroslullaby
|
|
May 21, 2016, 10:30:02 PM |
|
I heard something about the Bangladesh heist that they were investigating some bank officials, that it may have been an inside job. Even if it was not, some institutions have outdated equipment, old code that needs to be reviewed. And no matter how secure you are, someone can always get info through social engineering, spear phishing email campaigns, etc. Its really amazing that you can make these transfers without some form of 2FA authentication.
|
|
|
|
mixan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
TRUMP IS DOING THE BEST! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
|
|
May 21, 2016, 10:39:53 PM |
|
Things like this make bitcoin look less secure for the usual person to be less likely to want to do anything with bitcoin. I for one if I heard about what happened in 2015 would of turned away from bitcoin thinking that it was not safe to use.
|
The parasite hates three things: free markets, free will, and free men.
|
|
|
mcduff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2016, 03:42:49 AM |
|
SWIFT is nothing more than a standardised messaging system let's not forget.
Think of it as (supposedly) secure email.
These days bank payment systems used by companies require a second factor. If I'm not mistaken, swift does not require this. But surely it must be coming then, it's quite an antiquated system.
I don't think this gives more power to bitcoin what has happened here.
What I don't understand is how the hackers can get a BIC code. You normally need to be vetted and authorised to get one and therefore receive money. No Tom, Dick or Harry can get their own BIC.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinpro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 22, 2016, 04:52:51 AM |
|
Ether is like the magical helper of Bitcoin
|
WWW.FACEBOOK.COM
CRYPTOCURRENCY CENTRAL BANK
LTC: LP7bcFENVL9vdmUVea1M6FMyjSmUfsMVYf
|
|
|
Hirose UK
|
|
May 23, 2016, 04:05:48 AM |
|
What are the implications for investors? First, there is nothing yet you can invest in directly. It is possible to purchase a thing called a crypto-currency. The most prominent of these is called Bitcoin. However, unless you spend the necessary months of research to grasp the underlying determinants of the value of Bitcoin, I have an emphatic one-word recommendation. Don't . This investment is incredibly risky, and those who provide confident forecasts of its future value are deluded or worse. every investment has risks, but I found many people already got profit investing on bitcoin.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
nanonymousx
|
|
May 28, 2016, 06:11:11 AM |
|
SWIFT is nothing more than a standardised messaging system let's not forget.
Think of it as (supposedly) secure email.
These days bank payment systems used by companies require a second factor. If I'm not mistaken, swift does not require this. But surely it must be coming then, it's quite an antiquated system.
I don't think this gives more power to bitcoin what has happened here.
What I don't understand is how the hackers can get a BIC code. You normally need to be vetted and authorised to get one and therefore receive money. No Tom, Dick or Harry can get their own BIC.
It seems you have some insight into SWIFT, what is BIC code? Is it some thing like password? Thanks
|
|
|
|
mki8
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2016, 09:57:22 AM |
|
stuff like this do not affect banks that much, as fiat is only debt
the banks can easily just write this off, as fiat is not backed by anything.
Just think of all the fraud that goes on daily, the banks just write all that off on a daily basis.
|
|
|
|
mki8
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2016, 10:01:38 AM |
|
What I don't understand is how the hackers can get a BIC code. You normally need to be vetted and authorised to get one and therefore receive money. No Tom, Dick or Harry can get their own BIC.
when you reach 16 and have a normal adult account and you start making international transfers, you will find you have no idea about BIC Bank Identification Code you might want to look at: http://www.theswiftcodes.com/which has all BIC's for all banks worldwide please, stop talking dribble if you dont know what you are talking about, theres already way too much dribble in these forums
|
|
|
|
sakinaka
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Decentralised Amazon & ICO Hub
|
|
May 28, 2016, 10:27:53 AM |
|
If a bank is stolen, how does it relates to Bitcoin ? Except if some bitcoins were stolen, I don't see.
|
|
|
|
|