Will Julian Assange be Assassinated by Hillary?

[RealityTruth]

Very interesting video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lbu1VXZIsI

Is the Wikileaks founder the next victim of the Clinton body count?
Seth Rich, one of the DNC leak sources was murdered, maybe they will kill Assange next. Any thoughts?

[1715087081]

1715087081

[1715087081]

1715087081

[1715087081]

1715087081

[1715087081]

1715087081

[ethereumhunter]

i really don't know but it maybe because julian assange is really too much about a secret especially about secret from government in many country. we already don't know how much the source that will give julian a news but what we all know that julian is keep more secret than we all know. so maybe julian assange is to precious for hillary and hillary would not killed julian and maybe will keep julian in under her control. but who knows?

[bryant.coleman]

The question is how she is going to assassinate him. Right now he is holed up in Ecuador's London embassy, and Hitlery has only two options to take out Assange.

1. Ask the US marines to invade the embassy, and capture Assange. The last time the Americans did something like this was in 1968, when they bombed the Soviet embassy in Washington DC.

2. Bribe someone from the Ecuadorian diplomatic mission and ask him to take out Assange. This is going to be Hitlery's best shot.

[Masha Sha]

What is sad about this case is that Sweden is now the highest rape per capita of Europe... And they want this dude like if he was a rapist. I am so sure that it's all fake of what they accused him. Meanwhile the real rapists are roaming the streets of Sweden were its full no go zone for anyone not immigrants. What are great socialist wonderland:D

[RealityTruth]

The question is how she is going to assassinate him. Right now he is holed up in Ecuador's London embassy, and Hitlery has only two options to take out Assange.

1. Ask the US marines to invade the embassy, and capture Assange. The last time the Americans did something like this was in 1968, when they bombed the Soviet embassy in Washington DC.

2. Bribe someone from the Ecuadorian diplomatic mission and ask him to take out Assange. This is going to be Hitlery's best shot.

I think they will use the second option because it's less messy.

U.N. Official 'Accidentally' Crushes Own Throat Right Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-02/un-official-accidentally-crushes-own-throat-right-testifying-against-hillary-clinton

[googie4]

It's a possibility. BUT, if he is assassinated then she will be considered to be responsible by a lot of people. So it would not be in her benefit. A Hillary rival might also assassinate him for the same reasons. So he should be very careful.

[googie4]

The question is how she is going to assassinate him. Right now he is holed up in Ecuador's London embassy, and Hitlery has only two options to take out Assange.

1. Ask the US marines to invade the embassy, and capture Assange. The last time the Americans did something like this was in 1968, when they bombed the Soviet embassy in Washington DC.

2. Bribe someone from the Ecuadorian diplomatic mission and ask him to take out Assange. This is going to be Hitlery's best shot.

If definitely won't be number one. It would be to obvious. These assassination are done in secret, made to look like an accident. Except for that last assassination which was done in a way to send a message.

[Tyrantt]

Very interesting video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lbu1VXZIsI

Is the Wikileaks founder the next victim of the Clinton body count?
Seth Rich, one of the DNC leak sources was murdered, maybe they will kill Assange next. Any thoughts?

I was "watching" that one yesterday (listening), and I was amazed how many people were that unlucky and imaginative.. I mean, dude commited a suicide by shooting himself in the back of his head.. lol? But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is stil lalive tho. Someone that's stirring up[ waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

[bryant.coleman]

But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is still alive tho. Someone that's stirring up waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

I am not surprised. It is not that easy to kill someone who is holed up inside the diplomatic mission of a foreign nation. And diplomatic staff tend to be fiercely patriotic, which makes them less vulnerable to bribes and kickbacks. The "intrusion" which happened a few days back was a desperate attempt by Hitlery to assassinate Assange. But even that proved to be a futile exercise.

[Masha Sha]

But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is still alive tho. Someone that's stirring up waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

I am not surprised. It is not that easy to kill someone who is holed up inside the diplomatic mission of a foreign nation. And diplomatic staff tend to be fiercely patriotic, which makes them less vulnerable to bribes and kickbacks. The "intrusion" which happened a few days back was a desperate attempt by Hitlery to assassinate Assange. But even that proved to be a futile exercise.

What is very telling about the safety of the U.K. In general is that with their overall cctv coverage they were (voluntary) unable to catch this assailant.

