Bounty for Cracking Bitmain S9 BMminer

[philipma1957]

besides testing successfully I am looking for kano and ck to bless this so to speak.

Going from 1 hidden code to a new hidden code   sounds like "meet the new boss same as the old boss".

I am very good at holding funds and paying them fairly.
I am good at a lot of gear stuff.
I am not a good or even okay coder.

I mention this over and over in the thread simply because I don't want 1.56btc so far to be paid and the code is hidden like bm miner is.

[1715343484]

1715343484

[1715343484]

1715343484

[-ck]

besides testing successfully I am looking for kano and ck to bless this so to speak.

I'm sorry to disappoint you but that's unlikely for either of us. We already briefly posted our issues on this thread but no one seemed to respond to our criticism and we didn't want to rain on fubly's parade when everyone is excited by it so did not push the issue further. If you want to move forward with his code and give him the bounty, you're on your own on deciding whether you're happy or not.

[Subw]

Can i participate?

I already have some experience porting cgminer to S5, also started a project to make a next-gen control panel for ants:

[Xircom]

besides testing successfully I am looking for kano and ck to bless this so to speak.

I'm sorry to disappoint you but that's unlikely for either of us. We already briefly posted our issues on this thread but no one seemed to respond to our criticism and we didn't want to rain on fubly's parade when everyone is excited by it so did not push the issue further. If you want to move forward with his code and give him the bounty, you're on your own on deciding whether you're happy or not.

-ck as I recall Fubly said that this CGminer 4.9.2 should fulfill the GPLv3 license...
I really do not hope I smell some kind of "We are the only ones" kind of thingy
I look through the whole thread again and I cant find any issues re. Fubly having no intentions to fulfill the GPLv3 license. If I got this wrong, please correct me.
I thaught, you and KANO as the last persons ever, would kill a community project, making a lucked product open for everyone and get rid of Bitmain`s BMminer who broke the GPLv3 license ?
Sad, really sad

[-ck]

besides testing successfully I am looking for kano and ck to bless this so to speak.

I'm sorry to disappoint you but that's unlikely for either of us. We already briefly posted our issues on this thread but no one seemed to respond to our criticism and we didn't want to rain on fubly's parade when everyone is excited by it so did not push the issue further. If you want to move forward with his code and give him the bounty, you're on your own on deciding whether you're happy or not.

-ck as I recall Fubly said that this CGminer 4.9.2 should fulfill the GPLv3 license...
I really do not hope I smell some kind of "We are the only ones" kind of thingy
I look through the whole thread again and I cant find any issues re. Fubly having no intentions to fulfill the GPLv3 license. If I got this wrong, please correct me.
I hoped you as the last person ever, would kill a community project, making a lucked product open for everyone and get rid of Bitmain`s BMminer who broke the GPLv3 license ?
Sad, really sad

I never said anything about GPL - that's Kano's concern about fubly's other project and how that code is being applied here.
Read my comment about driver changes. Porting cgminer is only half the work

[Xircom]

Ok, I got that we are not all the way to the goal yet, but from saying you wouldn't give it a green light when finished to saying that some work still have to be done, is a huge difference.
What is needed to make you even consider this project to get to the finish line ? You know that this project is to get rid of Bitmains way of treating us all ?

[Xircom]

Can i participate?

I already have some experience porting cgminer to S5, also started a project to make a next-gen control panel for ants:

Everyone is welcome to bring in ideas. But to begin with, the intention of this Bounty is to make a complete open CGminer v. 4.9.2 according to the GPLv3 license.
That means that we are loyal to the work done by other community members and their hard work. First goal is to keep the miner GUI as is, but replace the BMMiner crap with CGminer 4.9.2, so if you can bring something to the table, please do !

[kano]

Ok, I got that we are not all the way to the goal yet, but from saying you wouldn't give it a green light when finished to saying that some work still have to be done, is a huge difference.
What is needed to make you even consider this project to get to the finish line ? You know that this project is to get rid of Bitmains way of treating us all ?

As I have already posted a number of times ...
fubly is a scammer.
His magic way he posted how his miner version was 16% faster:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1452009.msg14698985#msg14698985
The missing image from that post:
https://www.schulminator.com/sites/default/files/wiki/wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung-bernoulli-wahrscheinlichkeit.PNG

His git fails the cgminer GPLv3 due to hiding code.
I've no idea why anyone would think I would put any support behind someone scamming and breaking the cgminer license ...

