PascalCoin (OP)
|
|
March 08, 2017, 02:34:28 PM |
|
I get banned for wrong time when I compile and run PascalCoin. No problems when I run the precompiled version downloaded from Sourceforge. I think ther is a bug in UTime.pas. There is a function: Function DateTime2UnivDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); // Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE} var The name says it should return Universal time from local time, but it calls a Lazarus/Fpc function that converts universal time to local time. It seems wrong. The call that is commented out seems to be the right one. But it looks like somebody perhaps has made a quick fix. There is also another function: Function UnivDateTime2LocalDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin // Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE} It should return local time from universal time but calls a system function that does the opposite I compile with Lazarus 1.6.4 and Fpc 3.0.2. My computers OS is Linux Mint ver. 18.1 Cheers Thanks, I'll test it on my linux servers (Ubuntu only) and I'll correct it or explain what is wrong... I don't understand why precompiled binaries are ok and if you build it yourself on Linux Mint then this not works... perhaps compiler on Mint issue?
|
PascalCoin is the first crypto currency without need of historical operations to control double spend and with ORDINAL account numbers. YES! LIKE A BANK!
|
|
|
nightraven
|
|
March 08, 2017, 04:44:56 PM |
|
Thanks, I'll test it on my linux servers (Ubuntu only) and I'll correct it or explain what is wrong...
I don't understand why precompiled binaries are ok and if you build it yourself on Linux Mint then this not works... perhaps compiler on Mint issue?
I also find it hard to understand. But if I do some wild guessing - really wild It looks like somebody has made a quick fix and commented out the original code and replaced the call to FCP/Lazarus. So my guess is, that earlier versions of Fpc or Lazarus perhaps had a bug. A bug that is fixed in the newest version of Fpc and Lazarus. It could be tested if someone still have earlier versions of Fpc and Lazarus.
|
|
|
|
botanik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2017, 04:00:23 AM |
|
No, I just want to know why if I have mined more than 50 pascals on Nanopool I have just received one account.
I receive an invoice every 40 - 45 pascal on Nanopool
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
|
March 09, 2017, 04:04:37 AM |
|
why the price is still so low? i only buy but seems others dump.
lets move this up ?
|
yolo
|
|
|
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
aka ...
|
|
March 09, 2017, 07:49:23 PM |
|
Block generation still do not look fair to me !
|
... please make an educated guess !
|
|
|
bitcoin42r4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2017, 09:55:51 AM |
|
Nice pump guys! Good job dev and good luck in future!
good jump is not possible even till we have to wait but slowly and steady .
|
|
|
|
michaelwang33
|
|
March 10, 2017, 05:38:35 PM |
|
updated accounts for sale
|
|
|
|
|
TripleHeXXX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 102
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz
|
|
March 11, 2017, 09:32:30 AM |
|
Something needs to be done about Poloniex encrypting payload ids, they're wasting insane amounts of our time for an unnecessary issue they're creating that is entirely outside of our control.
I've had to manually credit more than 20 PASC deposits from Poloniex with encrypted payload ids just today.
Users aren't willing to install the wallet themselves so they can ensure they deposit with the correct unencrypted payload id, and expect us to repeatedly manually intervene to credit their deposits from Poloniex that they KNOW wont be picked up by the deposit service because of their previous support tickets.
We can't justify continuing to spend so many of our already limited support hours on an issue another exchange is creating, so either Poloniex stops encrypting payload ids or Cryptopia delists PASC.
|
|
|
|
TripleHeXXX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 102
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz
|
|
March 11, 2017, 11:02:32 AM |
|
Dev has let us know there may be a way to work around the issue on our end, if we can remove the need to manually credit deposits with encrypted payload ids then there is no reason to delist PASC.
|
|
|
|
keylongjon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2017, 04:38:15 PM |
|
how to start mining pascalcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
jiggytom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 11, 2017, 07:58:06 PM |
|
|
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye LBC: bWYN8NXGKWsgEAd6tQnJ5YRo2Z4r6PjxBH
|
|
|
escapefrom3dom
|
|
March 11, 2017, 08:06:30 PM |
|
but allmost all blocks are created by nano. why is nano so popular if it is stealing from users?
|
|
|
|
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
aka ...
|
|
March 11, 2017, 08:06:54 PM |
|
... that´s not quit right, they have the hashrate they have, BUT THEY ARE STILL CHEATING THE BLOCKS OFF THE HONEST
|
... please make an educated guess !
|
|
|
cryptotrader111
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2017, 02:20:22 AM |
|
... that´s not quit right, they have the hashrate they have, BUT THEY ARE STILL CHEATING THE BLOCKS OFF THE HONEST PascalCoin's team have investigated reports of an exploit and after extensive analysis, have concluded there is no known exploit. The discrepancies found in Nanopool's block timestamps have been accounted for and were caused by worker's not rolling the timestamp during mining and no transactions on the network (thus work with new timestamp was not updated). This was not an exploit and not due to PascalCoin's daemon. It has since been resolved by issuing a miner notification every 30 seconds. Nanopool were not gaining any advantage with these timestamps. There is a bounty of 0.5 BTC to anyone who can document an exploit with current PoW consensus rules (details available in Slack).
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723
|
|
March 12, 2017, 08:14:55 AM |
|
Looks like a good trading is coming up for PASC. Great risk/reward
|
|
|
|
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
aka ...
|
|
March 12, 2017, 11:59:31 AM Last edit: March 13, 2017, 01:07:48 PM by PanneKopp |
|
PascalCoin's team have investigated reports of an exploit and after extensive analysis, have concluded there is no known exploit. The discrepancies found in Nanopool's block timestamps have been accounted for and were caused by worker's not rolling the timestamp during mining and no transactions on the network (thus work with new timestamp was not updated). This was not an exploit and not due to PascalCoin's daemon. It has since been resolved by issuing a miner notification every 30 seconds. Nanopool were not gaining any advantage with these timestamps.
There is a bounty of 0.5 BTC to anyone who can document an exploit with current PoW consensus rules (details available in Slack).
Thank you for the clearyfication. Looking @Polo the offloading seem 2 have started - do the maths. @PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas).
|
... please make an educated guess !
|
|
|
PascalCoin (OP)
|
|
March 13, 2017, 06:48:44 PM |
|
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas). Oops. Sorry. I didn't know that you were waiting for a response.
|
PascalCoin is the first crypto currency without need of historical operations to control double spend and with ORDINAL account numbers. YES! LIKE A BANK!
|
|
|
escapefrom3dom
|
|
March 13, 2017, 06:59:51 PM |
|
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas). Oops. Sorry. I didn't know that you were waiting for a response. great coin anyway. but why u made 5 (not 10 or 100) accounts per mined block?
|
|
|
|
|