potatopower
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
July 28, 2016, 06:57:13 PM |
|
As long as the bitcoin price does not rise more than 300% every year, the bull run will last very long period.
That is right. The big pump and dump will do very big damage to the bitcoin. So a smooth run is better. you are right but overall the price still has to go only up in order to attract a lot of people to bitcoins who want to invest into it in my opinion it is the only question in time when another pump and dump is going to happen, i think that we will see a huge growth in like a month
|
|
|
|
Dafar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
|
|
July 28, 2016, 06:58:28 PM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY?
|
|
|
|
sanas
|
|
July 30, 2016, 07:10:31 PM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin?
|
.cashaa.... | | | █████ █╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬██ █████ | | | | ██████ ██╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬██ ██████ | | | █████ ██╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬█ █████ |
|
|
|
Ailmand
|
|
August 05, 2016, 11:07:35 AM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin? I do not think so. Big pump and dump of the bitcoin price is bad for the mass adoption of the bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
sanas
|
|
August 06, 2016, 04:55:38 PM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin? I do not think so. Big pump and dump of the bitcoin price is bad for the mass adoption of the bitcoin. That is right. But that is the growth pain. It will take some time for the bitcoin to be mature and stable.
|
.cashaa.... | | | █████ █╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬██ █████ | | | | ██████ ██╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬██ ██████ | | | █████ ██╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬█ █████ |
|
|
|
Utrine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:53:18 AM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin? I do not think so. Big pump and dump of the bitcoin price is bad for the mass adoption of the bitcoin. That is right. But that is the growth pain. It will take some time for the bitcoin to be mature and stable. There was a Bitfinex hack recently, the bitcoin price dropped 25% at one stage. So there will be more pains.
|
|
|
|
sanas
|
|
August 08, 2016, 12:01:09 PM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin? I do not think so. Big pump and dump of the bitcoin price is bad for the mass adoption of the bitcoin. That is right. But that is the growth pain. It will take some time for the bitcoin to be mature and stable. There was a Bitfinex hack recently, the bitcoin price dropped 25% at one stage. So there will be more pains. As time goes on, the investors will forget about the hack and the pain, they will start buying bitcoin again.
|
.cashaa.... | | | █████ █╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬██ █████ | | | | ██████ ██╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬██ ██████ | | | █████ ██╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬█ █████ |
|
|
|
Roger Burton
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
August 08, 2016, 12:10:43 PM |
|
Yeah, I'm not sure you wouldn't want a rise of greater than 100% over the course of the next 20 years. 100% would put Bitcoin at $1,300, which would be way too small of value for Bitcoin to keep moving and keep the investor base it has for those next 20 years. You're looking at, at the very least, a relative doubling of the value for each year for the halvings to work and to keep the investors interested. That's just my opinion though.
I don't even know why I replied. I hate it when people say they WANT the price to stay low or to only rise at a snail's pace. It's not good for bitcoin, it's not good for them, it's not good for anyone... just, WHY? If you do not think so. Do you think the price bubble in later 2013 is good for the adoption of the bitocin? I do not think so. Big pump and dump of the bitcoin price is bad for the mass adoption of the bitcoin. That is right. But that is the growth pain. It will take some time for the bitcoin to be mature and stable. There was a Bitfinex hack recently, the bitcoin price dropped 25% at one stage. So there will be more pains. As time goes on, the investors will forget about the hack and the pain, they will start buying bitcoin again. The price has almost recovered from that dump which is awesome and shows appreciation to Bitcoin itself
|
|
|
|
Backside walkaround
|
|
August 08, 2016, 12:16:18 PM |
|
It's a pretty good bull run we're having, and it's been rising pretty much since last year, though we stalled out for a while. It's crazy to think that signature campaign earnings could feed someone in a poor country. Can you imagine if we got to $10,000 or higher? Assuming payouts didn't decrease, that would be unreal.
|
If the original Backside walkaround can prove to me they are the old owner of this account, I can update the email address to the email address of their choosing. Backside walkaround has lost access to their account as they used someone else's email address to sign up, and the owner of the email address got tired of random email notifications from this site after a few months and reset the password.
|
|
|
Dafar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
|
|
August 08, 2016, 01:35:07 PM |
|
It's a pretty good bull run we're having, and it's been rising pretty much since last year, though we stalled out for a while. It's crazy to think that signature campaign earnings could feed someone in a poor country. Can you imagine if we got to $10,000 or higher? Assuming payouts didn't decrease, that would be unreal.
How much have you made though signature campaigns? I'm considering it... but dont wanna sell my soul
|
|
|
|
sanas
|
|
August 09, 2016, 11:57:47 AM |
|
It's a pretty good bull run we're having, and it's been rising pretty much since last year, though we stalled out for a while. It's crazy to think that signature campaign earnings could feed someone in a poor country. Can you imagine if we got to $10,000 or higher? Assuming payouts didn't decrease, that would be unreal.