[fubly]

Outing Me and telling you now, why I had done this:

I will edit this atm. Stay tuned!


On November or December I asked the community if they want a new firmware, after a short time I had many support (I thought)
some big players offered me to support me and blind as I was I started and thrust them.

The deal was, the same like here, but without any escrow nor nothing.
Make the work, give me the source and I/we will pay you for, publish the work at Github and all is fine!

I was working on this firmware about 1750 hours, I had for 3 month not on cent income nor nothing. After releasing my firmware they all shit me direct into my face!

Now I am pissed off about these guys.

I think the pressure on me SCAMER is now high enough to release also my unpaid work on cgminer 4.9.2. (for Bitmain Antminer S7!)

I will do this within the next 96 hours, if this is ok for you. And please, do not pm me and ask who are this guys.
You all know about how bad some people are on this forum, and yes also me from a point/position/place without
knowing all these shit what happened to me and my family.

I'm so sorry.

fubly

p.s. I some of this guys reading this and fool now bad:

Here you can make your offered payment: 19aST25BBcQyk6JyGScJiZuUbdCMVNMJ4q
 

[Subw]

But to begin with, the intention of this Bounty is to make a complete open CGminer v. 4.9.2 according to the GPLv3 license.
That means that we are loyal to the work done by other community members and their hard work. First goal is to keep the miner GUI as is, but replace the BMMiner crap with CGminer 4.9.2, so if you can bring something to the table, please do !

i understand but the question is who will receive bounty?
for example: two ppl completed the task, what criteria would be used to select the winner?

[NotFuzzyWarm]

Great work here. Thanks for your efforts.
I would also like to see this working on kano.is since that is where I mine exclusively.
Thanks!

I also mine Kano.is and would like to see some test as well. Phil mines Kano as well.

Ditto. I'm Fuzzy there and ever since EMC finally ran out of steam early this year all HP is pointed kano.is as pool 0, their 80 port as fail-over pool1 and lastly have Antpool as fail-over 2.

Glad to see Xircom willing to point some of his serious presence on Kano to test.

Query: Anyone know if Bitmain is playing around with the string voltage vs batches? Just a thought to add.

[kano]

Outing Me and telling you now, why I had done this:

I will edit this atm. Stay tuned!

...
I was working on this firmware about 1750 hours, I had for 3 month ...

19 hours a day non-stop, every day, for 3 month.
Tru story bro!

[fubly]

Outing Me and telling you now, why I had done this:

I will edit this atm. Stay tuned!

...
I was working on this firmware about 1750 hours, I had for 3 month ...

19 hours a day non-stop, every day, for 3 month.
Tru story bro!

Dear Kano,

I did not stop working after 3 month. Working on firmware does not mean working only on cgminer.

Dear Community,

If you send  the bounty to the people who build cgminer 4.9.2, do it. I have no problem with that.

If you want to donate to the Cgminer Developer Team, do it here: 15qSxP1SQcUX3o4nhkfdbgyoWEFMomJ4rZ

I am a scammer, and please never trust a scammer. Kano, is that what you want to here from me now?

Within the next 60 minutes you can download the full source of a fully working Cgminer 4.9.2 for Bitmain's Antminer S9

here: https://github.com/Zwilla/bmminer-master/

p.s. and the Api output is looking atm like this:

Code:

