Mobile phones and cancer.

[Vika NSFW]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

[1714963281]

1714963281

[1714963281]

1714963281

[honglien]

No, they don't.

The amount of known cancer cases haven't changed significantly since the seventies actually. But mobile phone usage has increased by several billion since the start of the nineties. If mobile phones would cause cancer somehow then this would be incredibly easy to see in the amount of reported cancer cases.

[neochiny]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

i dont see how humans will be affected by this, humans and rats has a very different immune system.
but im sure theyre just testing the possibilities of what other things can cause cancerous tumors.
in the end humans will get a benefit of this research.

[Vika NSFW]

http://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/ethics/cellphone-radiation-causes-cancer-in-rats

[maku]

I guess even if the info about cellphones causing cancer will be definitely confirmed some people will still claim that it is not true.
People are so addicted to their cellphones and smartphones that they forgot how life was without them.

They won't give up on cellphones even it that might kill them.

[butragenjo]

I read in other board when mobile phones not rise any cancer,experiment made by australian specialists

[Vika NSFW]

I read in other board

Dude, is not a "internet board".

[bryant.coleman]

Billions of people use mobile phones world wide, and they are using them for the last 20-25 years. Till now, we haven't noticed a spike in brain cancer or tumour resulting from the mobile phone usage. As far as I am concerned, the risk associated with mobile phone usage is not very significant, and we should rather focus our attention on other health hazards, such as the presence of carcinogens in food items.

[Betwrong]

No, they don't.

The amount of known cancer cases haven't changed significantly since the seventies actually. But mobile phone usage has increased by several billion since the start of the nineties. If mobile phones would cause cancer somehow then this would be incredibly easy to see in the amount of reported cancer cases.

Absolutely. Now we have more than enough numbers to do a statistic research. Mobile companies would be sued thousand times and this would cause the end of mobile phones' era. All these things aren't happening though.

[xht]

They've found the same results that yes -cell phones and cell-phone towers Cause cancer. Saw a doc youtube doc last night and A lady with no family cancer history lived beside a Cell Tower, Went go to Doctor tell she got cancer.

[Gronthaing]

They've found the same results that yes -cell phones and cell-phone towers Cause cancer. Saw a doc youtube doc last night and A lady with no family cancer history lived beside a Cell Tower, Went go to Doctor tell she got cancer.

Not having cancer in the family does not mean a person won't get cancer. Not sure but aren't cancers caused by inherited genes a small minority? There are many other possible causes for the disease.

[bryant.coleman]

They've found the same results that yes -cell phones and cell-phone towers Cause cancer. Saw a doc youtube doc last night and A lady with no family cancer history lived beside a Cell Tower, Went go to Doctor tell she got cancer.

Some of the residential areas with a presence of cell phone towers are known to have high prevalence of cancer. These towers must be moved to non-residential areas, but in most of the third world nations no one bothers about their location. However, there is no concrete proof to claim that mobile phone users have a higher chance of getting cancer.

[xuan87]

yeah i ever read an article that there are no solid proof of mobile phone radiation can cause cancer because the radiation is still in a limit that the body can resist, however some of the researcher said that the tumor or cancer can be arise after 20 years of mobile phone radiation

so i dont know which one should i believe, but its better to prevent than to cure, so i make a small step of prevention by turning off my mobiles while i am sleeping

[Vika NSFW]

Some years ago was a israeli research on influence of mobile phone near the head in the zones with low covering of reciver antennas, and where the mobile phones are working wigh higher power of trasmission signal, there was find a connection with some cancer in head area.

Might be there is some information in internet about this issue.

[TECSHARE]

yeah i ever read an article that there are no solid proof of mobile phone radiation can cause cancer because the radiation is still in a limit that the body can resist, however some of the researcher said that the tumor or cancer can be arise after 20 years of mobile phone radiation

so i dont know which one should i believe, but its better to prevent than to cure, so i make a small step of prevention by turning off my mobiles while i am sleeping

You touched on a key point that is just starting to be addressed. Long term exposure.

[bryant.coleman]

yeah i ever read an article that there are no solid proof of mobile phone radiation can cause cancer because the radiation is still in a limit that the body can resist, however some of the researcher said that the tumor or cancer can be arise after 20 years of mobile phone radiation

20 years? It is very convenient.

Because mobile phones became popular only during the mid-1990s. So if someone ask these stupid scientists why there are no tumour cases among the mobile phone users, then they can argue that 20 years have not been completed, and there is going to be a sudden spike in cases from 2020 onward. People have been using mobile phones for the past 15-16 years, and till now no negative effects have been reported. It is likely to stay that way for the next 100 years as well.

[BADecker]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Move to a non-technology country. Why? The broadcasts from the cell towers and satellites still get you.

[mrhelpful]

The chances of this I would say our food has more chances then mobile phones.

The crap in the food we intake everyday causes more likely then anything else. You can easily tell when someones been eating a poor diet, and switch to a new the body heals itself and people eventually get off meds.

[Vika NSFW]

Move to a non-technology country.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbWoYckGONk

Just build a Faraday cage and not use near You mobile phone trasmitter.
Specially a lower number of trasmitters cause the high level of radiation.
There are WI FI devices as possible cancer causes.

