Excuse me, lauda
As I have said before, I have improved the quality of my post, so today I am here and want you to rethink the quality of my post. I believe it's really good, and I hope you too. Most importantly, I expect you to remove my name in the blacklist.
Thank you!
Regards
Pau
First and foremost, it's only been a week.
"Rules specific to Laudas list:
If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 30 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread."
This is a rough estimate, but I would say that of all the bitcoin that I have acquired, approximately 95% of it I bought. The other 5% or so I earned through gambling - poker and sports betting. Also a tiny, less than 1% from sig/ava campaign. I don't do any trading.
A legendary member, I suppose you have earned a lot of bitcoin from avatar campaigns. But it only accounts for 1%. This makes me think you are very rich. I never buy bitcoin, I only join signature campaigns and earn money from that job. I wish i can trade coin like you.
Are you saying that this is a quality post? You're just repeating what you quoted.
That's the right thing to do as if you are buying them regularly then you are making a good investment that can secure your future as price is expected to go higher in future and if you have good amount of bitcoins in your wallet then it will give you best returns on your investments.
The price of bitcoin may actually increase in the future, but there are many risks if you invest in bitcoin as a stock. There are many possible risks, we should calculate carefully. Myself, I do not buy bitcoin, otherwise I always sell it for cash, because that is safe, there is not any risk if you own cash.
And this one too? What are the possible risks, exactly? And what do you mean by, "Myself, I do not buy bitcoin, otherwise I always sell it for cash"? This is a bit contradictory, is it not?
Freedom is the strength and weakness of bitcoin. It is easily exploited to commit violent acts, many articles have been written about this before. Bitcoin is used in money laundering, illegal trading and transportation of illegal goods. Bitcoin is used as a tool to carry out offenses. That is a very bad thing for a coin. Its reputation is greatly affected.
How about this one? You really believe that this is useful after 500+ replies to the thread?
Those people who dont like bitcoin has a view that Bitcoin has the drawback, as well as most others alts that there is the need for confirmations before it can be a trusted TX, and that makes it harder to use as a currency
As your opinion, it is not difficult to solve, otherwise, it is really easy. If you are really a bitcoin enthusiast, you will understand the advantages of it, so explain and analyze for those who know bitcoin. I believe that if you do that, they will change their mind and accept bitcoin
This is post #394.
Bitcoin continues to establish as a,strongest and the most valuable cryptocurrency. This hasn't come over knight and can't be replaced over knight but at the moment I also can't see that some other cryptocurrency has the potential to go through that way and take Bitcoin's position.
I wouldn't say it's impossibe but it will not happen for a long time.
Altcoins are growing stronger and stronger than before, however, only really powerful altocoins are able to compete with bitcoin, as most altcoins are copied from bitcoin, but are used with a different name. . Only a few altcoins are fully developed. And those altcoins are really powerful, they have absolutely a chance to compete fairly with bitcoin. But bitcoin is really too powerful, it has taken over all other altcoins from the moment it is formed.
It's unclear what you're trying to say here. "most altcoins are copied from bitcoin, but are used with a different name" is not absolutely true. "they have absolutely a chance to compete fairly with bitcoin. But bitcoin is really too powerful, it has taken over all other altcoins from the moment it is formed." contradicts itself.
Banks are not afraid of any crypto and especially the bitcoin because it is primarily used as asset, that is as a commodity and rarely as a currency. The same happens with the gold. As franky1 above said the fiat are not lost when people use their coins, just has changed hands (bank accounts). If ever banks loose their profit then we will understand how they will react.
No, I suppose you were wrong. Bitcoin is really a challenge for banks, because its value is not real, it depends entirely on other currencies, which are issued by the government. The risk of bankruptcy always clings to banks if they accept bitcoin. That is true, and most banks accept bitcoin as government-led banks.
This is more of an accuracy issue that I have (though is still the 38th post of the thread): it is true that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value but it does not at all fully depend on other currencies. The same can be said of FIAT currencies. I'm not sure what the last sentence is for, though. "That is true, and most banks accept bitcoin as government-led banks." is a strange statement.
I could go on and on and talk about the posts in more depth but that would be a waste. Again, length does not mean substance.
If I have a long essay that repeats the exact same points over and over again, being redundant - or better yet, paraphrasing previously-published essays, then it's completely pointless and adds nothing.