[Spendulus]

But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is still alive tho. Someone that's stirring up waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

I am not surprised. It is not that easy to kill someone who is holed up inside the diplomatic mission of a foreign nation. And diplomatic staff tend to be fiercely patriotic, which makes them less vulnerable to bribes and kickbacks. The "intrusion" which happened a few days back was a desperate attempt by Hitlery to assassinate Assange. But even that proved to be a futile exercise.

What is very telling about the safety of the U.K. In general is that with their overall cctv coverage they were (voluntary) unable to catch this assailant.

But killing him does not stop the leaks.  These guys not uncommonly set up a series of releases to occur UNLESS then provide notice not to release them.  This can be done a number of ways and is rather old technique.

[tvbcof]

But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is still alive tho. Someone that's stirring up waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

I am not surprised. It is not that easy to kill someone who is holed up inside the diplomatic mission of a foreign nation. And diplomatic staff tend to be fiercely patriotic, which makes them less vulnerable to bribes and kickbacks. The "intrusion" which happened a few days back was a desperate attempt by Hitlery to assassinate Assange. But even that proved to be a futile exercise.

What is very telling about the safety of the U.K. In general is that with their overall cctv coverage they were (voluntary) unable to catch this assailant.

But killing him does not stop the leaks.  These guys not uncommonly set up a series of releases to occur UNLESS then provide notice not to release them.  This can be done a number of ways and is rather old technique.

I guessed that the volume of material coming in to Wikileaks has gone up dramatically of late.  Assange mentioned this the other day and complained that the team was swamped.

In addition to the now dated 'insurance.aes256' file and it's follow-on which everyone has, a lot of other packages will probably float up into the ether should Assange depart from the living.

If I were Assange, I would make a series of base packages customized with unique auxiliary information.  The idea would be to create a post-Assange world where the original Wikileaks continues to chug along while a variety of newly born leak sites with few connections to the parent sprout up.  Those which find a foot-hold and tread carefully in an increasingly dangerous environment will continue on.  Many will fall of course, and that is the point of sowing many seeds.

[Spendulus]

But tbh I'm surprised that Assange is still alive tho. Someone that's stirring up waters that much is bound to have a fatal "accident".

I am not surprised. It is not that easy to kill someone who is holed up inside the diplomatic mission of a foreign nation. And diplomatic staff tend to be fiercely patriotic, which makes them less vulnerable to bribes and kickbacks. The "intrusion" which happened a few days back was a desperate attempt by Hitlery to assassinate Assange. But even that proved to be a futile exercise.

What is very telling about the safety of the U.K. In general is that with their overall cctv coverage they were (voluntary) unable to catch this assailant.

But killing him does not stop the leaks.  These guys not uncommonly set up a series of releases to occur UNLESS then provide notice not to release them.  This can be done a number of ways and is rather old technique.

I guessed that the volume of material coming in to Wikileaks has gone up dramatically of late.  Assange mentioned this the other day and complained that the team was swamped.

In addition to the now dated 'insurance.aes256' file and it's follow-on which everyone has, a lot of other packages will probably float up into the ether should Assange depart from the living.

If I were Assange, I would make a series of base packages customized with unique auxiliary information.  The idea would be to create a post-Assange world where the original Wikileaks continues to chug along while a variety of newly born leak sites with few connections to the parent sprout up.  Those which find a foot-hold and tread carefully in an increasingly dangerous environment will continue on.  Many will fall of course, and that is the point of sowing many seeds.

It's not possible to stop information flow on the internet.  Sure, sites can be "shut down."  But look at what that means.  Simply removing the link in the database by ICANN between the website name, and the actual website IP address.

The IP address remains, of course.  Then anyone publishing a list, searchable by Google, in the following format -

banned website name = xxx.yyy.zzz.aaa

and it would follow that Google would provide the link that ICANN no longer could.

It was interesting, the technique used by that strange creature "silk road," of jumping around on the tor network.

Many other techniques exist.  I suspect that the increased use of cloud storage in the future will eliminate "portals" of the sort that ICANN represents.  There's also of course, blockchain technology.

Of course, this means it's of strategic importance for governments to penetrate and control operations such as Google.

[BADecker]

Ecuador Admits Silenced Assange Because Clinton Leaks Were 'Interfering' w/ US Election

Julian Assange abruptly had his tether to the outside world purposely cut off Monday, when — as Wikileaks announced on Twitter — his "internet connection was intentionally severed by a state party."