[Racey]

What about smart meters, some cold callers came to my house saying that they had to install a smart meter for reading my usage of electricity.
He said by law you must have it installed, I told him what to do ........off I said and don't lie, now please go as I am on the non calling preferences list, and you should not be here.


Whats your name and who you do work for, I asked, he refused and walked away.
I would never had known had it been for this website below.

Your Rights in Relation to Smart Meters

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/a-reminder-your-rights-in-relation-to-smart-meters/

And all about phones

U.S. Government Expected To Advise Public of Health Risk.

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/government-study-cell-phone-radiation-boosts-cancer-rates-in-animals-25-million-ntp-study-finds-brain-tumors/

I had a standard mail sent out to all the suppliers in the UK telling them not to put me on any list, and warn them of the dangers, this was done by the site themselves, and to be honest all the cold calls stopped.
Only my home address was correct my e-mail was masked.

[SparkyU]

The type of radiation that is emitted from phones isn't high enough energy to damage human cells, it needs to be much higher up the spectrum like x-rays.  Also phones have been around long enough now that if there was something that was being overlooked it would've shown up by now.  Cancer rates have not skyrocketed like one would expect.  Conclusion, phones are safe; probably...

[Vika NSFW]

Also phones have been around long enough now that if there

a clear connection between cellphone use and higher risk of cancer

http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2012.4751?prevSearch=tel%2Baviv%2Buniversity&searchHistoryKey=&

[Racey]

Also phones have been around long enough now that if there

a clear connection between cellphone use and higher risk of cancer

http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2012.4751?prevSearch=tel%2Baviv%2Buniversity&searchHistoryKey=&

Posted May 26, 2016

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

[Vika NSFW]

Posted May 26, 2016

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1488421.msg14998308#msg14998308

[Racey]

Posted May 26, 2016

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1488421.msg14998308#msg14998308

sorry 

[Sakthi]

Using Your Cell Phone a Half Hour a Day Increases Your Risk of Brain Tumor and cell phone radiation to a long list of serious illnesses –  cancer. Cell phone radiation exposure has been principally linked to two types of brain tumor its gliomas and acoustic neuromas

[BADecker]

At this stage of cellphone usage, if a person had good nutrition, used MMS (Jim Humble), got enough sleep and exercise, his body would generally be able to overcome cellphone cancer, except in cases where there was massive usage. However, holding the cellphone away from the head, and using an ear bud and the right kind of mic (not a Bluetooth), will reduce the chances of getting cancer greatly.

[mindrust]

Although i am not talking on my cellphone too much, when i do, i experience a serious headache for a while. It is like i listened too much death metal with high volume.

Talking too long on the cellphone is probably not healthy not for just me but everybody. I don't know if this may lead to cancer but i know it is definitely not good.

[Daniel91]

OK let's be realistic here.
There is no proof that mobile phones causes cancer.
Yes, we have some speculations and theories  but not definitive evidence for it.
But, even if doctors prove it, I don't think anything will change.
We all know that smoking is very bad habit and we have proofs that smoking can cause cancer.
Still people smoke.
It's the same for GMO, air, water, pollution etc.
People with money and influence rule the world and we, average guys, don't have to much choices, isn't it?

[bryant.coleman]

Using Your Cell Phone a Half Hour a Day Increases Your Risk of Brain Tumor and cell phone radiation to a long list of serious illnesses –  cancer. Cell phone radiation exposure has been principally linked to two types of brain tumor its gliomas and acoustic neuromas

Please refrain from copy-paste spam.

http://www.electricsense.com/8822/cell-phones-cause-cancer-fact/

cell phone radiation exposures are principally linked to two types of brain tumor, gliomas and acoustic neuromas.

Now coming back to the topic, I know dozens of guys who use cell phones more than two hours a day, for the last 10-15 years. None of them are suffering from any health issues as a result of the cell phone usage. So please stop these unfounded rumors.

[BADecker]

OK let's be realistic here.
There is no proof that mobile phones causes cancer.
Yes, we have some speculations and theories  but not definitive evidence for it.
But, even if doctors prove it, I don't think anything will change.
We all know that smoking is very bad habit and we have proofs that smoking can cause cancer.
Still people smoke.
It's the same for GMO, air, water, pollution etc.
People with money and influence rule the world and we, average guys, don't have to much choices, isn't it?

And we all know guns are good for the health of those that own them, but government still tries to tell us they aren't.

[Slow death]

I live a few meters of cell phone towers and i use cell phone all the time. In my town has five cell phone towers very close to where I live and still not heard anyone have reported to have cancer because of cell phone towers

[Vika NSFW]

I know dozens of guys who use cell phones more than two hours a day, for the last 10-15 years. None of them are suffering from any health issues as a result of the cell phone usage.

So please stop these unfounded rumors.

The evidence of having a mobile phone in the way to cemitery is here.

This dude, know much how it might be dangerous, talking on mobile phone.

[virtualx]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Paywall. FTFY:
https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/National-Toxicology-Program-Carcinogenesis-Studies-of-Cell-Phone-Radiofrequency-Radiation.pdf

[gentlemand]

Every single thing on this planet seemingly causes cancer. I'll enjoy my phone and relish those juicy, glistening tumours.

