Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 09:00:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A possible solution to blocksize limit  (Read 504 times)
dree12 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 04:28:33 AM
 #1

Is there demand for a solution that will (hopefully) solve the problems below? I ask because I don't wish to bother the devs with an incomplete and useless proposal.

BIP RFC: A solution to the block size limit?
Changes
This solution requires several changes to the Bitcoin system:
  • The block header has an additional field added to it: the size of the block.
  • The algorithm for chain length is changed. See below for details.
Strengths
There are several strengths in this system.
  • There is no need to increase the size of the block limit.
  • Clients do not waste bandwidth downloading large blocks.
  • Block sizes will be regulated through risk and reward, that is, by the market.
Weaknesses
There are several weaknesses in this system.
  • A 51% attack is more dangerous, as miners have more control.
  • A 51% attack may be easier to conduct, as the attacker could mine empty blocks.
Concepts
This solution relies on several properties of the Bitcoin system:
  • The length of a chain can be determined through only the block headers.
  • The block headers are of a fixed size.
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
1715374840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715374840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715374840
Reply with quote  #2

1715374840
Report to moderator
poly
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


Weighted companion cube


View Profile
March 07, 2013, 12:45:13 PM
 #2

How would it work exactly? Let's say there's two chains:

Block A - 210kb -> Block B - 300kb -> Block C - 582kb

versus

Block A - 210kb -> Block D - 175kb

Doesn't sound like it'll work well.

poly | My Tip Jar
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!