data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
March 15, 2013, 08:57:47 PM Last edit: March 15, 2013, 09:52:04 PM by xorxor |
|
tested!!! I can confirm a very effective pool!!!!! aggresive vardiff set my difficulty at 256 so traffic is minimal.
cant imagine why there are so much people on notroll , when we got these:
give-me-ltc.com 2% and 10 confirm only no invalids , now at 98 -2 = 96% efficiency coinotron.com 2% 120 confirms + some inv , now at 96 -2 = 94% efficiency litecoinpool.org 5% pps no inv , now at 98 -5 +2 = 95% 93% efficiency coinotron.com 3.5% pps + some inv , now at 95-3.5 = 91,5% efficiency
eficiency gap
ozcoin DGM 2% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 87% efficiency notroll.in 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency ozcoin pps 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency burnside 0% + oh s**t! stales and invalids rejects [20 - 100%] around 75% efficiency
everything tested on the same rigs [7000kh] same settings and software, fast connection and long testing times - days [pplns/rbpps] / hours [pps]
edit:
after some longer testing looks like stales are not paid , calculator says 1558kh should give 18,606 ltc a day , after 100k shares and 2% stales @ 5% fee im heading to 17,24 a day, its a 93% efficiency, cant see those stales paid
|