◥ 🌟 🌟 (PAUSED - RE ANN COMING) VITA | POS | ICO (LOOKING FOR ESCROW) 🌟 🌟 ◣

[KeenMiner]

Launch at: Wednesday, 13th July 2016 at 9:30:00 PM   EDT   UTC-4 hours

BONUS: First 5 investors* will receive double Vita at the cost of us!

https://i.imgur.com/xqciNQy.jpg


Early investor opportunity closes at 9th of July exactly 96 hours before launch.
ICO address: 1DjqM3rb1imHDrHu4ZeVaAmQ9xZhcHxjcJ

We are looking for an escrow!

To be allocated coins please PM Tx ID and amount of Vita purchased, if there are multiple people claiming a transaction a signed message will be required else a refund to the address will be issued.

* Investors who invest minimum 0.02 BTC

Ledger to be posted below:

[prikitiw]

ICO again azzz 

[Perryl]

So many ICO. lol

[KeenMiner]

ICO again azzz  

So many ICO. lol

Unfortunately many people do not like ICO's although we do see it as the best way to create a successful currency!

[robelneo]

It doesn't show transparency,an escrow is needed for this kind of Ico or much more better if you held your Ico on exchange for a more transparent transactions,people are now full and over with so many Ico which in the end the investors are the one losing..

[KeenMiner]

It doesn't show transparency,an escrow is needed for this kind of Ico or much more better if you held your Ico on exchange for a more transparent transactions,people are now full and over with so many Ico which in the end the investors are the one losing..

We fully agree escrow should be a major part of an ICO. We are now looking for someone (Or an exchange) appropriate to host the ICO.
We are also of the opinion however that having access to atleast partial ICO money pre and at launch would be beneficial for paying things like bounties (Yet to be posted) and paying for full time nodes etc.

[prikitiw]

ICO again azzz  

So many ICO. lol

Unfortunately many people do not like ICO's although we do see it as the best way to create a successful currency!

yes much stuck d ICO
sometimes does not match promise 

[Perryl]

ICO again azzz  

So many ICO. lol

Unfortunately many people do not like ICO's although we do see it as the best way to create a successful currency!

I just didn't have anything interesting to say and wanted to quote your OP so people could see it. lol

[KeenMiner]

You have a new message dev

Thankyou for your offer, we will get back to you once bounties have been posted.

[rindo]

lets see there who will take for escrow,actually im interested about this project

[KeenMiner]

lets see there who will take for escrow,actually im interested about this project

Thanks for your interest, we are open to suggestions in regards to someone acting as an escrow. We also urge investors to understand that whilst we support escrow completely, direct investments give us the ability to have and host more launch day services and have higher bounties available etc.

[dearbesz1219]

The information of yours here in this thread was not totally complete,..
I think your not transparent to your investor actually, I also noticed that you don't have any procedure of how are we gonna do to invest to your project for us not to think any doubt in programs.

[operabit]

ICO again? I hope success

[lootz]

Hmmm ico?

[electronicash]

This coin doesn't have any special feature yet you planned to pull out a roadmap for mass adoption? you definitely want to hit big.
You could have just take over a dead coin to save you from hiring a dev.

[CjMapope]

you realize there's literally nothing here right? just a buncha words about what 99% of coins do, VITA will also, yay?

no features, no real plan except the same old. (make a marketplace, get on exchanges, blah blah we hear it everyday, everycoin)
and promises of "MORE TO COME" if you can just get our BTC to fund it ;p

what makes this coin different from say , ANY other?

you don't even have a website, your an anon newbie dev who wants 12+BTC for nothing.

this crap never ceases to amaze me....

spelling errors in OP, bonus for first 5 investors (big bait red flag), small-ass fine print on the OP

NOPE, not for me, sorry.

[KeenMiner]

The information of yours here in this thread was not totally complete,..
I think your not transparent to your investor actually, I also noticed that you don't have any procedure of how are we gonna do to invest to your project for us not to think any doubt in programs.

What do you mean by not complete? And how come you don't believe we are transparent? We will be labeling and publicly detailing every transaction of the ICO. The method to investing has been outlined above.

[KeenMiner]

you realize there's literally nothing here right? just a buncha words about what 99% of coins do, VITA will also, yay?

no features, no real plan except the same old. (make a marketplace, get on exchanges, blah blah we hear it everyday, everycoin)
and promises of "MORE TO COME" if you can just get our BTC to fund it ;p

what makes this coin different from say , ANY other?

you don't even have a website, your an anon newbie dev who wants 12+BTC for nothing.

this crap never ceases to amaze me....

spelling errors in OP, bonus for first 5 investors (big bait red flag), small-ass fine print on the OP

NOPE, not for me, sorry.

This coin doesn't have any special feature yet you planned to pull out a roadmap for mass adoption? you definitely want to hit big.
You could have just take over a dead coin to save you from hiring a dev.

