Post quality?

[Zilara12]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

[1714127620]

1714127620

[x|8y8|x]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

What is the way to calculate the percentage of good post?!?

[Zilara12]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

What is the way to calculate the percentage of good post?!?

I usualy check the stats here http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/

[jacee]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

The percentage you get on bctalkaccountpricer.info is not accurate. It is just an estimate of the number of words you usually make in a post. A constructive post doesn't necessarily has to be long or an essay. A one sentence post or even a two word explanation is constructive as long as it is on topic, it is substantial, it has thought and it is original.

[Zilara12]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

The percentage you get on bctalkaccountpricer.info is not accurate. It is just an estimate of the number of words you usually make in a post. A constructive post doesn't necessarily has to be long or an essay. A one sentence post or even a two word explanation is constructive as long as it is on topic, it is substantial, it has thought and it is original.

Yeah,i thought those % stats are probably not accurate/relevant. Thank you

[Patatas]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

Your post quality is terrible and I'm wondering why is your account not banned yet for posting multiple times in a row in the same thread.Maybe ban is the harsh word but you're one of the other 100 Shit Posters from the gambling section which actually doesn't contribute to even 10% of the actual forum discussions.Its a breeding hub for Signature Posters.

[Zilara12]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

Your post quality is terrible and I'm wondering why is your account not banned yet for posting multiple times in a row in the same thread.Maybe ban is the harsh word but you're one of the other 100 Shit Posters from the gambling section which actually doesn't contribute to even 10% of the actual forum discussions.Its a breeding hub for Signature Posters.

That esculated quickly,thanks for the response .

[stiffbud]

It's surprising that gianluca has accepted you in sportsbets campaign.
I myself tried enrolling in another campaign that he is managing but he decided to deny my application claiming that my post quality is not constructive enough. Your posts are worst than mine. What is Gianlucas basis of a constructive post? Maybe he is just allowing users who he personally know to participate rather the ones who trully deserves the slot.

[Rizky Aditya]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

The percentage you get on bctalkaccountpricer.info is not accurate. It is just an estimate of the number of words you usually make in a post. A constructive post doesn't necessarily has to be long or an essay. A one sentence post or even a two word explanation is constructive as long as it is on topic, it is substantial, it has thought and it is original.

Yeah but most of the time, a longer post is a more constructive and overall better post. A one liner is considered as spam to most people. Saying that, I think that the percentage is quite inaccurate seeing as I got a 95% and my posts aren't even that good. You can't really trust it.

[BitHodler]

It's surprising that gianluca has accepted you in sportsbets campaign.
I myself tried enrolling in another campaign that he is managing but he decided to deny my application claiming that my post quality is not constructive enough. Your posts are worst than mine. What is Gianlucas basis of a constructive post? Maybe he is just allowing users who he personally know to participate rather the ones who trully deserves the slot.

I have also applied for a spot in one of the campaigns he is managing, but I got rejected two times without a reason of why I am not able to enter the campaign he is managing.

All this while I see he is accepting people with obvious signature posting behavior. With that I mean that some people have been waiting with posting till they got accepted by him.

It's not really a problem to get rejected but it doesn't feel good while people with worse post quality get a spot while you with decent post quality don't make it there.

[jacee]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

The percentage you get on bctalkaccountpricer.info is not accurate. It is just an estimate of the number of words you usually make in a post. A constructive post doesn't necessarily has to be long or an essay. A one sentence post or even a two word explanation is constructive as long as it is on topic, it is substantial, it has thought and it is original.

Yeah but most of the time, a longer post is a more constructive and overall better post. A one liner is considered as spam to most people. Saying that, I think that the percentage is quite inaccurate seeing as I got a 95% and my posts aren't even that good. You can't really trust it.

I have to disagree on that. Most posts I see from signature spammers around the forum are long posts that doesn't even make sense. I think 98% of people here are of those who make those "long" posts and they are just pointing out the same thing over and over and just trying to lengthen their posts. IMO the simpler the explanation is, the more constructive it is.

[Rizky Aditya]

I was just being curios what is "decent" post quality. I have around 77% so asking you guys if that is good enough

The percentage you get on bctalkaccountpricer.info is not accurate. It is just an estimate of the number of words you usually make in a post. A constructive post doesn't necessarily has to be long or an essay. A one sentence post or even a two word explanation is constructive as long as it is on topic, it is substantial, it has thought and it is original.

Yeah but most of the time, a longer post is a more constructive and overall better post. A one liner is considered as spam to most people. Saying that, I think that the percentage is quite inaccurate seeing as I got a 95% and my posts aren't even that good. You can't really trust it.

I have to disagree on that. Most posts I see from signature spammers around the forum are long posts that doesn't even make sense. I think 98% of people here are of those who make those "long" posts and they are just pointing out the same thing over and over and just trying to lengthen their posts. IMO the simpler the explanation is, the more constructive it is.

That is quite true but after a while, people have nothing to write about and they are just trying to make some money.(including me) But I still think that short posts are generally spam and longer posts have more information, even if it is just repeating what other people said.

[jacee]

That is quite true but after a while, people have nothing to write about and they are just trying to make some money.(including me)

That is basically just spamming.
That is every spammers mindset. They post for the sake of earning and as a result, they are no longer contributing in the community..

But I still think that short posts are generally spam and longer posts have more information, even if it is just repeating what other people said.

Still spam. But oh well, we have a freedom to do what we want and say what we want in this forum.

[krunox123]

But oh well, we have a freedom to do what we want and say what we want in this forum.

No, that's entirely false. You can't just do whatever you want or say anything you want in this forum because there is still a set of rules that has to be followed by everyone.