[Evildrum]

I always worry about putting a laptop near my junk or a cell in my pocket.
Kind of weird this story is making the rounds again,followed by a instant story about it being false.

The amount of people that are addicted to their phones and tumor rates have not flown through the roof has to tell you something.

Got a family member that got a tumor in her brain when she hit 30 and the seizures she got after removing it where unreal. The drugs made her a complete space cadet and yet she can still drive! Sometimes you have to wonder about the medical field letting people drive looped on drugs.

[bryant.coleman]

Every single thing on this planet seemingly causes cancer. I'll enjoy my phone and relish those juicy, glistening tumours.

Don't want to get cancer? The stay away from the genetically modified food produced by Monsanto and Cargill, and use pharmaceutical products only when there is an absolute necessity. Make a habit of eating organic food, if it is affordable. Install an air-purifier at your home. Using a cell phone is not going to make much of a difference.

[Vika NSFW]

Don't want to get cancer? The stay away from the genetically modified food produced by Monsanto and Cargill

Why do You associate genetically modified plants consumation with cancer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18515776

[gentlemand]

Don't want to get cancer? The stay away from the genetically modified food produced by Monsanto and Cargill, and use pharmaceutical products only when there is an absolute necessity. Make a habit of eating organic food, if it is affordable. Install an air-purifier at your home. Using a cell phone is not going to make much of a difference.

I really couldn't give a shit. I'm old and infested with evil chemicals already. My heart is going to kill me anyway.

[Vika NSFW]

I'm old and infested with evil chemicals already. My heart is going to kill me anyway.

Eat melatonin.

[bryant.coleman]

Don't want to get cancer? The stay away from the genetically modified food produced by Monsanto and Cargill

Why do You associate genetically modified plants consumation with cancer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18515776

I don't care much about these research articles. Many of the researchers tend to be biased, and some can be influenced with bribes and other favors. For example, I recently came across a study, which claimed that 10% of the male mice are homosexual. When I read the article in detail, I found that the mice were injected with huge quantities of female hormones, and parts of their brain were removed to make them more feminine. The researchers did their best to hide these important details.

[Evildrum]

Wonder if you would put the wifi sickness in the same category as this story.
Have a neighbor that was astounded that I leave my internet on over night,she was thinking she was getting fried 3 houses down. Mind you she also gets me to stop my car at her place to tell me something and then gets pissed I am idling!

End of the day no one really knows what is good for you. Look at jogging,so many people do it and how many have bummed knees from it? If breathing is bad for you then breathing rapidly in and out during a workout has to be worse.

[gentlemand]

As society continues to evolve there are going to be ever more convoluted ways to die. We were built to expire from starvation or being a bear's lunch. No point getting your knickers in a twist over stuff like this. I find the sense of entitlement people have to a totally healthy and lengthy life pretty goddamn weird. It's a very recent development.

[Racey]

Wonder if you would put the wifi sickness in the same category as this story.
Have a neighbor that was astounded that I leave my internet on over night,she was thinking she was getting fried 3 houses down. Mind you she also gets me to stop my car at her place to tell me something and then gets pissed I am idling!

End of the day no one really knows what is good for you. Look at jogging,so many people do it and how many have bummed knees from it? If breathing is bad for you then breathing rapidly in and out during a workout has to be worse.

Yes of course, its just as dangerous.

190 Scientists & Experts Urge UN to Deal with Emerging Wireless Public Health Crisis.

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/190-scientists-experts-urge-un-to-deal-with-emerging-wireless-public-health-crisis/

190 scientists from 38 nations have submitted the International EMF Scientist Appeal to the United Nations, UN member states and the World Health Organization (WHO) requesting they adopt more protective exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields (EMF) and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of risk from this rapidly increasing environmental pollutant.
The scientists who have signed the Appeal have collectively published over 2,000 peer-reviewed papers on the biological or health effects of non-ionizing radiation.  It was submitted on 11 may 2015 to His Excellency Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, to Dr. Margaret Chan, MD, Director General of the World Health Organization, and to the United Nations Member States.

Video included.

[Maesters1-]

yes it is a fact and there is no doubt about this . the excessive use mo mobile phone can cause cancer in brain. it can also damage heart and can cause skin disease, so my suggestion is that we should reduce the use of mobile as much as possible so as to avoid these diseases.

[Masha Sha]

yes it is a fact and there is no doubt about this . the excessive use mo mobile phone can cause cancer in brain. it can also damage heart and can cause skin disease, so my suggestion is that we should reduce the use of mobile as much as possible so as to avoid these diseases.

thank you for the advice.

[abugseuf]

yes it is a fact and there is no doubt about this . the excessive use mo mobile phone can cause cancer in brain. it can also damage heart and can cause skin disease, so my suggestion is that we should reduce the use of mobile as much as possible so as to avoid these diseases.

thank you for the advice.

i have see so many documentaries on cancer due to excessive use of mobile phone. the signal can also cause heart attack and brain tumor. it can cause cancer of the year. so we should avoid excessive use of mobile. its use should be limited.

