Bitcoin Forum
July 23, 2024, 03:27:05 PM *
News: Help 1Dq create 15th anniversary forum artwork.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Higher low  (Read 749 times)
puck2 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234
Merit: 105



View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:27:49 AM
 #1

AndyRossy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:30:04 AM
 #2

Thanks?
NamelessOne
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:31:14 AM
 #3

Same chart has a lower high. HAHA
puck2 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234
Merit: 105



View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:32:19 AM
 #4

Same chart has a lower high. HAHA

I generally look at support on spikes for higher lows.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:50:01 AM
 #5

Yesterday's low was $36.65 and last week was ~$33.30.
Higher, yes but your chart is not showing the actual lows.

Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 2162


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
March 13, 2013, 12:51:04 AM
 #6



I used to play that game on the Vic 20

1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Ichthyo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2013, 01:15:21 AM
 #7

I generally look at support on spikes for higher lows.

Not sure if there is any point in looking at those spikes. In both cases, the Mt.Gox API lag became so high that the exchange was basically unreachable. In both cases, the turn up happened right after that happening. Yesterday's low was unreachable for a huge number of people. Over the Mt.Gox web page, the lowest values visible were just above $40. Any values observed during such a situation are highly arbitrary and random artefacts, created by irrelevant external circumstances in no way linked to the proper functioning of a market.

Thus, realistically speaking, in both cases actually no low values do exist whatsoever. Any numbers accidentally observed have to be pruned. We should not build any hypotheses on such non-existent numbers and we should not link them to any other observations, relations or conclusions.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2013, 01:31:33 AM
 #8

I wonder what next week's crash low will be.

First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders  Of course we accept bitcoin.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!