Unified ASICMINER orderbook

[ineededausername]

I've seen quite a few auctions now; might be time to put up an informal orderbook with binding but withdrawable bids/asks.

Directions
(1) Minimum quantity for bid/ask is 50 as of March 2, 2013.  This is to prevent overcrowding.
(2) Withdraw orders that are filled.  These are binding.
(3) No discussion except for orders, quoting orders, and rule suggestions.
(4) Format for posts is (withdraw (id)) | ((bid|ask) (amount)@(price)) (ex. bid 100@0.5 or withdraw id 54)
(5) PM me to fill/create anonymous orders.


Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
25	nanopene	10000	0.10
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
10	Goat	2000	0.25
11	zefir	2000	0.35
40	luffy	50	0.36
44	Vezunchik	100	0.41
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
26	Franktank	50	0.4825
39	Goat	100	0.50
47	btcash	100	0.512821
Bids
----
Asks
38	bremer-btc-user	156	0.512821
36	justanickname	50	0.60
33	creativex	250	0.649
29	DutchBrat	585	0.65
11	zefir	1000	0.70
27	xkrikl	500	0.80
10	Goat	900	0.90
15	kibblesnbits	100	0.90
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00

[ianbakewell]

ask 100@1.0

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

bid 90@0.45

[ineededausername]

ask 100@1.0

bid 90@0.45

Everything north of post 3 quoted and updated.

[msm595]

bid 10@.47

[JordanL]

bid 200 @ BTC0.435

[ineededausername]

bid 10@.47

ask 200 @ BTC0.435

Quoted and updated.

[JordanL]

bid 10@.47

ask 200 @ BTC0.435

Quoted and updated.

I'm sorry, I misspoke. I am buying, not selling. Post edited.

[ineededausername]

bid 200 @ BTC0.435

Updated

[El Cabron]

Sell 900 @ .9

Buy 2000 @ .25

[zefir]

No discussion, but a proposal: to not flood friedcat with transactions of single shares, I suggest limiting trades to a minimum block size (e.g. 25, 50 or 100).

bid 2000 @ 0.35
ask 1000 @ 0.70

[wisard]

Sell 100 @ 0.895
Buy 100 @ 0.44
Buy 50 @ 0.48

[MPOE-PR]

Wow, two of these?

I've seen quite a few auctions now; might be time to put up an informal orderbook with binding but withdrawable bids/asks.

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
5	msm595	10	0.47
Bids
----
Asks
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00

Format for posts is

(withdraw (id)) | ((bid|ask) (amount)@(price))
ex. bid 100@0.5 or withdraw id 54

Please withdraw filled orders.

You may PM me for anonymous orderbook updates, and trades will be routed through my inbox.  You may fill an anonymous order by PMing me.

No other posts, such as discussion of the price or discussion of updates, should be made.
Exception: Quoting a bid/ask that has not been quoted yet.

I put up an example low-ball bid.

Friedcat, see what you're forcing people to do? Why?

[El Cabron]

Wow, two of these?

I've seen quite a few auctions now; might be time to put up an informal orderbook with binding but withdrawable bids/asks.

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
5	msm595	10	0.47
Bids
----
Asks
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00

Format for posts is

(withdraw (id)) | ((bid|ask) (amount)@(price))
ex. bid 100@0.5 or withdraw id 54

Please withdraw filled orders.

You may PM me for anonymous orderbook updates, and trades will be routed through my inbox.  You may fill an anonymous order by PMing me.

No other posts, such as discussion of the price or discussion of updates, should be made.
Exception: Quoting a bid/ask that has not been quoted yet.

I put up an example low-ball bid.

Friedcat, see what you're forcing people to do? Why?

GLBSE duh...

[kibblesnbits]

Ask 100 @ .90

[kibblesnbits]

Friedcat, see what you're forcing people to do? Why?

I'd rather see the ASICMINER people work on hashing equipment than trading platforms.

[ThickAsThieves]

Friedcat, see what you're forcing people to do? Why?

I'd rather see the ASICMINER people work on hashing equipment than trading platforms.

+1, +1

[MPOE-PR]

Friedcat, see what you're forcing people to do? Why?

I'd rather see the ASICMINER people work on hashing equipment than trading platforms.

Me too. Or, to quote,

It's by now impractical for any serious company contemplating being listed in BTC to forego the significant capital available on MPEx in order to favor a different venue (in fact, the cost of doing so can be calculated on the basis of the volume difference, and is in any case significant) for a variety of reasons, and certainly such an attempt would imply the modification of said company to include "being an exchange", which requires rare and valuable skills (programming notably NOT being one of them) and other human capital. Such an effort necessarily spells a movement away from said corp's core mission, whatever it may be (*).

A willingness to move away from the core mission, a cavalier attitude towards incurring costs and foregoing benefits all work together to paint a very unflattering picture in the eye of the discerning investor (If these people have any confidence in their business, why are they working on moving away from it to do something else? If they have the capital to pursue reinventing the wheel, why do they need my investment? If they're not interested in cashing in now why should I expect they ever will get my shares dividends?) and rapidly the convergence effects become very strong indeed.

* To quote Buffet,

Concluding this little dissertation on acquisitions, I can't resist repeating a tale told me last year by a corporate executive. The business he grew up in was a fine one, with a long-time record of leadership in its industry. Its main product, however, was distressingly glamorless. So several decades ago, the company hired a management consultant who  -naturally - advised diversification, the then-current fad. ("Focus" was not yet in style.) Before long, the company acquired a number of businesses, each after the consulting firm had gone through a long - and expensive - acquisition study. And the outcome? Said the executive sadly, "When we started, we were getting 100% of our earnings from the original business. After ten years, we were getting 150%."

[ineededausername]

Sell 900 @ .9

Buy 2000 @ .25

10

No discussion, but a proposal: to not flood friedcat with transactions of single shares, I suggest limiting trades to a minimum block size (e.g. 25, 50 or 100).

bid 2000 @ 0.35
ask 1000 @ 0.70

11

Sell 100 @ 0.895
Buy 100 @ 0.44
Buy 50 @ 0.48

12

Ask 100 @ .90

15

[John (John K.)]

I suggest doing this in the auction subforum as the posts cannot be altered there.