Simple Solution to S.Dice spam

[mccorvic]

 It is also NO threat to BTC

Because, like I said, people will act in their own interests and ignore it.

[1715415925]

1715415925

[1715415925]

1715415925

[1715415925]

1715415925

[1715415925]

1715415925

[1715415925]

1715415925

[Bitobsessed]

 It is also NO threat to BTC

Because, like I said, people will act in their own interests and ignore it.

People are also acting in their own interests and are using it.

[mccorvic]

 It is also NO threat to BTC

Because, like I said, people will act in their own interests and ignore it.

People are also acting in their own interests and are using it.

We'll see, but I believe they aren't and, if they do, then they are unbelievable stupid.  "Just can't wait to devalue all my investments!" Who says that?

My evidence is laid out, is correct, and time will tell.

/signing off

[Bitobsessed]

 It is also NO threat to BTC

Because, like I said, people will act in their own interests and ignore it.

People are also acting in their own interests and are using it.

We'll see, but I believe they aren't and, if they do, then they are unbelievable stupid.  "Just can't wait to devalue all my investments!" Who says that?

My evidence is laid out, is correct, and time will tell.

/signing off

Fair enough.

[conspirosphere.tk]

wonder why no one mentioned Terracoins?
 

[amincd]

This should be moved to 'Alternative cryptocurrencies'.

Promoting adoption of Bitcoin variants like Litecoin is in my opinion bad for peer-to-peer currency as a whole, as it promotes introducing additional money supplies, which reduces the integrity of peer-to-peer currency supply scarcity, and it fragments the network, while introducing nothing new in terms of the general functionality and security model.

You can create more Bitcoin with a hard fork, just like you can increase the block size limit with a hard fork. Once a hard fork happens in Bitcoin, I'm out, there's no guarantee Bitcoin's 21M limit won't be lifted with another hard fork.

You can call it a hard fork, or you can call it a mandatory upgrade version 3 blocks.

Either way I'm not worried about it because:

1) It's an upgrade that was discussed as eventually being necessary literally from the beginning so I don't consider it to be a change to the nature of Bitcoin.

+1