root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master# bmminer-api -o
STATUS=S,When=1472764315,Code=11,Msg=Summary,Description=bmminer 4.9.2|SUMMARY,Elapsed=9940,GHS 5s=0.000000,GHS av=12032.77,MHS av=12032768.33,MHS 5s=11669704.44,MHS 1m=12023262.16,MHS 5m=12062794.06,MHS 15m=12051291.80,Found Blocks=0,Getworks=356,Accepted=246,Rejected=0,Hardware Errors=126,Utility=1.48,Discarded=5334,Stale=0,Get Failures=0,Local Work=441607,Remote Failures=0,Network Blocks=17,Total MH=119610346950.0000,Work Utility=179989.30,Difficulty Accepted=29819382.00000000,Difficulty Rejected=0.00000000,Difficulty Stale=0.00000000,Best Share=36134588,Device Hardware%=0.0004,Device Rejected%=0.0000,Pool Rejected%=0.0000,Pool Stale%=0.0000,Last getwork=1472764315|
root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master#
root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master# bmminer-api -o pools
STATUS=S,When=1472766313,Code=7,Msg=3 Pool(s),Description=bmminer 4.9.2|POOL=0,URL=stratum+tcp://eu.stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333,Status=Alive,Priority=0,Quota=1,Long Poll=N,Getworks=427,Accepted=287,Rejected=0,Works=534587,Discarded=6405,Stale=0,Get Failures=0,Remote Failures=0,User=Zwilla.W94,Last Share Time=1472766191,Diff=121K,Diff1 Shares=0,Proxy Type=,Proxy=,Difficulty Accepted=34789279.00000000,Difficulty Rejected=0.00000000,Difficulty Stale=0.00000000,Last Share Difficulty=121217.00000000,Work Difficulty=121217.00000000,Has Stratum=true,Stratum Active=true,Stratum URL=eu.stratum.bitcoin.cz,Stratum Difficulty=121217.00000000,Has GBT=false,Best Share=36134588,Pool Rejected%=0.0000,Pool Stale%=0.0000,Bad Work=19,Current Block Height=0,Current Block Version=536870912|POOL=1,URL=stratum+tcp://stratum.antpool.com:3333,Status=Alive,Priority=1,Quota=1,Long Poll=N,Getworks=0,Accepted=0,Rejected=0,Works=0,Discarded=0,Stale=0,Get Failures=0,Remote Failures=0,User=bcdzwilla.w94,Last Share Time=0,Diff=,Diff1 Shares=0,Proxy Type=,Proxy=,Difficulty Accepted=0.00000000,Difficulty Rejected=0.00000000,Difficulty Stale=0.00000000,Last Share Difficulty=0.00000000,Work Difficulty=0.00000000,Has Stratum=true,Stratum Active=false,Stratum URL=,Stratum Difficulty=0.00000000,Has GBT=false,Best Share=0,Pool Rejected%=0.0000,Pool Stale%=0.0000,Bad Work=0,Current Block Height=0,Current Block Version=536870912|POOL=2,URL=stratum+tcp://stratum.f2pool.com:3333,Status=Alive,Priority=2,Quota=1,Long Poll=N,Getworks=0,Accepted=0,Rejected=0,Works=0,Discarded=0,Stale=0,Get Failures=0,Remote Failures=0,User=fubly.w20,Last Share Time=0,Diff=4.1K,Diff1 Shares=0,Proxy Type=,Proxy=,Difficulty Accepted=0.00000000,Difficulty Rejected=0.00000000,Difficulty Stale=0.00000000,Last Share Difficulty=0.00000000,Work Difficulty=4096.00000000,Has Stratum=true,Stratum Active=false,Stratum URL=,Stratum Difficulty=0.00000000,Has GBT=false,Best Share=0,Pool Rejected%=0.0000,Pool Stale%=0.0000,Bad Work=0,Current Block Height=0,Current Block Version=536870912|
root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master# 
root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master# 
root@antMiner:~/bmminer-master# bmminer-api -o stats