[Cresciuanto]

Don't want to get cancer? The stay away from the genetically modified food produced by Monsanto and Cargill

Why do You associate genetically modified plants consumation with cancer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18515776

I don't care much about these research articles. Many of the researchers tend to be biased, and some can be influenced with bribes and other favors. For example, I recently came across a study, which claimed that 10% of the male mice are homosexual. When I read the article in detail, I found that the mice were injected with huge quantities of female hormones, and parts of their brain were removed to make them more feminine. The researchers did their best to hide these important details.

Well I agree with you. Many are just biased research and they do not follow the ethics of research. Well I don't believe in those researches as they can change the results freely by faking it.

yes it is a fact that there are so many research program on cancer caused by mobile. the excessive use of mobile can cause the ear cancer. i think we use the mobile only on intense need. we should not use it for time pass.

[apollofire]

We should encourage such researches as they will be helpful in one way or the other

[groll]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Yes that is a fact. Mobile phones emits a certain waves they called it microwaves. Mobile phones in constant use can damage your cells. The bad news is it does not only affect the cells on the skin but it penetrates the skin. In longer exposure it may can cause cancer. But there's no need to worry just don't carry or place your mobile phones near your body, even if it is off the radio waves will pass through your mobile phones like an antenna going towards the tower.

[nururochac]

No, they don't.

The amount of known cancer cases haven't changed significantly since the seventies actually. But mobile phone usage has increased by several billion since the start of the nineties. If mobile phones would cause cancer somehow then this would be incredibly easy to see in the amount of reported cancer cases.

I agree and we have different tolerance level with rats compared to humans, so it is not really an exact similarity of what we see in rats can be a direct effect on humans too.

[kryptqnick]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

I don't think mobile phones can cause cancer to someone. I suppose it's rather the food you eat and nerves, maybe

[Maesters1-]

yeah i ever read an article that there are no solid proof of mobile phone radiation can cause cancer because the radiation is still in a limit that the body can resist, however some of the researcher said that the tumor or cancer can be arise after 20 years of mobile phone radiation

20 years? It is very convenient.

Because mobile phones became popular only during the mid-1990s. So if someone ask these stupid scientists why there are no tumour cases among the mobile phone users, then they can argue that 20 years have not been completed, and there is going to be a sudden spike in cases from 2020 onward. People have been using mobile phones for the past 15-16 years, and till now no negative effects have been reported. It is likely to stay that way for the next 100 years as well.

i think every thinkg has its own good and bad points. i think if we use mobile in a limit. then it is not a bad device. i think excess of every thing has bad effect on our body. we have to use every think in its limit. if  a person is using mobile for hours what do you think will happen to his mind and year.

[BlueStackz]

We should encourage such researches as they will be helpful in one way or the other

Correct these kind of researches should be encouraged for the healthy society. Cancer is a serious problem. And studies should be done about mobile radiation to make it safer. With the increment of these researches we should make sure that children shouldn't be allowed to use cellphones.  As they aren't fully developed.

[Tanic]

From mobile phones or not, radio active energy is attacking us everyday and every hour. And to scare mobile phones is the same like to scare the sun.
If you wish to feel save from that and care about your health - go to live in the forest without any gadgets of nowadays humanity.

[Cresciuanto]

From mobile phones or not, radio active energy is attacking us everyday and every hour. And to scare mobile phones is the same like to scare the sun.
If you wish to feel save from that and care about your health - go to live in the forest without any gadgets of nowadays humanity.

yes it is a fact but one thing i want to tell you that if we want to keep our self safe from suck kind of cancer then you should reduce the use of mobile phone. although it is impossible to quit it for ever, but we can still reduce it. and that is the only way to be safe from cancer causing by ear.

[Cyaren]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

I heard it many many times,that if I speak too much through the phone i will get infertility.
Is that true? I actually doubt it,cause if it was true,phones would be banned probably,and even if not,this hypothesis would be more known all across the world.
And its not popular actually.

[Vika NSFW]

Is that true?

Ask about this issue at people affected by cancer, if the price is high or low to die trough celphone using.

[hermanhs09]

The type of radiation that is emitted from phones isn't high enough energy to damage human cells, it needs to be much higher up the spectrum like x-rays.  Also phones have been around long enough now that if there was something that was being overlooked it would've shown up by now.  Cancer rates have not skyrocketed like one would expect.  Conclusion, phones are safe; probably...

I was talking with some guy who said the same as you,that the radiation which is emitted by phones dont have enough energy,but i also heard this
opinion that it really does,i actually think this is not right cause someone should really find it out before,and it would be changed or banned probably.

[Cresciuanto]

We should encourage such researches as they will be helpful in one way or the other

Correct these kind of researches should be encouraged for the healthy society. Cancer is a serious problem. And studies should be done about mobile radiation to make it safer. With the increment of these researches we should make sure that children shouldn't be allowed to use cellphones.  As they aren't fully developed.

i think the scientes have done so much study on this issue. and they have given the statements that the successive use of mobile can cause cancer. you can also see documentary and can see video in the justification of these statements.

[ardentvolcanoes]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

do they have a explanation of how long would it take for human to have a brain tumor because of a mobile phones ? i've heard about it so much time and it is still became an issue . well i have used 4 different mobile phone since 2009 and i didn't have any problem from it .

