[WTS]Crypto Imperator Bitcoin Halving Commemorative Coin, Sold Out!

[CryptoImperator]

Can we see a photo of the back?

Soon

[chronicsky]

One last thing!
are these going to be funded???

I'd prefer if atleast non gold plated are Unfunded

[Lutpin]

One last thing! Are these going to be funded???

According to them a little earlier in this thread, all coins are supposed to be (going to be) funded:

Is funding required?

We have been thinking about this, and we would like to fund all the coins, to accomplish the "block reward" when adding all of them

(That's another 0.125 on top of the coin prize.)

[CryptoImperator]

One last thing! Are these going to be funded???

According to them a little earlier in this thread, all coins are supposed to be (going to be) funded:

Is funding required?

We have been thinking about this, and we would like to fund all the coins, to accomplish the "block reward" when adding all of them

(That's another 0.125 on top of the coin prize.)

We are considering the following:

Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.

Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

[TheNewAnon135246]

One last thing! Are these going to be funded???

According to them a little earlier in this thread, all coins are supposed to be (going to be) funded:

Is funding required?

We have been thinking about this, and we would like to fund all the coins, to accomplish the "block reward" when adding all of them

(That's another 0.125 on top of the coin prize.)

We are considering the following:

Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.

Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

Will #26 - 100 be different minted coins (since the front says 0.125 BTC)?

[Lutpin]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

[wttbs]

#100 for me please

[Lincoln6Echo]

I think you are not quite consistent regarding this Halving Coin. Instead of full price you should take half the price.

[CryptoImperator]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Thats right, looks that by popular demand, 1-25 should be sold funded. And 26-100 unfunded, that way the theoretical sum is still 12.5 BTC

[TheNewAnon135246]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Thats right, looks that by popular demand, 1-25 should be sold funded. And 26-100 unfunded, that way the theoretical sum is still 12.5 BTC

Or stick with the original idea (all coins funded with 0.125 ). This coin is based on the Block Halving so small details like that are exactly what makes a coin great.

[CryptoImperator]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Thats right, looks that by popular demand, 1-25 should be sold funded. And 26-100 unfunded, that way the theoretical sum is still 12.5 BTC

Or stick with the original idea (all coins funded with 0.125 ). This coin is based on the Block Halving so small details like that are exactly what makes a coin great.

Nothing is decided yet, so all opinions are welcome, yes, we felt that it was kinda cool to have all coins funded

[hybridsole]

I'll take #16 please

[montreal]

Please reserve me #17 thanks

[chronicsky]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Thats right, looks that by popular demand, 1-25 should be sold funded. And 26-100 unfunded, that way the theoretical sum is still 12.5 BTC

Or stick with the original idea (all coins funded with 0.125 ). This coin is based on the Block Halving so small details like that are exactly what makes a coin great.

Nothing is decided yet, so all opinions are welcome, yes, we felt that it was kinda cool to have all coins funded

Though would prefer the 26-100 as unfunded but all upto you!
The BTC isn't going anywhere but with me anyway

[nathansenn]

Would like to reserve #64

[TommyBitcoin]

I'd like to reserve #20 please if that is available. 

[TommyBitcoin]

By the way, I think it's a cool idea.  I think that you have to do something with the gold plating to denote the whole "halving theme".  I like both ideas of either 1 side gold plated or one half of the surface gold plated.  It seems that the latter would be more rad, but much harder to pull off.

I am not sure whether the coin should be funded or not.  To the people who don't want it funded, is it because a good scammer could redeem it and sell it as funded?  I personally like the funded part of it, but if there is something I am missing, can someone please explain? 

Either way, it is a cool coin.  I like the halving theme.  It looks to be a really nice commemorative piece 

[bitenvy]

We are considering the following:
Coins #1-#25 have to be funded with 0.125 each.
Coins #26-#100 funded with 0.0125

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Thats right, looks that by popular demand, 1-25 should be sold funded. And 26-100 unfunded, that way the theoretical sum is still 12.5 BTC

Or stick with the original idea (all coins funded with 0.125 ). This coin is based on the Block Halving so small details like that are exactly what makes a coin great.

Nothing is decided yet, so all opinions are welcome, yes, we felt that it was kinda cool to have all coins funded

I like/vote for all funded 0.125BTC x 100 coins = 12.5BTC.

[greenplastic]

Nice design/idea on this coin. Different & fitting as well.

Would like to reserve #23 & #77, if available. Thanks!

I vote 'funded' too. 

[CryptoImperator]

Nice design/idea on this coin. Different & fitting as well.

Would like to reserve #23 & #77, if available. Thanks!

I vote 'funded' too. 

#77 already reserved via PM, would you like another number?