STATUS=S,When=1472766725,Code=70,Msg=CGMiner stats,Description=bmminer 4.9.2|CGMiner=4.9.2,Miner=4.0.1.0,CompileTime=Wed Jun 8 18:26:47 CST 2016,Type=Antminer S9|STATS=0,ID=BC50,Elapsed=12350,Calls=0,Wait=0.000000,Max=0.000000,Min=99999999.000000,GHS 5s=0.00,GHS av=12036.77,miner_count=3,frequency=650,fan_num=2,fan1=4200,fan2=4320,fan3=0,fan4=0,fan5=0,fan6=0,fan7=0,fan8=0,temp_num=3,temp1=53,temp2=0,temp3=0,temp4=0,temp5=0,temp6=0,temp7=0,temp8=0,temp9=0,temp10=0,temp11=0,temp12=0,temp13=0,temp14=0,temp15=0,temp16=0,temp2_1=0,temp2_2=0,temp2_3=0,temp2_4=0,temp2_5=0,temp2_6=0,temp2_7=0,temp2_8=0,temp2_9=0,temp2_10=0,temp2_11=0,temp2_12=0,temp2_13=0,temp2_14=0,temp2_15=0,temp2_16=0,temp_max=0,Device Hardware%=0.0000,no_matching_work=153,chain_acn1=63,chain_acn2=0,chain_acn3=63,chain_acn4=63,chain_acn5=0,chain_acn6=0,chain_acn7=0,chain_acn8=0,chain_acn9=0,chain_acn10=0,chain_acn11=0,chain_acn12=0,chain_acn13=0,chain_acn14=0,chain_acn15=0,chain_acn16=0,chain_acs1= oooooooo oxoooooo xooooooo oooooxox xoooooox ooxxoooo oxoooooo ooooooo,chain_acs2=,chain_acs3= oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooxoo oooooooo ooooooo,chain_acs4= oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo ooooooo,chain_acs5=,chain_acs6=,chain_acs7=,chain_acs8=,chain_acs9=,chain_acs10=,chain_acs11=,chain_acs12=,chain_acs13=,chain_acs14=,chain_acs15=,chain_acs16=,chain_hw1=41,chain_hw2=0,chain_hw3=111,chain_hw4=4,chain_hw5=0,chain_hw6=0,chain_hw7=0,chain_hw8=0,chain_hw9=0,chain_hw10=0,chain_hw11=0,chain_hw12=0,chain_hw13=0,chain_hw14=0,chain_hw15=0,chain_hw16=0,chain_rate1=,chain_rate2=,chain_rate3=,chain_rate4=,chain_rate5=,chain_rate6=,chain_rate7=,chain_rate8=,chain_rate9=,chain_rate10=,chain_rate11=,chain_rate12=,chain_rate13=,chain_rate14=,chain_rate15=,chain_rate16=|STATS=1,ID=POOL0,Elapsed=12350,Calls=0,Wait=0.000000,Max=0.000000,Min=99999999.000000,GHS 5s=0.00,GHS av=12036.77,Pool Calls=0,Pool Attempts=0,Pool Wait=0.000000,Pool Max=0.000000,Pool Min=99999999.000000,Pool Av=0.000000,Work Had Roll Time=false,Work Can Roll=false,Work Had Expire=false,Work Roll Time=0,Work Diff=121217.00000000,Min Diff=256.00000000,Max Diff=121217.00000000,Min Diff Count=18,Max Diff Count=7212,Times Sent=628,Bytes Sent=69481,Times Recv=1080,Bytes Recv=545065,Net Bytes Sent=69481,Net Bytes Recv=545065|STATS=2,ID=POOL1,Elapsed=12350,Calls=0,Wait=0.000000,Max=0.000000,Min=99999999.000000,GHS 5s=0.00,GHS av=12036.77,Pool Calls=0,Pool Attempts=0,Pool Wait=0.000000,Pool Max=0.000000,Pool Min=99999999.000000,Pool Av=0.000000,Work Had Roll Time=false,Work Can Roll=false,Work Had Expire=false,Work Roll Time=0,Work Diff=0.00000000,Min Diff=0.00000000,Max Diff=0.00000000,Min Diff Count=0,Max Diff Count=0,Times Sent=3,Bytes Sent=204,Times Recv=4,Bytes Recv=1414,Net Bytes Sent=204,Net Bytes Recv=1414|STATS=3,ID=POOL2,Elapsed=12350,Calls=0,Wait=0.000000,Max=0.000000,Min=99999999.000000,GHS 5s=0.00,GHS av=12036.75,Pool Calls=0,Pool Attempts=0,Pool Wait=0.000000,Pool Max=0.000000,Pool Min=99999999.000000,Pool Av=0.000000,Work Had Roll Time=false,Work Can Roll=false,Work Had Expire=false,Work Roll Time=0,Work Diff=4096.00000000,Min Diff=4096.00000000,Max Diff=4096.00000000,Min Diff Count=1,Max Diff Count=1,Times Sent=3,Bytes Sent=201,Times Recv=4,Bytes Recv=1502,Net Bytes Sent=201,Net Bytes Recv=1502|