We are sorry you feel this way, although we do believe our multi-coin wallet and coin specific exchange are features that others do not. We also have strong future plans that haven't yet been outlined as the plan was to judge what could be done after the ICO was complete. Which spelling errors did you find? They can easily be fixed.

As for our plan for mass adoption we believe the first step is to build up trust in the community before moving to a broader world based approach. Other coins (Think barbecue and other weed coins) have tried to jump straight into the real world with little success, coins similar to litecoin, dash and doge coin have all built up a loyal following which also happen to be the coins with the highest market cap.

[CjMapope]

you realize there's literally nothing here right? just a buncha words about what 99% of coins do, VITA will also, yay?

no features, no real plan except the same old. (make a marketplace, get on exchanges, blah blah we hear it everyday, everycoin)
and promises of "MORE TO COME" if you can just get our BTC to fund it ;p

what makes this coin different from say , ANY other?

you don't even have a website, your an anon newbie dev who wants 12+BTC for nothing.

this crap never ceases to amaze me....

spelling errors in OP, bonus for first 5 investors (big bait red flag), small-ass fine print on the OP

NOPE, not for me, sorry.

This coin doesn't have any special feature yet you planned to pull out a roadmap for mass adoption? you definitely want to hit big.
You could have just take over a dead coin to save you from hiring a dev.

We are sorry you feel this way, although we do believe our multi-coin wallet and coin specific exchange are features that others do not. We also have strong future plans that haven't yet been outlined as the plan was to judge what could be done after the ICO was complete. Which spelling errors did you find? They can easily be fixed.

As for our plan for mass adoption we believe the first step is to build up trust in the community before moving to a broader world based approach. Other coins (Think barbecue and other weed coins) have tried to jump straight into the real world with little success, coins similar to litecoin, dash and doge coin have all built up a loyal following which also happen to be the coins with the highest market cap.

hmm, well i commend you answering me in a constructive approach, i do agree in that these "bbq &weed" stupid theme shitcoins are going about it the wrong way.
i am a miner, so it will be hard to wrestle my BTC from me close to this halving , but will definitely be watching this with a more positive attitude, as i do like your answer above, i think its more realistic approach for sure.
as for spelling error, i specifically just mean't the word "fundsw" (should be "funds") under ICO section. but im just a stickler , tho i believe it shows a priority to throwing down an ANN or looking 100% professional and serious, as those who release solid projects tend to read their "whitepapers" over and over, and over.. and the OP is about the closest i see to a "whitepaper" here
Wish you luck, i will watch for this on exchanges

[KeenMiner]

you realize there's literally nothing here right? just a buncha words about what 99% of coins do, VITA will also, yay?

no features, no real plan except the same old. (make a marketplace, get on exchanges, blah blah we hear it everyday, everycoin)
and promises of "MORE TO COME" if you can just get our BTC to fund it ;p

what makes this coin different from say , ANY other?

you don't even have a website, your an anon newbie dev who wants 12+BTC for nothing.

this crap never ceases to amaze me....

spelling errors in OP, bonus for first 5 investors (big bait red flag), small-ass fine print on the OP

NOPE, not for me, sorry.

This coin doesn't have any special feature yet you planned to pull out a roadmap for mass adoption? you definitely want to hit big.
You could have just take over a dead coin to save you from hiring a dev.

We are sorry you feel this way, although we do believe our multi-coin wallet and coin specific exchange are features that others do not. We also have strong future plans that haven't yet been outlined as the plan was to judge what could be done after the ICO was complete. Which spelling errors did you find? They can easily be fixed.

As for our plan for mass adoption we believe the first step is to build up trust in the community before moving to a broader world based approach. Other coins (Think barbecue and other weed coins) have tried to jump straight into the real world with little success, coins similar to litecoin, dash and doge coin have all built up a loyal following which also happen to be the coins with the highest market cap.

hmm, well i commend you answering me in a constructive approach, i do agree in that these "bbq &weed" stupid theme shitcoins are going about it the wrong way.
i am a miner, so it will be hard to wrestle my BTC from me close to this halving , but will definitely be watching this with a more positive attitude, as i do like your answer above, i think its more realistic approach for sure.
as for spelling error, i specifically just mean't the word "fundsw" (should be "funds") under ICO section. but im just a stickler , tho i believe it shows a priority to throwing down an ANN or looking 100% professional and serious, as those who release solid projects tend to read their "whitepapers" over and over, and over.. and the OP is about the closest i see to a "whitepaper" here
Wish you luck, i will watch for this on exchanges

Thankyou for understanding the position we are in! The error will be amended ASAP, if required we would be happy to push back the official launch date and ICO dates in order to further display and show potential investors the plan for the future such as crating a whitepaper. On a separate note do you feel Vita is missing any features that would be worthwhile for it's growth and development?