Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2020, 07:23:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)  (Read 99465 times)
Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 12:57:44 AM
 #221

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

COYB
1579461793
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579461793

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579461793
Reply with quote  #2

1579461793
Report to moderator
1579461793
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579461793

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579461793
Reply with quote  #2

1579461793
Report to moderator
1579461793
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579461793

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579461793
Reply with quote  #2

1579461793
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1867


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 01:21:34 AM
Last edit: December 02, 2016, 01:43:38 AM by actmyname
 #222

If this guy speaks Russian at home and cannot speak English fluently then is it a bad thing he doesn't post in English sections? Sounds counter intuitive to me

Sorry that there's a rule that requires you to post in multiple sections over the week. I sincerely apologize to all those who wish to join campaigns but cannot because they are in English.

I also feel self-pity for not being able to be a Chinese diplomat because I can't speak Chinese.


Actmyname, my man, that one sailed right over your noodle.  I think QS is saying it is in fact a good thing that peeps with a poor command of English don't post in the English section.   But who knows.  I can't claim to know what QS' s thought processes are, and sarcasm/sardonicism don't get received well on this forum.

Right. Perhaps if there were local board-based campaigns for the most common languages used by spammers, that would decrease the amount of poor English we see in the general sections? (Maybe. Probably not; hungry account farmers would simply create more)

The Pharmacist
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1764
Merit: 3274



View Profile
December 02, 2016, 01:33:19 AM
 #223

If this guy speaks Russian at home and cannot speak English fluently then is it a bad thing he doesn't post in English sections? Sounds counter intuitive to me

Sorry that there's a rule that requires you to post in multiple sections over the week. I sincerely apologize to all those who wish to join campaigns but cannot because they are in English.

I also feel self-pity for not being able to be a Chinese diplomat because I can't speak Chinese.
Actmyname, my man, that one sailed right over your noodle.  I think QS is saying it is in fact a good thing that peeps with a poor command of English don't post in the English section.   But who knows.  I can't claim to know what QS' s thought processes are, and sarcasm/sardonicism don't get received well on this forum.

TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 959



View Profile
December 02, 2016, 01:36:09 AM
 #224

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  

Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 01:52:40 AM
 #225

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

COYB
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 959



View Profile
December 02, 2016, 02:03:45 AM
 #226

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

I think those are both very good reasons to add them to the list.

It's not black listing them from the forum.  Just from getting paid to post.

If they are only making the post bc they're in a signature campaign, I have no sympathy.
Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 02:14:23 AM
 #227

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

I think those are both very good reasons to add them to the list.

It's not black listing them from the forum.  Just from getting paid to post.

If they are only making the post bc they're in a signature campaign, I have no sympathy.

So only english users should get paid for their posts then?
And only long posts are constructive?

COYB
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 959



View Profile
December 02, 2016, 02:21:11 AM
 #228

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

I think those are both very good reasons to add them to the list.

It's not black listing them from the forum.  Just from getting paid to post.

If they are only making the post bc they're in a signature campaign, I have no sympathy.

So only english users should get paid for their posts then?
And only long posts are constructive?

The language doesn't matter, as long as they aren't shit at it.

And yeah, constructive too.
Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 02:38:07 AM
 #229

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

I think those are both very good reasons to add them to the list.

It's not black listing them from the forum.  Just from getting paid to post.

If they are only making the post bc they're in a signature campaign, I have no sympathy.

So only english users should get paid for their posts then?
And only long posts are constructive?

The language doesn't matter, as long as they aren't shit at it.

And yeah, constructive too.
you should go ahead and read your posts, you arent making any sense

COYB
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 959



View Profile
December 02, 2016, 03:47:43 AM
 #230

@YPIIV- you should go back and read your posts in this thread some time.  You're not making any sense.
Let me clarify, SMAS is a good idea but the execution is poor

Are you saying they're being too strict?

I'm not an expert on sig campaigns, but imo (which could change) they would benefit from being way more heavy handed with the bans.  If you're going to get paid to post, don't post shit. (not saying this to anyone in particular) If you post shit, even if it's only semi-shit, you get neg rep and youre done.  It's not like there's any shortage of sig campaign members to choose from, right?  (or is there?)  

Right now way too much of the overall sig campaign money is going to a few shit posters with a ton of accounts.  


Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong

I think those are both very good reasons to add them to the list.

It's not black listing them from the forum.  Just from getting paid to post.

If they are only making the post bc they're in a signature campaign, I have no sympathy.

So only english users should get paid for their posts then?
And only long posts are constructive?

The language doesn't matter, as long as they aren't shit at it.