[darval]

But to begin with, the intention of this Bounty is to make a complete open CGminer v. 4.9.2 according to the GPLv3 license.
That means that we are loyal to the work done by other community members and their hard work. First goal is to keep the miner GUI as is, but replace the BMMiner crap with CGminer 4.9.2, so if you can bring something to the table, please do !

i understand but the question is who will receive bounty?
for example: two ppl completed the task, what criteria would be used to select the winner?

Or the criteria in general to issue the bounty.  Can we agree on a clear list of criteria that when met, the bounty will be paid.  For example:

• Open source, meeting all GPL requirements.
• Directly part of the main trunk (like the older bitmain support)
• Easy install/remove scripts/instructions.

Feel free to add to the list (or remove items).  This list is my vote for what its worth.

[philipma1957]

But to begin with, the intention of this Bounty is to make a complete open CGminer v. 4.9.2 according to the GPLv3 license.
That means that we are loyal to the work done by other community members and their hard work. First goal is to keep the miner GUI as is, but replace the BMMiner crap with CGminer 4.9.2, so if you can bring something to the table, please do !

i understand but the question is who will receive bounty?
for example: two ppl completed the task, what criteria would be used to select the winner?

Or the criteria in general to issue the bounty.  Can we agree on a clear list of criteria that when met, the bounty will be paid.  For example:

• Open source, meeting all GPL requirements.
• Directly part of the main trunk (like the older bitmain support)
• Easy install/remove scripts/instructions.

Feel free to add to the list (or remove items).  This list is my vote for what its worth.

I  certainly want this to be a 'real'

open coded cgminer 4.9.2

Not a black box program with hidden codes.

We have collected 1.56btc as of now.

https://blockchain.info/address/16PP93e8tL1QuM7eoGNvLGtdfvHw5rAcd9

So this is not an earth shattering amount of coin.

 I am qualified to hold the coin and make sure it is either refunded or  paid out.

I can also run the new software on an s-9 on various pools.

But I can not say it is following rules of copyright so to speak.  We do have people here that can say it is a good cgminer 4.9.2

As for fubly  doing wrong in the past  I frankly don"t know if he did.  I also would not care if he was wrong last year if this code is not wrong.

I separate  a persons actions.  ie people can go from good to bad or bad to good.  along with staying all bad or staying  all good.

So if this work on this job is good it should be treated as such. A stand alone piece of work.

If this is bad work then so be it.

I will close with two examples:

  avalon did bad 3 years ago and hurt people in btc.  they have been pretty good since then I do business with them.

dz co-op  was good then bad and now is on the west coast (as an it data center)   I avoid them for now.

If qualified people tell me this is a closed hidden program  from fubly  I can't do the escrow.  I would offer to let those that put in  to pay or be refunded.

If kano and ck tell me this is bad like older work What am I left to do here?

The point of this was to have an approved  cgminer 4.9.2  not  a unapproved cgminer 4.9.2

[NotFuzzyWarm]

But to begin with, the intention of this Bounty is to make a complete open CGminer v. 4.9.2 according to the GPLv3 license.
That means that we are loyal to the work done by other community members and their hard work. First goal is to keep the miner GUI as is, but replace the BMMiner crap with CGminer 4.9.2, so if you can bring something to the table, please do !

i understand but the question is who will receive bounty?
for example: two ppl completed the task, what criteria would be used to select the winner?

Or the criteria in general to issue the bounty.  Can we agree on a clear list of criteria that when met, the bounty will be paid.  For example:

• Open source, meeting all GPL requirements.
• Directly part of the main trunk (like the older bitmain support)
• Easy install/remove scripts/instructions.

Feel free to add to the list (or remove items).  This list is my vote for what its worth.

I  certainly want this to be a 'real'
open coded cgminer 4.9.2

Not a black box program with hidden codes.
We have collected

Ja I agree that fubly's work on what is essentially a rehash of ASICboost on skimming through is sorta, 'Old news so why?".Those behind the marketing of it is... Well weird and again, 'Why?". However I get his point of being promised remuneration for the work on applying ASICboost to the s7. I assume the Players involved gave input to what they wanted to see and he did it. After that well...

