PascalCoin (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 03:03:50 PM |
|
I would immediately open a new Pascal pool if I would be familiar with unix and Ubunto better. It would make sure that the miner does not log on with an account, but with a public key. Payout automatically at 20-22 Pascal and an account would pass with the sum to the public key.
Start reading Wiki article: https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/wiki/Create-a-Pool-miner
|
PascalCoin is the first crypto currency without need of historical operations to control double spend and with ORDINAL account numbers. YES! LIKE A BANK!
|
|
|
BrunoS
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 03:26:02 PM |
|
I would immediately open a new Pascal pool if I would be familiar with unix and Ubunto better. It would make sure that the miner does not log on with an account, but with a public key. Payout automatically at 20-22 Pascal and an account would pass with the sum to the public key.
Start reading Wiki article: https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/wiki/Create-a-Pool-minerI've already looked at it all. Thanks again for your tips. But I can not make it. My skills are not enough. I would also pay for creating the pool. Or you can prepare something and install a fixed fee for developer and pool operators. I'm sure that would support many Pascal miners.
|
|
|
|
logictense
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 03:42:20 PM |
|
Depositing and withdrawal is temporarily disabled in polo,.. what happen to polo? anyone here have an idea?
Who cares? Pasc is an inappropriate instrument for long-shot plays, nobody needs to move it outta polo. Take advantage of a shot-term price action and buckle up for wild rally that is already in the works. Im scooping up cheap PASC like a mad guy, and setting the upper threshold for a rebound to 293K satos. PASC is like a rubber band but its dangerous in a sense that late peaks fall fast! So u have to think about ur exit price carefully.
|
|
|
|
kisk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 03:57:46 PM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
|
|
|
|
ratatatat
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 05:26:57 PM |
|
Lol, is this shit broken already? lulz
Not even worth for me doing all the numbers when it won't even survive long enough. NEXT!
|
|
|
|
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
aka ...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 05:58:53 PM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
... confirmed !
|
... please make an educated guess !
|
|
|
nu1mlock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 09:04:45 PM |
|
While it's possible to deposit to Poloniex now, I still haven't received two deposits from almost 48 hours ago. Three new ones after that has been credited to my account but two older are still missing.
Does anyone else have this issue?
|
|
|
|
wasref
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 09:36:36 PM |
|
Afternoon Pascal Investors I am selling a bunch of pascal accounts in total 680 pm me with offers for all of them or if you wish to buy single ones as well pm me. these 4 digit accounts ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi64.tinypic.com%2F2mee7tg.png&t=665&c=CKYjdoIKTG5Btw) i'd like to buy 10 account's 10 account number consecutive numbers like 1234,1235, 1236, 1237 etc. sent pm
|
|
|
|
Trololoh
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 11:37:42 PM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
Smells alot like the time warp exploit but whatever Nano is doing they show us that PaC has some serious issues that need to be fixed.
|
|
|
|
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
aka ...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 11:47:14 PM |
|
Smells alot like the time warp exploit but whatever Nano is doing they show us that PaC has some serious issues that need to be fixed.
kind speach 4 an ongoing issue @PascalCoin ! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
... please make an educated guess !
|
|
|
kisk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 01:59:04 AM |
|
While it's possible to deposit to Poloniex now, I still haven't received two deposits from almost 48 hours ago. Three new ones after that has been credited to my account but two older are still missing.
Does anyone else have this issue?
I am missing 21 deposits (~500 PASC) on Poloniex from 2017-02-23 01:46:42 to 13:25:53 CST. I created a ticket about 8hrs ago but have yet to receive a response. Very concerning.... now all my mining is going to my personal wallet until its fixed.
|
|
|
|
kisk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 02:01:36 AM |
|
Is it possible to run the daemon/wallet without it mining??
|
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 02:06:27 AM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
... confirmed ! I would like ocminer to chime in on this if there's a problem I'd hope he would be bring up this issue or maybe he hasn't caught it yet
|
|
|
|
nu1mlock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 02:06:32 AM |
|
I am missing 21 deposits (~500 PASC) on Poloniex from 2017-02-23 01:46:42 to 13:25:53 CST. I created a ticket about 8hrs ago but have yet to receive a response. Very concerning.... now all my mining is going to my personal wallet until its fixed.
Yeah, seems to be about the same-ish timeline for me. Though I'm only missing like 5 PASC, so I don't really care, but I still created a ticket as well. Not because I really want it back, but because of principle. But when it comes to you, then yes, you should definitely get it. It can't just "disappear", can it? When I asked in their "Trollbox", a mod claimed that it would "sync" when they re-enabled deposits. That hasn't happened yet, however. Hopefully it's just delayed, but you never know.
|
|
|
|
kisk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 04:52:14 AM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
... confirmed ! I would like ocminer to chime in on this if there's a problem I'd hope he would be bring up this issue or maybe he hasn't caught it yet ocminer knows what's going on.. nanopool has taken control of PASC for the moment but after all the hype their control will even out as more pools come in and the profit of the coin goes down.. EDIT: And pascal "bugs" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Leyur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 07:27:03 AM Last edit: February 25, 2017, 07:39:43 AM by Leyur |
|
Pasc is not a shit coin, but has lot's of shit bugs. Price will drop to 1000sat unless dev solve all the problems, plus give newbie at least one wallet account.
|
|
|
|
highflyerbtc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 07:51:29 AM |
|
Afternoon Pascal Investors I am selling a bunch of pascal accounts in total 680 pm me with offers for all of them or if you wish to buy single ones as well pm me. these 4 digit accounts http://i68.tinypic.com/2d2c4kg.pngCan i buy 3 accounts, is there a minimum order?
|
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 12:13:22 PM |
|
What's going on with PASC lately and the orphaned blocks on suprnova? I've been watching suprnova/nanopool closely and the past few days I'd say 75% of found blocks on suprnova are quickly orphaned and credited to nanopool. Sure, nanopool has a higher hash rate but watching closely it almost seems nanopool has found a way to take over suprnova's found blocks.
Just out of curiosity, if nanopool had control of enough nodes would it be possible for them to catch suprnova's found blocks, manipulate the block finder and spread it quickly to other nodes, which in turn would cancel out suprnova's find?
This is strange!!
... confirmed ! I would like ocminer to chime in on this if there's a problem I'd hope he would be bring up this issue or maybe he hasn't caught it yet ocminer knows what's going on.. nanopool has taken control of PASC for the moment but after all the hype their control will even out as more pools come in and the profit of the coin goes down.. EDIT: And pascal "bugs" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I asked both miningpoolhub and coinmine if they would think about opening a pool last week and got no response I would like to put together a community pool so we could distribute accounts to miners and investors I believe this is the only down fall of this coin ppl can't get their coins off the exchanges and it sucks to have to buy one
|
|
|
|
mankeen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 12:32:04 PM |
|
any best nano or suprnova ?
|
|
|
|
kuNnw0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 25, 2017, 12:39:20 PM |
|
any best nano or suprnova ?
suprnova is community preferred (nano exploits 51%)
|
|
|
|
|