Charles our community desperately needs you (or someone) to bring back the Bitcoin University:
Specifying an ideal by specifying the absence of whatever properties does not mean much to me tbh, it is all secondary and/or irrelevant.
Your only ideal specified here is "launching a token system fairly yet also funding the developer." which is very very vague to me. If that is all it is, then I would say just code something that someone wants to pay you for. Software industry is not bad to be in - in terms of pay - and still absorbing more and more devs
.
Thank you for your post, as you enabled me to see where I have not communicated to those who lack background understanding of the issues.
The ideal specified in the OP is to have a consensus+distribution system that:
- doesn't centralize
- doesn't allow voting or consensus to drive a fork, which violates the permissionless, trustless requirement (the entire reason that block chains exist otherwise we could use corporation and a database)
- doesn't create a manipulated money supply distribution
- doesn't end up as just another fiat system because it is controlled
- doesn't end up implementing MIT's CoinAnchor which will force us all to present our 666 id when we transact
- doesn't create the moral hazard of and complete loss of trust in the block chain by bailing users of the system, e.g. Ethereum forking to bailout the Too Big To Fail DAO.
Have you been sleeping under a rock while the Ethereum/DAO fiasco has occurred?
You seem to not understand how the ideals specified in the OP pertain to avoiding a fiasco like that. I suggest you click all the links in the OP and get the full flavor of what is driving these ideals.
Sorry to speak to you this way and apologies if I am overreacting to your erroneous use of the words "secondary", "irrelevant" and "your only ideal", but it is amazingly frustrating when instead of asking a question about the relevance of the OP, you make smug (
and frankly speaking, slightly condescending although you did admit it is all "vague" to you) statements which are clueless as if you don't even understand anything about why Satoshi invented a block chain.
We seriously need someone to launch a Block Chain University. There are far too many speculators who are ignorant about what they are speculating on.