And yeah, constructive too.
you should go ahead and read your posts, you arent making any sense

It doesn't make sense to you why people who sign up for a signature campaign in a language they can barely speak get blacklisted for making short posts that are barely legible? 
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1781



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2016, 04:02:07 AM
 #231

If this guy speaks Russian at home and cannot speak English fluently then is it a bad thing he doesn't post in English sections? Sounds counter intuitive to me

Sorry that there's a rule that requires you to post in multiple sections over the week. I sincerely apologize to all those who wish to join campaigns but cannot because they are in English.

I also feel self-pity for not being able to be a Chinese diplomat because I can't speak Chinese.


Actmyname, my man, that one sailed right over your noodle.  I think QS is saying it is in fact a good thing that peeps with a poor command of English don't post in the English section.   But who knows.  I can't claim to know what QS' s thought processes are, and sarcasm/sardonicism don't get received well on this forum.

Right. Perhaps if there were local board-based campaigns for the most common languages used by spammers, that would decrease the amount of poor English we see in the general sections? (Maybe. Probably not; hungry account farmers would simply create more)
Well why don't you think about it like this, the guy who was blacklisted because he wasn't posting in enough sections but might not speak very good English so not posting a lot out of the Russian sections means he won't be posting a lot in a language that is not his native language (e.g., few/no shit posts). BTW there are roughly 15 subsections in the Russian board, most of which appear to be very active. Also, bitmixer's (the specific company's signature campaign he was banned from) business is most likely wanting business from Russian members, so it makes little sense to exclude non English speaking users (especially those that don't speak languages heavily associated with spammers).

Happy New Year!
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 2270


Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile
December 02, 2016, 07:27:01 AM
Last edit: December 02, 2016, 08:52:22 AM by Lauda
 #232

IMHO blatantly constantly breaking signature campaign rules also warrants a place on the blacklist, even if your posts are not that bad. I have split my initial blacklist into two because of this though.
I disagree, depending on the rule. The BitSler campaign has the rule
Quote
75 characters minimum

Some of my posts are under that, and I understand I won't be paid for them, but getting SMAS blacklisted?
You've missed my point. The way that posts get counted is not really a rule (i.e. X characters minimum). I'm talking more about, e.g. 'no alts', 'posting in specified sections' and so on. One should consciously join a campaign and follow all of its rules.

Alot of users are added to the list because their posts are short or because their english is poor, this reasoning is wrong
No, it is not. It is our list, ergo determined by our rules. You forgot to add a 'IMO' at the end of that sentence. Just because you disagree with it, that doesn't make it universally wrong. Anyhow, this is why there is a short review period. In case that someone was really bothered by getting blacklisted, they could just send their campaign manager a PM (which would be a sign of a genuine person). However, usually they rush and apply into other campaigns (which is not a good sign).

It seems this thread is ripe for a self-moderated replacement.

████████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █▀ █▀ ▀██████████
█████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
██████████▀     ▀  ▀████████
███████▀ ▀  ▄█▀▀▀█▀▀████████
██████▄      █▄  ▀▀  ▀██████
██████         ▄▄█▄ ▄ ▀█████
█████ ▄         ▀▀ ▄ ▀ █████
██████▌          █▀█▀ ▐█████
███████  ▄▌         ▄ ██████
████████▄█         ▄████████
█████████▀     ▄▄ ▄█████████
████████████████████████████
.JACKMATE'S...........
.
MAJESTIC..
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
.
..WIN 1 BITCOIN ON EVERY PREMIER LEAGUE MATCHDAY..
████████████████████████████████
████████████▀█▀ ▀█▀█▀███████████
███████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
█████████▀▄ ██▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀█████████
███████▀ ▀█████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████████
███████▀▄████████▀  ▀█ █▐███████
███████ ▀█████████▄█▀▀██ ███████
████████ ███▀██████ ▄ ██ ███████
████████▌▐▀▄ ██████████ ▄███████
█████████▄██▌▐█████▀██ █████████
████████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▀▄██████████
████████████████████████████████
.
.JOIN US - IT'S FREE! .
BlockEye
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1097


Bounty Mngr & Article Writer https://goo.gl/p4Agsh


View Profile
December 03, 2016, 02:35:30 AM
 #233

hello Lauda, I have some question here, If the user is listed on the black list by a certain manager, Is all the manager belongs to SMAS will still review all the account listed by that manager or not? Because all managers have different verdict in each situation, Are you planning to build like council or court so that every manager will evaluate the user that has been suspected that committing violation and to be fair.. Thanks

                    ▄█████████████▄
                 ░██▀             ▀███
               ░██░                  ░██
             ░██░                     ░██░
             ██░                        ██░
            ░█░                         ░██
            ░█░▄████████████▄           ░▐█
           ░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░       ░██
         ░██░██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░     ░█░
        ░█░  ░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░   ░██
       ░█░    ░██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░ ░█░
      ░█░       ███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
      ░█░         ▀████░░░░░░░░░░████░
      ░█░             ▀▀▀██████▀▀  ░█░
      ░██                         ░█░
       ░██                       ░██░
        ░██░                    ░██░
          ░██▄                ░██░
            ▀███▄▄        ▄▄██▀░
                ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀
.

