fachant (OP)
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 252
Moonbet.io | Web3 Casino
|
 |
July 04, 2016, 02:16:49 AM |
|
What do you think: which wallet is better and why - MultiBit (classic) or MultiBit HD?
Ps. I know, that this thread is about online wallets, but i think that this is better place for topic like this then general service thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinSupremo
|
|
July 04, 2016, 07:32:06 AM |
|
Both are very good wallets and you are in charge of your bitcoins in the sense that you are not relying on third party service to hold your bitcoins.
However Multibit HD is a bit more secure in the sense that it uses a SEED and as long as you are installing it on a clean PC writing down your seed to some protected document and then keeping it on a safe place your wallet is with top security. It also uses a new address every time which is more privacy concerned so it is better. Also the fact that Multibit classic is not supported anymore (as far as I know 0.5.19 is last version but I maybe wrong about this) is also a fact that notes that the HD version is better.
|
|
|
|
|
Hazir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
|
|
July 04, 2016, 02:01:14 PM |
|
Couple things to know:
1, Multibit HD is evolution of 'standard' Multibit wallet and old wallet is not longer supported.
Developers thought that HD (hierarchical deterministic) wallets will be better for users compared to the existing random key wallets.
Users were losing their private keys and there were errors caused by importing and exporting private keys.
2. HD wallet do whatever deterministic wallets do and has native Trezor support BUT MultiBit HD isn't supporting the existing MultiBit random key wallets.
3. Multibit Classic is not going to be updated with any new code or features - it is only maintained for things like network access and possible fee changes.
I would use Multibit HD - as Classic version is old, not fully supported and HD features of new wallet are really nice.
|
|
|
|
|
SANALIU
|
|
July 27, 2016, 12:44:25 AM |
|
iam choose multibit classic
because iam not familiar with multibit HD
multibit HD can change addres without i want change same with new blockchain info with addres HD
addres can change without i want change
|
|
|
|
|
|
zenitzz
|
|
July 29, 2016, 10:53:21 AM |
|
What do you think: which wallet is better and why - MultiBit (classic) or MultiBit HD?
Ps. I know, that this thread is about online wallets, but i think that this is better place for topic like this then general service thread.
Multibit classic more easy to use than multibit HD because i've check that both wallet even i'm not using as my wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
andyste
|
|
July 30, 2016, 02:24:45 PM |
|
iam choose multibit HD
why iam chosee multibit HD. because now is era wallet HD, wallet online migrate to HD wallet
is blokchain too wallet HD, new wallet is wallet HD not old use wallet again, is
old wallet is diference space and room in new wallet, if iam not follow HD next time maybe iam very dificult is use wallet bitcoin
|
|
|
|
|
Dark.Angel
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2016, 04:08:45 AM |
|
I choose multibit HD because more easy, fast and simple. I think if we use multibit HD also full secure because need more than 1 confirmation. So, I leave to use multibit classic.
|
|
|
|
|
imissyou
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2016, 05:24:27 AM |
|
iam use aboth
iam not familiar multibit HD but iam must learn because next time is all wallet can use HD wallet system
|
|
|
|
|
Sontoloyo
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 19, 2016, 09:20:10 AM |
|
for now, i still using MultiBit, because i more belived, as my experiences when i using MultiBit HD my mozilla browser is long for loading and processed, and then i turn to google chrome also same
|
|
|
|
|
|
andyste
|
|
August 20, 2016, 03:54:57 AM |
|
I choose multibit HD because more easy, fast and simple. I think if we use multibit HD also full secure because need more than 1 confirmation. So, I leave to use multibit classic.
HD wallet i think is very dificult, because HD wallet system addres always chance and multibit HD its computer spec must window 64 , its 32 not run can not use multibit HD |
|
|
|
|
Sontoloyo
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 26, 2016, 10:36:04 AM |
|
HD wallet i think is very dificult, because HD wallet system addres always chance
and multibit HD its computer spec must window 64 , its 32 not run can not use multibit HD
For small (not more 1 BTC) and frequently transaction is good using for multibit HD, but for more security I suggest to use old version. |
|
|
|
|
CoinCidental
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
October 26, 2016, 11:15:49 AM |
|
HD wallet i think is very dificult, because HD wallet system addres always chance
and multibit HD its computer spec must window 64 , its 32 not run can not use multibit HD
For small (not more 1 BTC) and frequently transaction is good using for multibit HD, but for more security I suggest to use old version. Why not use the new one?? |
|
|
|
|
fachant (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 252
Moonbet.io | Web3 Casino
|
|
October 27, 2016, 11:51:50 PM |
|
HD wallet i think is very dificult, because HD wallet system addres always chance
and multibit HD its computer spec must window 64 , its 32 not run can not use multibit HD
For small (not more 1 BTC) and frequently transaction is good using for multibit HD, but for more security I suggest to use old version. Usually newest versions have better security. I'm using old MultiBit, but i have little issues with him and i want change now for HD.. but now im confused.. Can you tell a bit more about differences in security? |
|
|
|
|