[Betwrong]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Nope. Don't trust everything you read on the internet. If that was even half true the huge mobile companies would be sued to death. I think the info either a total hoax or a kind of mistake.

[crairezx20]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Nope. Don't trust everything you read on the internet. If that was even half true the huge mobile companies would be sued to death. I think the info either a total hoax or a kind of mistake.

I think it can be true because we already seen many video that radio waves from mobile phones can break the glass..
So its possible that it can be dangerous in our life while we are using phones. or even laptop and desktop.. it can risk your life..

[simpler2016]

I believe in it. Although mobile phone manufacturers say that it is safe. But the negative impact of mobile is still there

[European Central Bank]

think how much has changed in the last 2-3 generations. someone 100 years ago wasn't exposed to radio waves, radiation, artificial foods, vehicle emissions, building materials. there's so much toxicity that it's impossible to untangle what's killing us and what isn't. maybe none of it is.

[v1ryspro]

I think there is no connection between the phone and this terrible disease. The producers care about their customers nowadays high-tech.

[markj113]

think how much has changed in the last 2-3 generations. someone 100 years ago wasn't exposed to radio waves, radiation, artificial foods, vehicle emissions, building materials. there's so much toxicity that it's impossible to untangle what's killing us and what isn't. maybe none of it is.

100 years ago life expectancy was also a lot lower than it is now.

It seems all these things are increasing our lifespan

[birareru1988]

The modern world is not possible without a mobile phone. If people know about the dangers of cell phones still will not abandon them.

[Dizaster2015]

In road accidents killed so many people and now to ban cars? The risk is a payment for progress.

[TicTacTic]

To live too bad.You can die from it. What kind of food we eat? We from food will die faster than from the phone.

[Perle]

Even if you turn off your mobile phone there are so many transmission towers that irradiation does not become less.

[virasog]

Facts are really the way to go with stuff like this.  A mobile phone and many other things are acutally very similar.  From your old type TV's, car stereo, and many other things to the mobile phone, all operate on radio waves.  The mobile phone sits in around the 808 Mhz band.  They vary a little depending on the carrier.  Although most carriers rent the bandwidth from the big ones. 

[fiscorcle]

This to me is just terror forming tactics from the government to instill fear into the global population to keep them dosile.

[Harry Callahan]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

do they have a explanation of how long would it take for human to have a brain tumor because of a mobile phones ? i've heard about it so much time and it is still became an issue . well i have used 4 different mobile phone since 2009 and i didn't have any problem from it .

you do not really know or understand the direct impact of mobile phone radiation right now as you have mentioned you changed phones since 2009 and i am assuming that you started using mobile by 2009,it is relatively a small amount of time to understand the long term impact.mobile phones are very much common after 2000's i guess,16 years to understand the long term impact is a short amount  of time,only time will tell

[virtualx]

I think there is no connection between the phone and this terrible disease. The producers care about their customers nowadays high-tech.

Maybe there is a connection, the producers are high-tech experts not health experts. Experiments are necessary to find out, but who's paying the research?

[eminem90]

I think there is no connection between the phone and this terrible disease. The producers care about their customers nowadays high-tech.

Maybe there is a connection, the producers are high-tech experts not health experts. Experiments are necessary to find out, but who's paying the research?

That's it. Anybody does not check what sort of waves and radiation, or something else. That even if the conduct of research, and they will be positive, the big corporations will not allow them to publish. Earlier mobile was not and people were healthier.

[bitdumper]

i think the op is righg and maybe it is omething like a slow cancer maybe it is not affecting us but it can effect our childrens (btw pron these days will eggect more than phones) and we already know about x rays theory and the side effects of it

[gabmen]

No, they don't.

The amount of known cancer cases haven't changed significantly since the seventies actually. But mobile phone usage has increased by several billion since the start of the nineties. If mobile phones would cause cancer somehow then this would be incredibly easy to see in the amount of reported cancer cases.

Well thats a very good and logical observation right there. There maybe some cases where in those things emitted by mobile phones may affect one's health, but not as grave as to cause cancer.

[virasog]

I believe in it. Although mobile phone manufacturers say that it is safe. But the negative impact of mobile is still there

Your wireless internet in the house, the cordless phone a few people may have still sitting around, again, these are radio waves too.  Now, can radio waves kill?  Can they cause damamge to physical flesh? 

[groll]

I may agree with that studies but not only cancer.  I think because of the radiation that is why tumor on brains developed.  Not only that, our eyes were affected because of its prolong exposure to cellphones.  I heard that we should not use or entertain a call if our cellphone is under 15% because of its high radiation.

You may not feel that there is someyhing wrong with you because there seems no problem but there is nothing wrong if we follow it.

[virasog]

I believe in it. Although mobile phone manufacturers say that it is safe. But the negative impact of mobile is still there

Your wireless internet in the house, the cordless phone a few people may have still sitting around, again, these are radio waves too.  Now, can radio waves kill?  Can they cause damamge to physical flesh? 

Yes, if strong enough, they can cook a person.  The microwave in your house is not spewing forth radioation, those are focused and concentrated radio waves moving the molecules of the food.  A huge Navy radio transmittor can cook or burn a person.