██         ▄█▄      ▄█▄        ▄█▄             ▄█▄              █▄          ▄█▄
██▌         ▀     ▄███         ██▌            █████            ▐████▄       ██▌
██▌              ███▀          ██▌           ███▀███           ▐██▀███▄     ██▌
██▌            ▄███            ██▌          ███   ███          ▐██▌ ▀███▄   ██▌
██▌          ▄██████           ██▌         ███     ▀▀          ▐██▌   ▀███▄▄██▌
██▌         ███   ▀██▄         ██▌        ███                  ▐██▌      ▀████▌
██▌       ▐██▀      ▀██        ██▌       ███         ▐██       ▐██         ▀██▌
████
████
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.
66.6
TRANSACTIONS
█ █  PER SECOND   █ █
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
████
████
████
REDEFINING HOW WE CONNECT
Data Streaming Hybrid-Proof DLT  Blockchain based IM
█ █ GET INVOLVED NOW █ █
Github -    Discord - ANN -    Telegram - Reddit - Twitter 
Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2016, 05:05:10 AM
 #234

hello Lauda, I have some question here, If the user is listed on the black list by a certain manager, Is all the manager belongs to SMAS will still review all the account listed by that manager or not? Because all managers have different verdict in each situation, Are you planning to build like council or court so that every manager will evaluate the user that has been suspected that committing violation and to be fair.. Thanks
Nope, no such plans in place, i suggested something like this earlier in the thread

COYB
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 2270


Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile
December 03, 2016, 08:05:13 AM
 #235

hello Lauda, I have some question here, If the user is listed on the black list by a certain manager, Is all the manager belongs to SMAS will still review all the account listed by that manager or not? Because all managers have different verdict in each situation, Are you planning to build like council or court so that every manager will evaluate the user that has been suspected that committing violation and to be fair.. Thanks
No. I trust the judgement of others managers and expect them to withhold a similar standard as me. However, keep in mind that my campaign is unique. Since I can't deny enrollment, I can only apply someone else's blacklist afterwards. In other words, you'd get reviewed anyways.

████████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █▀ █▀ ▀██████████
█████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
██████████▀     ▀  ▀████████
███████▀ ▀  ▄█▀▀▀█▀▀████████
██████▄      █▄  ▀▀  ▀██████
██████         ▄▄█▄ ▄ ▀█████
█████ ▄         ▀▀ ▄ ▀ █████
██████▌          █▀█▀ ▐█████
███████  ▄▌         ▄ ██████
████████▄█         ▄████████
█████████▀     ▄▄ ▄█████████
████████████████████████████
.JACKMATE'S...........
.
MAJESTIC..
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
.
..WIN 1 BITCOIN ON EVERY PREMIER LEAGUE MATCHDAY..
████████████████████████████████
████████████▀█▀ ▀█▀█▀███████████
███████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
█████████▀▄ ██▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀█████████
███████▀ ▀█████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████████
███████▀▄████████▀  ▀█ █▐███████
███████ ▀█████████▄█▀▀██ ███████
████████ ███▀██████ ▄ ██ ███████
████████▌▐▀▄ ██████████ ▄███████
█████████▄██▌▐█████▀██ █████████
████████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▀▄██████████
████████████████████████████████
.
.JOIN US - IT'S FREE! .
Your Point Is Invalid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 510


Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2016, 09:46:49 PM
 #236

hello Lauda, I have some question here, If the user is listed on the black list by a certain manager, Is all the manager belongs to SMAS will still review all the account listed by that manager or not? Because all managers have different verdict in each situation, Are you planning to build like council or court so that every manager will evaluate the user that has been suspected that committing violation and to be fair.. Thanks
No. I trust the judgement of others managers and expect them to withhold a similar standard as me. However, keep in mind that my campaign is unique. Since I can't deny enrollment, I can only apply someone else's blacklist afterwards. In other words, you'd get reviewed anyways.
I think things would be worse if they held a similar "standard" as you do

COYB
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1867


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2016, 10:00:25 PM
 #237

I think things would be worse if they held a similar "standard" as you do

Although being more strict doesn't always make the majority happy (most of the time it doesn't) it will improve the quality of the forum. Would you rather have a more relaxed signature campaign manager or a more strict one?