Anywho, to me, what I mainly care about is that what parts of the source code of this work that by and large is built on CGminer be available on Github. In short, be able to verify just where the hash is going  when it is loaded on a clean and bare-bones as possible OS (no possibility of periodic point to shadow pools or other nefarious back door access). The public must be able to sort through the code being loaded. Now as to how this work communicates with the ASIC's... If the Driver remains closed source, well fine. Just provide the binaries needed for free be they for 'ux, MAC, or Win so possibly something other than Bitmains controller might be used to talk to the hash boards..

Am I right that pretty much as always the closed code so far is the driver interface between CGminer and the ASIC's? In a lot of the chip dev threads I've perused I recall that almost being a Constant sore spot.

[fubly]

Dear Community,

I have published at moment the full source code on github.
https://github.com/Zwilla/bmminer-master

At the folder "binaries", you will find this files and these are the MD5Sum's:

MD5-Sum                                            Binary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9001a9853e86acc67e40f09969abbf45   bmminer-api
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8230fdac00385e6196b27862ccc656ff    bmminer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
463d5d149f4c177db5a22655b2bc816d  restoreConfig.sh
-----------------------------------------------------------------

The upgrade script you find at the folder "update-script"

Note: run this script after review the code, make your changes or what ever you want.
Do not forget after changes to update the md5sum and run this script at first from your ssh shell for testing
before upgrading 100 Miners.

For those which want to build it from source, please read the build.md


If you only want to  test the binaries just login to your miners ssh console:

root@your_miner_ip

Username: root
Password: admin

enable ftp support by:

opkg install http://feeds.angstrom-distribution.org/feeds/v2013.06/ipk/eglibc/armv7ahf-vfp-neon/base/openssh-sftp-server_6.1p1-r3.4_armv7ahf-vfp-neon.ipk


login with

username: root
password: admin

transfer the file to the folder /usr/bin

do not forget to move the original files

mv /usr/bin/bmminer /usr/bin/bmminer-old
mv /usr/bin/bmminer-api /usr/bin/bmminer-api-old

restart your mining software by this way:

/etc/init.d/bmminer.sh restart

and
 
screen -r

to view what happened

To leave the screen session hold "CTRL" and type "a" and then "d"

[kano]

...
But I can not say it is following rules of copyright so to speak.  We do have people here that can say it is a good cgminer 4.9.2
...

So the fact that his git still violates the cgminer license means nothing to you I gather ...

I don't give a shit if he says he's poor and that he has to hide his code.
cgminer is opensource GPLv3 software
If you want to use it, you need to follow the GPLv3
Otherwise go write your own code from scratch

As for fubly  doing wrong in the past  I frankly don"t know if he did.

i.e. you couldn't be bothered finding out yourself and don't care that I've posted the details of it ...
He mined on kano.is and got really lucky for a short period of time finding blocks.
He then used that story of luck to try and scam people saying he was lucky due to implementing changes in cgminer and people should buy his firmware that was 'better' ... ... ...

His final stats on kano.is, however, show that his magic luck totalled less blocks than expected

Code:

CDF[Erl]
 0.758867 | fubly | 9.77543827 BDR | 8 B

So his BDR was 9.775 blocks but only found 8 blocks.
That's nothing unexpected, as the CDF[Erl] shows, but certainly to his advantage, not the pool's.
i.e. he found LESS blocks than expected, so his 'lucky' miners weren't 'lucky'

 avalon did bad 3 years ago and hurt people in btc.  they have been pretty good since then I do business with them.

Yeah but you missed out some things there ...
1) Yeah I have an entire thread on the subject between me and the git who was running things there and caused it (and I also made clear I didn't want to have or support the first avalon)
2) Much later (and a later miner version) the person I know at avalon offered me an avalon miner. My first question, was simply to ask if the git was still there, part of avalon any more. He said no. I said yeah ok that would be great then, I'd love to have an avalon
3) Bitmain offered me an S9. I said no I don't want it.

[philipma1957]

...
But I can not say it is following rules of copyright so to speak.  We do have people here that can say it is a good cgminer 4.9.2
...

So the fact that his git still violates the cgminer license means nothing to you I gather ...

I don't give a shit if he says he's poor and that he has to hide his code.
cgminer is opensource GPLv3 software
If you want to use it, you need to follow the GPLv3
Otherwise go write your own code from scratch

As for fubly  doing wrong in the past  I frankly don"t know if he did.

i.e. you couldn't be bothered finding out yourself and don't care that I've posted the details of it ...
He mined on kano.is and got really lucky for a short period of time finding blocks.
He then used that story of luck to try and scam people saying he was lucky due to implementing changes in cgminer and people should buy his firmware that was 'better' ... ... ...