[daiyuba1971]

Everything invented by man is harmful. The degree of damage is different. Sometimes less harm than good. A refrigerator for example. A good thing, but the person suffering from obesity.

[Xester]

Yes I think it could be possible because almost everyone uses cellphones.  The radiation we get to it especially if its less than 15% according to the studies conducted by the specialist shows a very high radiation.  But I do think it would be too long for anyone to develop cancer by using cellphine but it could be possible.

[SaltySpitoon]

Cellphones don't cause cancer. The wavelength of cellphone frequencies is too large to cause any sort of cellular damage. They are very low energy waves at that, so there's no risk what so ever.

I have no idea how the rumor that cellphones could cause cancer started. There is absolutely no scientific backing or even plausible pseudo theory to explain why cell phones could cause cancer.

[machinek20]

well there are no solid evidence yet, some of the scientist claims that it was fine, the others claims that it was dangerous, the one that i knew is the radiation from cellphone is not good, because it can cause headaches, but developing cancer or tumor still got no evidence

[SaltySpitoon]

well there are no solid evidence yet, some of the scientist claims that it was fine, the others claims that it was dangerous, the one that i knew is the radiation from cellphone is not good, because it can cause headaches, but developing cancer or tumor still got no evidence

The solid evidence is in the basic principals of wave/particle physics. No scientists even question whether or not cell phones are dangerous. If you have a banana for breakfast, that is technically one trillion (10^12) times more radiation than from cell phone signals. The energy of a wave = plank's constant * the frequency. 6.63x10^-34Js * 2x10^9Hz (2Ghz) = 1.2x10^-24 J. On the other hand, the Potassium 40 in your morning banana is a beta emitter. Beta emitters give off around 1x10^-12 J. Something else to keep in mind, FM Radio is around 100Mhz, compare that to Cellphones and the energy isn't much different. We all know Xrays are dangerous, well they start around 3x10^16 Hz. Visible Lights is 430-770 Thz (4.3-7.7x10^14 Hz). Cell Phones, Wifi, Bluetooth, things in the Ghz range are 100% completely safe. There is absolutely no reason based on science that non ionizing RF radiation is detrimental to human health.

Long story short, sunlight and bananas are doing trillions of times more damage to you than that call to mom.

[virtualx]

Cellphones don't cause cancer. The wavelength of cellphone frequencies is too large to cause any sort of cellular damage. They are very low energy waves at that, so there's no risk what so ever.

I could tell you "Bananas don't cause cancer, they are yellow and this color doesn't cause any sort of cellular damage". Please post experimental results, this is not a religious debate.
OP posted link to article with some results on rats, it's more convincing than one liners.

[xht]

I believe in it. Although mobile phone manufacturers say that it is safe. But the negative impact of mobile is still there

Your wireless internet in the house, the cordless phone a few people may have still sitting around, again, these are radio waves too.  Now, can radio waves kill?  Can they cause damamge to physical flesh? 

Radiation from radio signal,WiFi and Bluetooth, Cooking food (in a microwave oven) not as big signal radiation from mobile phone so there is no case or news that the signal from the equipment of it can provoke cancer cells.

[Racey]

What about smart metering

The smart metering system is made up of: one electricity smart meter, one gas smart meter, a communications hub and an in-home display unit - the smart energy monitor on which you can view your energy (read more on this device in the section below). Smart meters measure actual, total gas and electricity usage.

These readings are automatically sent to British Gas using wireless technology similar to a mobile phone

https://www.britishgas.co.uk/smarter-living/control-energy/smart-meters/what-are-smart-meters.html

The Home Area Network (HAN) This links the meter to the appliances within the property. If wireless, this can use ZigBee, Z-wave or Wi-Fi radiation systems – typically in the ~2.5 Ghz range.   Whilst operating with shorter wavelengths, the wireless Home Area Network (HAN) is also able to penetrate walls, floors and ceilings. For residents in apartment blocks, or for houses built closely together, then a property may be exposed to several of their neighbour’s HAN.  (If you have been led to believe that WiFi is safe, there are many studies suggesting otherwise – and even telecoms industry patents (click here) claiming it causes significant harm to human biology.)

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/what-are-smart-meters/

Home page http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/



https://youtu.be/y4JDEspdx58

[Dizaster2015]

well there are no solid evidence yet, some of the scientist claims that it was fine, the others claims that it was dangerous, the one that i knew is the radiation from cellphone is not good, because it can cause headaches, but developing cancer or tumor still got no evidence

Then why not a phone to carry in your pocket? Transmitters signal provider cannot be placed closer than 50 meters from residential buildings. Unhealthy for sure.

[satdas]

yes there are some cases reports, and i say that on social media, i think we should be careful about and should try not to use mobile without feeling the ex trim need of using mobile.

[Sundark]

Cellphones don't cause cancer. The wavelength of cellphone frequencies is too large to cause any sort of cellular damage. They are very low energy waves at that, so there's no risk what so ever.

I have no idea how the rumor that cellphones could cause cancer started. There is absolutely no scientific backing or even plausible pseudo theory to explain why cell phones could cause cancer.