Even though we currently probably have a middle-ground, I still think having managers cracking down more often is favorable for the forum in general.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1795


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2016, 11:20:07 PM
 #238

SMAS idea is great, but this topic is pointless. You guys should do this somewhere private or lock/unlock this topic with only updates of spammers, I don't know why did you let this become discussion?

I don't want to be a bitch, but look at this topic for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1694484.0

Now, let see. OP asked question, joksim replied, than op ask another question and mrcash replied and I added few more things.

This is interesting, user27 quote first post and answer to move topic to scam accusation section, than U2 comes and say OP should move topic to scam accusation topic, even c/p my post, than bitmax come with nonsense to discuss scam accusation in marketplace, than thegodfather came to tell to move post to scam board, than Kotone came to say he has to move topic to scam accusation board, than numanoid come to say they are signature spammers, than ardiprabowo came to say he should move his topic to scam accusation.  Grin

Thanks god OP listens to numanoid and he locked topic. (as i said this is only example)

Oh, i found another one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558513 bitmixer signature did someone read his posts?

Oh read this one too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684589.msg16945085#msg16945085  and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684589.msg16994098#msg16994098 who is running bitsler signature campaign anyway  Grin revo is obviously multiacc spammer?

And back to OP, as I said, SMAS is great thing, but you need moderators to do their job too, to lock threads when they are solved and to mute people for several days when they are spamming!

Cheers!










Gunthar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 608


Liable for what i say, not for what you understand


View Profile WWW
December 04, 2016, 12:10:02 AM
 #239

I'm adding SMAS to my lending service: no loans for blacklisted. I will use achow's pricer to check the accounts. Hope it helps to fight spam. I suggest other lenders to do the same as well.
~Gun

       ▄██▀ ▄█████▄
     ▄██▀ ▄███▀ ▐███▄
   ▄██▀ ▄███▀    █████▄
 ▄██▀ ▄███▀    ▄██▀  ▀██▄
██▀ ▄███▀    ▄██▀      ▀██▄
██ ███▀    ▄██▀    █▄    ███
██ ███    ███    ▄███    ███
██ ███▄    ▀███▄███▀     ███
██▄ ▀███▄    ▀███▀    ▄███▀
 ▀██▄ ▀███▄         ▄███▀
   ▀██▄ ▀███▄     ▄███▀
     ▀██▄ ▀███▄ ▄███▀
       ▀██▄ ▀█████▀
████
████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████

████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████

████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████
████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████

████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████

████  ████  ████
████  ████  ████
         ▄█████▄ ▀██▄
       ▄███▀ ▐███▄ ▀██▄
     ▄███▀    █████▄ ▀██▄
   ▄███▀    ▄██▀  ▀██▄ ▀██▄
 ▄███▀    ▄██▀      ▀██▄ ▀██
███▀    ▄██▀    █▄    ███ ██
███    ███    ▄███    ███ ██
███▄    ▀███▄███▀    ▄███ ██
 ▀███▄    ▀███▀    ▄███▀ ▄██
   ▀███▄         ▄███▀ ▄██▀
     ▀███▄     ▄███▀ ▄██▀
       ▀███▄ ▄███▀ ▄██▀
         ▀█████▀ ▄██▀
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 959



View Profile
December 04, 2016, 12:19:05 AM
 #240

I don't want to be a bitch, but look at this topic for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1694484.0

Now, let see. OP asked question, joksim replied, than op ask another question and mrcash replied and I added few more things.

This is interesting, user27 quote first post and answer to move topic to scam accusation section, than U2 comes and say OP should move topic to scam accusation topic, even c/p my post, than bitmax come with nonsense to discuss scam accusation in marketplace, than thegodfather came to tell to move post to scam board, than Kotone came to say he has to move topic to scam accusation board, than numanoid come to say they are signature spammers, than ardiprabowo came to say he should move his topic to scam accusation.  Grin

Thanks god OP listens to numanoid and he locked topic. (as i said this is only example)

Cheers!
I think if everyone who makes a post that's obvious spam like marlboroza's example should be blacklisted permanently from sig campaigns.

Yeah, they will bitch and cry bloody murder from tons of alt accounts.  But there will be less spam.

Zero tolerance - without notice.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!