Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:28:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Ether hacker problem: soft or hardfork?  (Read 345 times)
yoona (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 250


Live by your own rules


View Profile
June 20, 2016, 09:42:16 PM
 #1

Well I have to admit that the concept of these soft-/hardfork are fairly new to me, and that the proper concept and use of ETH is something I'm still getting into, but considering the DAO/ETH hacker problem, why would you not softwork the protocol where the funds (the transaction/blocks wherein his eth was moved) of the hacker are blocked?

(This might be a stupid question considering I don't understand the contracts in eth as I should, but does anyone have a proper explanation somewhere? I have been googling for a while now, but other than the fact that you can upload 'small programs' to the eth blockchain, I don't quite get the point, or the use of the contracts yet... Thanks in advance :p )
Seggbek Ur
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2016, 09:44:02 PM
 #2

I think the hard fork is the best option.
yoona (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 250


Live by your own rules


View Profile
June 20, 2016, 09:54:13 PM
 #3

I think the hard fork is the best option.
okay, but how does that solve the problem of the 'stolen' coins being retrieved from the hacker?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!