Several hours later, Wikileaks added:

"We can confirm Ecuador cut off Assange's internet access Saturday, 5pm GMT, shortly after publication of Clinton's Goldman Sachs speeches."

Wikileaks is, of course, referring to the ongoing massive dump of documents heisted from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta's email account — proving Assange's intent to deliver transparency in his October Surprise in the remaining days before Americans vote in one of the most contentious presidential elections in U.S. history.

Speculation and accusation immediately ensued — in particular, theories positing the United States government had followed through on a ludicrous public vow to retaliate against Russia with a somehow covert cyber attack — either directly or through manipulation of officials in the Ecuadorian embassy-turned-asylum where Assange has resided for years.

Wikileaks then lent additional credence to that theory early Tuesday in a tweet, which read:

"BREAKING: Multiple US sources tell us John Kerry asked Ecuador to stop Assange from publishing Clinton docs during FARC peace negotiations."

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/ecuador-admits-silenced-assange/.

[BADecker]

If she could have done it, she would have already. Of course, this doesn't keep Assange's hair from going white with his worry about it.

[clickerz]

But killing him does not stop the leaks.  These guys not uncommonly set up a series of releases to occur UNLESS then provide notice not to release them.  This can be done a number of ways and is rather old technique.

Correct, and I think there are trusted people whom Assange give access to the files. But, Assange has inflict more damage to US and other world leaders. He is very critical to the system whom the elite build. Lets see, what will unfold after US election.

[Xester]

If ever that Mrs. Clinton wanted Julian to be dead, it will not be in the form of assasination.  Why?  Because if ever that this Julian would die of assasination or ambush then Hillary put herself in hot water.  All fingers will be pointed to her because everyone knows who will planned his assasination.  Maybe they would do something like cutting his car's break for more convincing vehicular accident.

[BitcoinReference]

i think Julian Assange not relation to hilary
but why Julian Assange only attack hilary, is trump not

[tvbcof]

i think Julian Assange not relation to hilary
but why Julian Assange only attack hilary, is trump not

One rather obvious possibility is that Wikileaks has little information on Trump, or little that is of particular importance.  In fact he called for some the other day as I recall.  Wikileaks is first and foremost a messenger and not a generator.

For my part, I think that it's pretty plausible that Wikileaks is awash with info on Hillary in part because so many people 'in the know' are so horrified by the thought of a Hillary Clinton presidency that they feel their hands forced to a degree.  Also it is now obvious that there is a wealth of material demonstrating her and her associates malfeasance because they are amazingly corrupt.  Information which is comparable in quantity or quality may simple not exist in the cast of Trump.

[tvbcof]

I've found the internet 'different' in some nebulous way that I cannot put my finger on over the last few days.  Lots of suspicious things about anything related to Assange and Wikileaks, and a few other sensitive subjects.  Old vids which are not labeled as such from new-ish actors and frustrating stuff like that.  Mainly just a lack of information.  Some say Assange has been captured or killed.  Whatever the case, the amount of information of any quality which is available does not seem to be nearly up to my expectations in terms of volume.

(BTW, this is what I, and seemingly I alone, would expect a so-called 'internet kill switch' to look like.  Much more subtle than most people probably envision.)

One interesting hypothesis that I've heard and credit some youtuber named montegraph for is this:  Basically, Wikileaks is 'under new management' and by elements of the U.S. intelligence apparatus.  The catch is that they are basically carrying on with business as usual because they don't want Hillary either!

Such a deal would suite both Assange and the proposed intel folks well.  The former might get his freedom and his life and his most important current project seen through to boot.  The latter might be able to avoid release of the dead-man's switch and get some technical assistance running the ship.

Ya, it's a pretty wild hypothesis but sometimes life is stranger than fiction so one never knows.  At least it's rare in real-time.

---

I think it was several years ago by now that I pointed out somewhere here on this board somewhere that the giant mass of data which the NSA (and others) are collecting has at least one possible upside to go along with it's immense dangers.  Only with access to such a thing would it be possible to do a thorough job of 'draining the swamp.'  Whether this happens or not probably comes down to the disposition of only a handful of people who we will probably never know of.  They truly swing the chute door between one of several completely different futures for the world.