Well, there were many inventions before which were totally safe - and later when science evolved suddenly they become totally dangerous.
Cigarettes are main example - for the first half of 20th century they were advertised as a cure for stress.

[SaltySpitoon]

I could tell you "Bananas don't cause cancer, they are yellow and this color doesn't cause any sort of cellular damage". Please post experimental results, this is not a religious debate.
OP posted link to article with some results on rats, it's more convincing than one liners.

I'd agree with you that bananas don't cause cancer. That doesn't change the fact that Potassium 40 a beta emitting isotope of Potassium is present in Bananas. I'm not entirely sure how to link a source for my in progress Masters Degree in Nuclear Physics, but I did explain the energy emission of cell phone waves vs the energy emission of Beta decay.

Well, there were many inventions before which were totally safe - and later when science evolved suddenly they become totally dangerous.
Cigarettes are main example - for the first half of 20th century they were advertised as a cure for stress.

This isn't a matter of carcinogens or other effects on the human body by substances, its a matter of the laws of physics based on energy. Cancer from radiation is caused by ionizing energy from high energy waves causing damage to the body. The RF spectrum we are talking about isn't considered ionizing as the energy is too low. It is entirely possible that we don't understand the true causes of cancer, and for that reason Cell Phone signals could cause cancer. But in order for that to be true, sunlight and such would cause 100,000x as much damage as cell phones, (as sunlight has 100,000x more energy) still making them have negligible effect.

*where my numbers figures come from

The solid evidence is in the basic principals of wave/particle physics. No scientists even question whether or not cell phones are dangerous. If you have a banana for breakfast, that is technically one trillion (10^12) times more radiation than from cell phone signals. The energy of a wave = plank's constant * the frequency. 6.63x10^-34Js * 2x10^9Hz (2Ghz) = 1.2x10^-24 J. On the other hand, the Potassium 40 in your morning banana is a beta emitter. Beta emitters give off around 1x10^-12 J. Something else to keep in mind, FM Radio is around 100Mhz, compare that to Cellphones and the energy isn't much different. We all know Xrays are dangerous, well they start around 3x10^16 Hz. Visible Lights is 430-770 Thz (4.3-7.7x10^14 Hz). Cell Phones, Wifi, Bluetooth, things in the Ghz range are 100% completely safe. There is absolutely no reason based on science that non ionizing RF radiation is detrimental to human health.

Long story short, sunlight and bananas are doing trillions of times more damage to you than that call to mom.

[virtualx]

I could tell you "Bananas don't cause cancer, they are yellow and this color doesn't cause any sort of cellular damage". Please post experimental results, this is not a religious debate.
OP posted link to article with some results on rats, it's more convincing than one liners.

I'd agree with you that bananas don't cause cancer. That doesn't change the fact that Potassium 40 a beta emitting isotope of Potassium is present in Bananas. I'm not entirely sure how to link a source for my in progress Masters Degree in Nuclear Physics, but I did explain the energy emission of cell phone waves vs the energy emission of Beta decay.

The explanation is good, but its in contrast to the results in the paper of OP. Are they a fraud? Did they mess up the experiment?

[SaltySpitoon]

The explanation is good, but its in contrast to the results in the paper of OP. Are they a fraud? Did they mess up the experiment?

I actually found a review of the experiment linked in the OP by the ACEBR

http://acebr.uow.edu.au/index.html

Here is their official statement, of course you can read it all on the link above, but for those who don't want to follow the link.

An overall consideration is that the NTP release does not contain sufficient information to enable adequate review. For example, without detail of other endpoints tested it is hard to correctly interpret the statistical analyses. This is pointed out by Reviewer Dr Lauer, from the National Institutes of Health, who writes

“Why aren’t we being told, at least at a high level, of the results of other experiments (i.e., male and female mice, tissues other than heart and brain, tumors other than glioma and schwannoma)? Given the multiple comparisons inherent in this kind of work… there is a high risk of false positive discoveries. In the absence of knowing other findings, we must worry about selective reporting bias.” Dr Lauer states “I am unable to accept the authors’ conclusions”. Indeed as pointed out by the NTP Associate Director Dr Bucher at the NTP press conference, about 20 to 30% of the scientists within NTP who examined the report did not agree with the conclusions; an indication that more thorough scrutiny was required. Without such thorough scrutiny the conclusions cannot be taken as more than the provisional positions of the authors, rather than a scientific contribution.

However, even given the limited information provided, there are a number of issues that stand out and question the relevance of the NTP report to public health. These include both methodological and interpretational issues.

There are also very... very... basic methodical errors also listed.

[virtualx]

The explanation is good, but its in contrast to the results in the paper of OP. Are they a fraud? Did they mess up the experiment?

I actually found a review of the experiment linked in the OP by the ACEBR

http://acebr.uow.edu.au/index.html

Here is their official statement, of course you can read it all on the link above, but for those who don't want to follow the link.

