Ah.. Proudhon. I remember him fondly..
Sure, he was completely wrong, but at least he put some *effort into being wrong, with *some semi-believable rationales and explanations that sounded vaguely credible..sometimes.
Not like todays new-fangled imitation bears who think that "Bitcoin is broken, wait for 2.0, Altcoin "X" is better, prepare for dump !" and such is credible negative analysis.
Although there were gems of his like "Bitcoin is overvalued at $10, I think the real value is somewhere around $1-$2" (shortly before the rise to $32), and an earlier one I forget the exact words to about it being "ridiculous and delusionary" that *anyone would think that these imaginary internet tokens could possibly have equal value to the US dollar at about the time it reached dollar parity.
Ah, who wouldnt love to go back in time and show him the future. (and snatch up some sub-$1 coins as well
)
And to all you current bears.. you're just pale shadows of the original llama-headed Bitcoin-bear - Proudhon.
People probably wont even remember your name, unless you have really demonstrated a sustained serious case of embarassing verbal diarrhea (kwack Kwack).