His final stats on kano.is, however, show that his magic luck totalled less blocks than expected

Code:

CDF[Erl]
 0.758867 | fubly | 9.77543827 BDR | 8 B

So his BDR was 9.775 blocks but only found 8 blocks.
That's nothing unexpected, as the CDF[Erl] shows, but certainly to his advantage, not the pool's.
i.e. he found LESS blocks than expected, so his 'lucky' miners weren't 'lucky'

 avalon did bad 3 years ago and hurt people in btc.  they have been pretty good since then I do business with them.

Yeah but you missed out some things there ...
1) Yeah I have an entire thread on the subject between me and the git who was running things there and caused it (and I also made clear I didn't want to have or support the first avalon)
2) Much later (and a later miner version) the person I know at avalon offered me an avalon miner. My first question, was simply to ask if the git was still there, part of avalon any more. He said no. I said yeah ok that would be great then, I'd love to have an avalon
3) Bitmain offered me an S9. I said no I don't want it.

I have wrote in this thread one more then one post that I do not want to support a cgminer 4.9.2 that you do not above.
If you are taking the position that fubly needs to remove the ASICBoost

  corrected to : " ...So the fact that a git still violates the cgminer license means nothing to you I gather..."

...
But I can not say it is following rules of copyright so to speak.  We do have people here that can say it is a good cgminer 4.9.2
...

So the fact that his git still violates the cgminer license means nothing to you I gather ...

I don't give a shit if he says he's poor and that he has to hide his code.
cgminer is opensource GPLv3 software
If you want to use it, you need to follow the GPLv3
Otherwise go write your own code from scratch

As for fubly  doing wrong in the past  I frankly don"t know if he did.

i.e. you couldn't be bothered finding out yourself and don't care that I've posted the details of it ...
He mined on kano.is and got really lucky for a short period of time finding blocks.
He then used that story of luck to try and scam people saying he was lucky due to implementing changes in cgminer and people should buy his firmware that was 'better' ... ... ...

His final stats on kano.is, however, show that his magic luck totalled less blocks than expected

Code:

CDF[Erl]
 0.758867 | fubly | 9.77543827 BDR | 8 B

So his BDR was 9.775 blocks but only found 8 blocks.
That's nothing unexpected, as the CDF[Erl] shows, but certainly to his advantage, not the pool's.
i.e. he found LESS blocks than expected, so his 'lucky' miners weren't 'lucky'

 avalon did bad 3 years ago and hurt people in btc.  they have been pretty good since then I do business with them.

Yeah but you missed out some things there ...
1) Yeah I have an entire thread on the subject between me and the git who was running things there and caused it (and I also made clear I didn't want to have or support the first avalon)
2) Much later (and a later miner version) the person I know at avalon offered me an avalon miner. My first question, was simply to ask if the git was still there, part of avalon any more. He said no. I said yeah ok that would be great then, I'd love to have an avalon
3) Bitmain offered me an S9. I said no I don't want it.

 in order to get your approval here and fubly is taking the position he won't remove it I simply can't be the escrow for this  as my position that I won't distribute the prize to a non approved cgminer 4.9.2 won't work.

I collected 1.56 btc of which .01 was my tester for the new address.

We have four people that put in .25 btc and one person that put in .55 btc .




I am going to ask the five donators to take back their funds and have someone else be the escrow.


1) Xircom

Paid: 0.55 BTC to 16PP93e8tL1QuM7eoGNvLGtdfvHw5rAcd9

https://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/1a9fd9ac65a36a44802c06b11154250a4cd5bcd703393cd8d81af7ad5d09c2a1

2) citronick
Paid: 0.25 BTC to 16PP93e8tL1QuM7eoGNvLGtdfvHw5rAcd9

https://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/6755abe723748811d426d840f9ebb613a367a8f299efaa1819c24be11663f1ac

3)d57heinz
  
0.25 btc sent.
  https://blockchain.info/tx-index/f8e425b7896c862158de9d69219a72503e8d8a3d1cce094029004e64d12b9841
  
4) NotFuzzyWarm
 0.25btc donated to the above address for the Bounty escrow
https://blockchain.info/tx/3caef675ffe8276e9c5f7a5baca974cd9b18a9be9288bf9beecebcc9471dd010

5) darval
0.25
https://blockchain.info/tx/ab6662e1afdb29923f0a09ec03c5edb0f99e5961a232f340af96540111c1d399

please contact me  and I will refund to you.