An overall consideration is that the NTP release does not contain sufficient information to enable adequate review. For example, without detail of other endpoints tested it is hard to correctly interpret the statistical analyses. This is pointed out by Reviewer Dr Lauer, from the National Institutes of Health, who writes

“Why aren’t we being told, at least at a high level, of the results of other experiments (i.e., male and female mice, tissues other than heart and brain, tumors other than glioma and schwannoma)? Given the multiple comparisons inherent in this kind of work… there is a high risk of false positive discoveries. In the absence of knowing other findings, we must worry about selective reporting bias.” Dr Lauer states “I am unable to accept the authors’ conclusions”. Indeed as pointed out by the NTP Associate Director Dr Bucher at the NTP press conference, about 20 to 30% of the scientists within NTP who examined the report did not agree with the conclusions; an indication that more thorough scrutiny was required. Without such thorough scrutiny the conclusions cannot be taken as more than the provisional positions of the authors, rather than a scientific contribution.

However, even given the limited information provided, there are a number of issues that stand out and question the relevance of the NTP report to public health. These include both methodological and interpretational issues.

There are also very... very... basic methodical errors also listed.

I'm convinced, thanks! The scientists were to fast to jump to conclusions in this paper.

[Zosuda]

i heard it could take longer then our life time for mobile to affect our brains or cause cancer.

[virasog]

yes there are some cases reports, and i say that on social media, i think we should be careful about and should try not to use mobile without feeling the ex trim need of using mobile.

Mobile phones?  Not a chance, it is too weak and, more importantly, not focused.  But, let's say that all of what people say is possible, just for ++++ and giggles.  There is nothing that you can do now. 

[virasog]

Putting down your mobile phone does  nothing about the myriad of signals passing around you and through you right now.  So, don't be afraid to make the call, your friends, neighbors, the TV, the computer, and many things are all covering you in the same radio waves right this second.

[Dank14]

The truth is, no one knows the real cause of cancer. The research goes on...

[bitcoinisbest]

The rays from the mobile which is invisible effects the brain in a slow way and continuous talking on the phone over the years will hamper your brain and effects at the older age. That is why even mobile antenna are under radar for harmful rays.

[PlanetOfBets]

Very high levels of radiation are known to cause harmful effects in humans. However, the "high radiation level" referred to here is not mobile phones but very powerful UHF / VHF television transmitters, FM radio transmitters and radars. These are the most feared ones.

[botija]

What about Wifi and cancel. There's a lot of things in this era that can hurt us. What are we going to do? Stop using cellphones?

[ObscureBean]

What about Wifi and cancel. There's a lot of things in this era that can hurt us. What are we going to do? Stop using cellphones?

There is no need for anyone to stop using cellphones if they don't want to. At the end of the day it's your call, you decide if cancer is an acceptable risk. But you can't turn around and blame phone manufacturers or anyone else if you end up with cancer. This is true for everything in life, you always only have yourself to blame for your actions/thoughts/decisions.

[Kava]

The rays from the mobile which is invisible effects the brain in a slow way and continuous talking on the phone over the years will hamper your brain and effects at the older age. That is why even mobile antenna are under radar for harmful rays.

this is only a theory. Scientists have not proved it. And if they can prove it is necessary to prohibit all mobile phones. Or develop secure

[Sex Video Chat VKcams.com]

Scientists have not proved it. And if they can prove it is necessary to prohibit all mobile phones. Or develop secure

They are in official european list of cancerogenic fonts.

[BADecker]

If you eat really healthy, you will die of old age before the phone cancer gets you.

[crairezx20]

I think its impossible to cause cancer using those mobiles phones. maybe in your eyes if you are stay too much in your computer with high contrast can affect your eyesight..

[Vika NSFW]

http://cancer-code-europe.iarc.fr/index.php/en/ecac-12-ways/radiation-recommendation/100-any-cancer-risk-from-non-ionizing-radiation

Is there any cancer risk from non-ionizing radiation, like the electromagnetic fields from power lines, the microwaves used in microwave ovens, and the radio waves used for wireless technologies (mobile phones, Wi-Fi, television, and radio)?

Electric, magnetic, or electromagnetic fields emitted from devices such as electrical appliances, broadcasting transmitters, power lines or electrical wiring, mobile phones, or other wireless communication do not have enough energy to break chemical bonds; thus, these fields are called “non-ionizing radiation”.

The known biological effects of these fields can occur at much higher levels of exposure than those that occur in everyday situations. These include nerve stimulation and tissue heating, but technologies comply with protection guidelines that are set to prevent these health effects. These types of non-ionizing radiation are not recognized as causes of cancer.

However, some technologies are relatively new, or the ways in which they are used have changed. In such situations, it takes scientists a long time to collect enough data to rule out cancer risk with certainty.
 For example, there are some open questions related to heavy use of mobile phones.
 Until firm scientific conclusions can be drawn,
some easy-to-follow measures can be used to reduce everyday exposure,
 like using a wired hands-free set or avoiding very long phone calls.

[EnacDomains]

we're not rats

[Kotone]

The peer-reviewed study found rats exposed to the type of radio waves emitted by mobile phones were more likely to develop tumours in their brains and hearts.

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699

Cellphone are maybe exposed but cellphone nowadays are super called technology you will not know that watching movies , reading memes from facebook you didn't know the time and it makes the time and day more faster so that we didn't get boored that much when we have cellphones.

[wowanstrong]

all that surrounds us and kills us a little bit. We can not fully prove the benefits and dangers of something. Therefore, it is likely that mobile phone radiation in some way harm