How much have you made though signature campaigns? I'm considering it... but dont wanna sell my soul There is not much to be made from the signature campaign. It is better to earn money from other sources.
|
.cashaa.... | | | █████ █╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬██ █████ | | | | ██████ ██╬██ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬██ ██████ | | | █████ ██╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ █╬█ ██╬█ █████ |
|
|
|
Ailmand
|
|
September 04, 2016, 07:35:41 AM |
|
It's a pretty good bull run we're having, and it's been rising pretty much since last year, though we stalled out for a while. It's crazy to think that signature campaign earnings could feed someone in a poor country. Can you imagine if we got to $10,000 or higher? Assuming payouts didn't decrease, that would be unreal.
How much have you made though signature campaigns? I'm considering it... but dont wanna sell my soul There is not much to be made from the signature campaign. It is better to earn money from other sources. I mine the bitcoin indirectly. I mine the altcoins and then sell the altcoins for the bitcoin. It is quite profitable now.
|
|
|
|
PsursV
|
|
September 04, 2016, 09:28:48 PM |
|
yes i am also hopeful that the price of bitcoin will continue rising and will never fell down so much again as we have expected in past, the reason is just simple, as more and more people are entering in the field of bitcoin and they are also investing their money here.
|
|
|
|
Utrine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2016, 05:38:44 PM |
|
yes i am also hopeful that the price of bitcoin will continue rising and will never fell down so much again as we have expected in past, the reason is just simple, as more and more people are entering in the field of bitcoin and they are also investing their money here.
That is my hope as well. But the bitcoin price is quite volatile. That is the reason it cannot be a good currency now.
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
|
September 10, 2016, 06:58:15 AM |
|
yes i am also hopeful that the price of bitcoin will continue rising and will never fell down so much again as we have expected in past, the reason is just simple, as more and more people are entering in the field of bitcoin and they are also investing their money here.
No matter how many people are adopting Bitcoin, we'll always see massive dumps from time to time. It's how this market is, and it won't change. Better take the best out of it by scooping up more coins in times when the price gets dumped down hard. Make from something that certain people don't see as being good, something positive where you can benefit from.
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 10, 2016, 08:59:38 PM |
|
It can't be, because the current implementation can't handle mass adaption right now.
We can barely even handle the current traffic because of that stupid arbitrary 1 MB blocksize limit that serves no purpose other than to clog the network.
Once that problem is dealt with, we might see a real bull run.
|
|
|
|
Utrine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2016, 06:10:49 PM |
|
It can't be, because the current implementation can't handle mass adaption right now.
We can barely even handle the current traffic because of that stupid arbitrary 1 MB blocksize limit that serves no purpose other than to clog the network.
Once that problem is dealt with, we might see a real bull run.
I heard the SegWit will be released soon. So maybe in a year, the block size will be good enough for mass adoption.
|
|
|
|
Whosdaddy
|
|
September 16, 2016, 06:45:17 PM Last edit: September 19, 2016, 11:29:45 AM by Whosdaddy |
|
It can't be, because the current implementation can't handle mass adaption right now.
We can barely even handle the current traffic because of that stupid arbitrary 1 MB blocksize limit that serves no purpose other than to clog the network.
Once that problem is dealt with, we might see a real bull run.
But I do notice all the blocks were not filled up also the unconfirmed transactions are comparatively less. So, still lot of growth of bitcoin will be possible with this block size itself. The need of increasing block size greater than 1 MB will be initiated based on unconfirmed transactions which still will be having enough fees. Hopefully devs will not wait till those days, before any bottleneck occurs and we are going to see block size increases. As of now, block size is not a big hurdle for bitcoin to move towards mainstream of adoptions.
|
|
|
|
HarryKPeters
|
|
September 16, 2016, 09:47:16 PM |
|
It can't be, because the current implementation can't handle mass adaption right now.
We can barely even handle the current traffic because of that stupid arbitrary 1 MB blocksize limit that serves no purpose other than to clog the network.
Once that problem is dealt with, we might see a real bull run.
I heard the SegWit will be released soon. So maybe in a year, the block size will be good enough for mass adoption. With the new segwit implemtatoin and november ahead we may be in for a treat. Although I am not sure at what time they actually will decided to launch it. The more times it takes, the better and less the impact will be.
|
|
|
|
Ailmand
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:04:34 PM |
|
It can't be, because the current implementation can't handle mass adaption right now.
We can barely even handle the current traffic because of that stupid arbitrary 1 MB blocksize limit that serves no purpose other than to clog the network.
Once that problem is dealt with, we might see a real bull run.
I heard the SegWit will be released soon. So maybe in a year, the block size will be good enough for mass adoption. With the new segwit implemtatoin and november ahead we may be in for a treat. Although I am not sure at what time they actually will decided to launch it. The more times it takes, the better and less the impact will be. Why Novemeber is so important? Will the SegWit be released at the time?
|
|
|
|
|