Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 07:27:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin, FinCEN and Shiny Objects...  (Read 1617 times)
Trader Steve (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 836
Merit: 1007


"How do you eat an elephant? One bit at a time..."


View Profile
March 23, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
 #1

Problem:

Exchanging “real” currency for “virtual” currency may subject you to regulatory requirements (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html).

Solution?

Consider this possible scenario:

BITCOIN WANTER: Will you sell me some bitcoin? I have cash!

BITCOIN OWNER: No, but I'll sell you my Shiny Object (wristwatch, medallion, pen) for your cash.

BITCOIN WANTER: Uh, okay. [transaction transpires]

BITCOIN OWNER: I'm starting to miss my Shiny Object...will you sell it back to me? I can pay you with bitcoin.

BITCOIN WANTER: Uh, okay. [transaction transpires].

1715282857
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715282857

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715282857
Reply with quote  #2

1715282857
Report to moderator
1715282857
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715282857

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715282857
Reply with quote  #2

1715282857
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715282857
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715282857

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715282857
Reply with quote  #2

1715282857
Report to moderator
1715282857
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715282857

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715282857
Reply with quote  #2

1715282857
Report to moderator
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 23, 2013, 06:43:33 PM
 #2

Lol!   Nice!

You don't happen to have a few of those watches do you?
bg002h
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1047


I outlived my lifetime membership:)


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2013, 07:00:48 PM
 #3

Yes...you have defined a commonly used scheme for laundering money. If someone hands you cash and asks you to drive it somewhere and drop it off, you are acting as a money transmitter...if the amount is small, you'll never be prosecuted.

Hardforks aren't that hard. It’s getting others to use them that's hard.
1GCDzqmX2Cf513E8NeThNHxiYEivU1Chhe
Meatpile
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 277
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 23, 2013, 07:04:35 PM
 #4

You didnt avoid anything, you owe tax on the first shiny for cash exchange.
Trader Steve (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 836
Merit: 1007


"How do you eat an elephant? One bit at a time..."


View Profile
March 23, 2013, 07:21:11 PM
 #5

The better way is to simply trade your gold and silver bullion for bitcoin. Or, just offer your goods and services in trade for bitcoin.

Bitco
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 746
Merit: 253



View Profile
March 23, 2013, 07:38:06 PM
 #6

It's not entirely clear what the origin of this 'guidance' is, but the issue appears to be 31 USC 5330 (d)(1)(B), which requires money transmitting businesses to register only if they are subject to section 5313, which involves reporting transactions in US currency exceeding $10000.

Trading bitcoins for a watch does not trigger the currency reporting requirement.  Selling the watch for more than $10000 in cash might.

There are probably other ways around this though.  The law only applies to a business, and not just a one-time sale of your personal property.  A money transmitter means moving money for other people, and not your own money.  Also, a check or wire transfer would not subject you to the currency reporting requirement (although your bank may have to report it).

It would be good to get some actual clarification from FinCEN on this though.  Their recent 'guidance' really doesn't clarify anything.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!