My position is very simple if ck and kano tell me it is a no go  I am not escrowing.

and since kano states  the fubly's prior violation is active right now  and directly violates  the cgminer license  I can not distribute  funds to him.

Since it would not be the same as bad turning to good.  It would be a bad still existing . side by side with a good.

So the five above can do what they want with the coin they put in I will send it to them.

So :

Xircom----------- please give me a refund address   .55 due
citronick---------- please give me a refund address  .25 due
d57heinz--------- please give me a refund address  .25 due
NotFuzzyWarm---please give me a refund address  .25 due
darval ------------please give me a refund address  .25 due

make sure to post addresses here so I can show payment to them.



@ kano and ck  my intentions were to right a wrong not make  a new one.

it looks like fubly    is somewhat like Luke of bfgminer in a way.

So since I am not a code guy  and can not fully analyze the code I bow to your position that fubly is currently violating cgminer as I type.

[fubly]

Dear Kano,

I do not know what you want now?

Can you write it here:

01. Publish the source - done (since march 2016) - I was starting a pull request for the bitmain-S7 driver, but I never heard from you
02. ?
03. ?
04. ?
05. ?
06. ?
07. ?
08. Sh.. on fubly (send me a ticket and you can do it with live stream)
09. Using the word sh.. 10 x per line
10. ?

What is the different of a hole firmware and one program like TAR?

Hmm what is the different of MinToRRo and CGminer ? It is the same like above!


On MinToRRo I was developing some features and services OUTSIDE of cgminer, this features are controlling the fans.
For example a quick cooling function.
My own development! Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

Also developed feature for changing CGMINER.CONF for 1000's of miners within seconds (on your farm)
Can I sell this! Yes I can and I do, ohh before you mark now 1000's I mean millions, so mark millions!

Also I developed a perfect way for NEVER Rebooting your Miner.
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature for communicating over https with your miner.
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature for watching the hashrate and restart or reloading the miner software / hole hardware driver
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature for direct access to the hole cgminer.conf and change and set what ever the user want, and not what Bitmain want.
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I figured out how I can manipulate the Asic Board by using other timeouts so that death core suddenly starts working again.
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!
ps. that is that feature where you mean that I am a scammer (some posts above) Your problem on this case is, that you and I believe many other also
do not know how the driver controls the hardware driver .ko file.

I figured out how we can manipulate the voltage of the controller board over cgminer.conf
I developed a feature to shot it to the conf
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature to enable Autoworker / MAC or IP
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature for checking a PV-Generator - Solaredge to watch if there is enough power to start the miner!
https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/site/public?name=Zwilla#/dashboard
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

For this I developed a feature for switching the miner over Powerline - Power-Plug (AVM) on and off
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature for checking the BTC markets
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I paid 1BTC to cryptogance team to use their code (90% for css) than I was changing 99,98 % of the old code
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I figured out how it is possible if the hardware driver hangs and a restart won´t help to get the miner back without reboot.
I developed this feature!
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I figured out how to free memory on the miner, I developed this feature and build an automatic function which frees it every minute
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a feature to review every file on your config folder and download the block if you find one to review it
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

I developed a function which send you a email if this or this happens
Can I sell this? Yes I CAN and I do!

and so on.

I implemented cgminer 4.9.2 (download function) into MinToRRo-Firmware (user can choose: Using 4.8.0 one or 4.9.2)
Can I sell this function? Yes I CAN and I do!

One Point - Not publishing the source for cgminer 4.9.2 - yes that was not ok, now you know why I was not doing this.
But you post shows me that you are absolut pitiless.

All these features are implement into MinToRRo you can control as many machines you want.

Let me guess! You give a sh.. on this. I think you will never change your mind.

p.s. can you tell me how are tracking continuously my ip address and blocking my from kano pool.

Thats the reason why I cant show the stats on kano.is. But now you all have the code and test it by your self.