Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 08:54:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mini Thermal Analysis of Avalon  (Read 1572 times)
Aseras (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:15:43 AM
 #1

I said I would do this when my units came in.

Here they are. This is what they look like sitting on my lab bench.
The fans are running. When everything is ok, it's blue. When something is wrong, its red.


You can notice that they are notched to allow stacking with each other. A very nice touch. Everyone should have more than one!

Thermal Imaging. All temperatures are Celsius.
It should be noted that I put the top back on after each image for a while to let the units try to be operated as briefly as possible with the cover removed so as not to skew the results.

Here's the same view in IR



Here's the top unit with the cover removed



The next two images are of the card next to the powersupply. The other two cards are hard to images because of how close they are.




Another view from the front with the top removed.


A closeup on the "Hot" part of the 3rd module


A view from the back side of the case looking in.


Here's the money shot. You can see the temperature gradient along the heatsink The front is cool, the back is warmer. The further from the intake the warmer the cards.
It's also worth noting that all 3 cards have similar temperatures. Even the 3rd card that's exposed it only slightly hotter in the bottom corner.
The 1st card wedged up by the powersupply is also cooled very well.


and lastly, just for fun

This is just a quick review. I'll go much more in depth later. I'm getting ready for some heavy travel shortly. At some point I'd like to do a full tear down and take some xray of the boards, when scheduling and equipment permits.

Thanks to team Avalon for the new toys!
1715331279
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715331279

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715331279
Reply with quote  #2

1715331279
Report to moderator
1715331279
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715331279

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715331279
Reply with quote  #2

1715331279
Report to moderator
1715331279
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715331279

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715331279
Reply with quote  #2

1715331279
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
miter_myles
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:20:09 AM
 #2

That's pretty cool!   Cool

BTC - 1D7g5395bs7idApTx1KTXrfDW7JUgzx6Z5
LTC - LVFukQnCWUimBxZuXKqTVKy1L2Jb8kZasL
farproc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


ALGORY.io Crowdsale starts on 8/12/2017


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:21:03 AM
 #3

Thanks a lot.

.
            ▀███████████████▄▄
              █████████████████
               █████████████████
                █████████████████
                 █████████████████
                  █████████████████
        ▄▄▄▄       █████████████████
    ▄██████████▄    █████████████████
   ██████████████    █████████████████
  ████████████████    █████████████████
 ██████████████████    █████████████████
 ██████████████████     █████████████████
 ██████████████████      █████████████████
  ████████████████        █████████████████
   ██████████████          █████████████████
    ▀██████████▀            ▀████████████████▄
       ▀▀▀▀▀▀ 
ALGORY  Multifunctional Tool for Cryptocurrency Trading 
Join Whitelist and Get 20% Bonus┃CROWDSALE ON DEC. 8
           ░████████████▒
       ░████████████████████░
     ░████████████████████████▒
   ░████████████████████████████░
  ░██████████████████   █████████▒
 ░███████████████      ▒██████████░
 █████████████         ████████████
░██████████            ████████████░
░██████                ████████████▒
░█████████████▒▒      ▒████████████▒
 ████████████████     █████████████░
 ▒████████████████    ████████████▒
  ▒████████████████▒  ████████████
   ░█████████████████ ██████████▒
     ██████████████████████████░
       ▒█████████████████████
          ░██████████████▒
Sitarow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:26:17 AM
 #4

Nice review, Looking forward to seeing the X-ray images.
cchan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:59:41 AM
 #5

really cool!
goxed
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006


Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:02:37 AM
 #6

hawt

Revewing Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2013, 03:09:06 AM
 #7

You're not using a thermal camera right if you've not taken it to the bathroom yet.

Priorities man, priorities.

Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:52:07 AM
 #8

Fascinating stuff.

I would change red is wrong, to red is hot!

58 C is high but could be just fine.  What matters is Tj the temperature at the transistor junction.  This needs to stay below the design temperature or you will have reliability problems in the long term.  I'm not sure what TSMC's Tj specification is for their 110 nm process, but it is probably around 75 C.

You can calculate Tj from what you have there with the thermal resistance Rjc and the power being dissapated in the device.  JC being junction to case.  It should be possible to look up an Rjc value for the heat sink used here.

Clearly there is some room for optimization though.
S M I L Y
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10

https://www.chynge.net/


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:59:58 AM
 #9

Very cool...  I mean Hot!

Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2013, 04:11:00 AM
 #10

Very helpful.  Thank You.

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
Wayne_Chang
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 05:48:31 AM
 #11

Interesting.
As graphic chip normally works under 80+ degrees, I think this level temperature is nothing to worry about.
uuidman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 12:55:05 PM
 #12

Nice pictures, this confirmes that the design with many small chips and a big passive heatsink was wise. But wouldnt a push-pull work even better ?
Now the positive preasure pushes warm air out of the box, some front fans working pushing air out, would suck in cold air through the holes in the box also ?
Aseras (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:22:51 PM
 #13

Fascinating stuff.

I would change red is wrong, to red is hot!

58 C is high but could be just fine.  What matters is Tj the temperature at the transistor junction.  This needs to stay below the design temperature or you will have reliability problems in the long term.  I'm not sure what TSMC's Tj specification is for their 110 nm process, but it is probably around 75 C.

You can calculate Tj from what you have there with the thermal resistance Rjc and the power being dissapated in the device.  JC being junction to case.  It should be possible to look up an Rjc value for the heat sink used here.

Clearly there is some room for optimization though.

red means something. Not really sure, lol. It may have been nice to get a manual and some technical documents ( hint Yifu and Dr Zhang ) when BFGminer flash bricked unit one it was red the whole time until i put it in recovery.
Aseras (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 02:24:00 PM
 #14

Nice pictures, this confirmes that the design with many small chips and a big passive heatsink was wise. But wouldnt a push-pull work even better ?
Now the positive preasure pushes warm air out of the box, some front fans working pushing air out, would suck in cold air through the holes in the box also ?

for the heatsink units yes, but Dr Zhang says this will cause the powersupply to overheat.

guess what i'm going to test soon?
Big Time Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 332
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 01, 2013, 02:17:23 AM
 #15

thanks for the pics -looks like they are well designed with very good heat distribution and dissipation.

Big time, I'm on my way I'm making it, big time, oh yes
- Peter Gabriel
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!