Unified ASICMINER orderbook

[Vezunchik]

Oh no, again...
Ask 50 @ 1.19

[22naru]

buy 100@0.62

[MarkyRamone]

Buy 33 @ 0.62

[Vezunchik]

missed #79 and #83 corrections.

[zefir]

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
25	nanopene	10000	0.10
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
10	Goat	2000	0.25
11	zefir	2000	0.35
40	luffy	50	0.36
44	Vezunchik	100	0.41
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
83	Vezunchik	50	0.46
53	ineededausername	64	0.50
72	superbit	50	0.51
76	Goat	1000	0.55
73	HorseRider	150	0.55
87	Franktank	50	0.60
85	btcash	100	0.60
81	wisard	50	0.60
86	romerun	200	0.615
102	22naru	100	0.62
98	bitcad	50	0.62
Bids
----
Asks
94	gsan	800	0.72
92	zefir	400	0.75
15	kibblesnbits	100	0.90
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00
95	xkrikl	500	1.10
101	Vezunchik	50	1.19
89	Goat	500	1.20

Invalid Orders: 103

[rudrigorc2]

Buy 200 @ 0.62

[Vezunchik]

Updating "83   Vezunchik   50   0.46"
to 50 @ 0.51

[MarkyRamone]

Buy 30 @ 0.62
(whats wrong with my bid? please help me)

[DutchBrat]

Buy 30 @ 0.62
(whats wrong with my bid? please help me)

Minimum qty is 50... see the amended rules

[SebastianJu]

Buy 168@0.62345678
And i want an escrow that gets my money, then the shares are transferred and when friedcat says ok then the escrow is releasing the btc and gets paid a fee from me. Did someone be an escrow before and is trustworthy enough so that buyer and seller can trust him enough?

By the way... i think the first post in thread should show the actual prices. So its not needed to post it again and again in the thread. I already mistook the first post as the real orderbook.

[zefir]

Buy 30 @ 0.62
(whats wrong with my bid? please help me)

Sent you a PM explaining you maybe missed:

Hi,

you put again an invalid quote in the ASICMINER orderbook thread. Quotes need to be multiples of 50 shares, as stated in the OP.

[JordanL]

50 @ BTC .62

[JordanL]

My above post is a bid.

[zefir]

Buy 168@0.62345678
And i want an escrow that gets my money, then the shares are transferred and when friedcat says ok then the escrow is releasing the btc and gets paid a fee from me. Did someone be an escrow before and is trustworthy enough so that buyer and seller can trust him enough?

By the way... i think the first post in thread should show the actual prices. So its not needed to post it again and again in the thread. I already mistook the first post as the real orderbook.

Posts in the auction sub-forum can not be edited to keep a non-deniable track of binding quotes. That's why I am updating the states regularly.

[zefir]

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
25	nanopene	10000	0.10
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
10	Goat	2000	0.25
11	zefir	2000	0.35
40	luffy	50	0.36
44	Vezunchik	100	0.41
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
53	ineededausername	64	0.50
107	Vezunchik	50	0.51
72	superbit	50	0.51
76	Goat	1000	0.55
73	HorseRider	150	0.55
87	Franktank	50	0.60
85	btcash	100	0.60
81	wisard	50	0.60
86	romerun	200	0.615
112	BlackLilac	50	0.62
106	rudrigorc2	200	0.62
102	22naru	100	0.62
98	bitcad	50	0.62
110	SebastianJu	168	0.62345678
Bids
----
Asks
94	gsan	800	0.72
92	zefir	400	0.75
15	kibblesnbits	100	0.90
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00
95	xkrikl	500	1.10
101	Vezunchik	50	1.19
89	Goat	500	1.20

Invalid Orders:

[zefir]

Notes

1) I first wanted to refuse SebastianJu's quote, but after re-checking the rules in the OP I realized ineededausername stated them not precisely enough. I initially proposed to have a minimum unit size to ease friedcat's manual database updates. Now rule 1 states a minimum quantity of 50, but this can be interpreted differently, arguing that a quote for 51 shares is ok while 49 is not. Not going to change the rules now, but in your own interest please try to keep the transactions block based.

2) Same goes for the pricing: there is no rule on increments, at the same time placing quotes up to Satoshis does not help you much, while it imposes a higher risk to be mis-typed or wrongly copy-pasted. Please try to limit yourself and whenever possible quote prices in full Bitcents (N * 0.01).

3) the binding character of your quotes seems to be worth a clarification (have been asked for in PM): posts in the auction sub-forum are binding (and therefore immutable). If you post a quote that is executable within the current orderbook, you enter a binding agreement. If the other party refuses to process the trade, you can report him to moderators and file a request for tagging him as scammer. As in other auction platforms, if a quote is obviously erroneous (like best ask is 0.72 and someone posts an ask for 0.07) it can be invalidated ex post. This relies on all participants to have some sort of common sense and fairness, but since we are all sane folks this should be no problem.

4) re escrow: this is to be decided and processed mutually by the trading parties. No need to state that your quote is dependent on escrow (which should be standard anyhow).


Thanks for your support

[kaerf]

ask 50 @ 0.65

[SebastianJu]

zefir... you state escrow is standard anyhow but i didnt find a hint here who offers such escrow service and maybe did this in a good manner in the past already. Can you give infos about who to contact?

The number of shares is because i now own a number of shares that isnt a round number and i want to change this. Its good that its possible and i think at some point it will happen anyway when an offer isnt fully fulfilled. I guess friedcat will calculate with calculator anyway because the values moved arent small. At least i wouldnt risk an error at that point.

And i would raise my offer to Buy 168 @ 0.64 using bitcent...

[kaerf]

withdraw id 117 (50 @ 0.65)

[JaredR26]

Buy 150 @ 0.72 (from gsan)