Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 08:32:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 465k Transaction...  (Read 1150 times)
nibor (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 291


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:43:46 PM
 #1

https://blockchain.info/tx/659135664894e50040830edb516a76f704fd2be409ecd8d1ea9916c002ab28a2

Surprised that did not cause a fork!
Is a good testcase - is it a new record sized transaction?
kokjo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000

You are WRONG!


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:48:22 PM
 #2

Surprised that did not cause a fork!
why?

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
Jocky
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2013, 03:54:24 PM
 #3

Are you sure you know what a fork is? A fork is the situation when two groups of miners start on the same blockchain, and make two separate ones. Big transactions are just a SoB to verify, I couldn't think of a reason it would cause a fork. But I may be wrong.

.
kokjo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000

You are WRONG!


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:01:51 PM
 #4

Are you sure you know what a fork is? A fork is the situation when two groups of miners start on the same blockchain, and make two separate ones. Big transactions are just a SoB to verify, I couldn't think of a reason it would cause a fork. But I may be wrong.
conclusion: OP is a fool.

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
MPOE-PR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 522



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
 #5

https://blockchain.info/tx/659135664894e50040830edb516a76f704fd2be409ecd8d1ea9916c002ab28a2

Surprised that did not cause a fork!
Is a good testcase - is it a new record sized transaction?

Sweet.

Quote
Fix the motherfucking code before you have to be fired. To recap : a. If I want to make 1 Mb txs I make 1 Mb txs ; b. correct inputs are selected to feed the outputs as if a human or better was doing the selecting.
~source

I guess that takes care of a. Nice going!

My Credentials  | THE BTC Stock Exchange | I have my very own anthology! | Use bitcointa.lk, it's like this one but better.
wtfvanity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


WTF???


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:19:13 PM
 #6

Code:
Total Input	                 10.73468425 BTC
Total Output                 7.23218425 BTC
Fees                                   3.5025 BTC
Estimated BTC Transacted 7.23218425 BTC

Holy crap... they have $1000 in coins, and they spend $300 to send $700... yikes.

          WTF!     Don't Click Here              
          .      .            .            .        .            .            .          .        .     .               .            .             .            .            .           .            .     .               .         .              .           .            .            .            .     .      .     .    .     .          .            .          .            .            .           .              .     .            .            .           .            .               .         .            .     .            .            .             .            .              .            .            .      .            .            .            .            .            .            .             .          .
Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 2301


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2013, 04:28:21 PM
 #7

Holy crap... they have $1000 in coins, and they spend $300 to send $700... yikes.

Transactions larger than 100K are non-standard now, so I doubt the big transaction was ever broadcast. Almost certainly the transaction belonged to the miner, and they paid the fees to themself.

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
wtfvanity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


WTF???


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:34:40 PM
 #8

Holy crap... they have $1000 in coins, and they spend $300 to send $700... yikes.

Transactions larger than 100K are non-standard now, so I doubt the big transaction was ever broadcast. Almost certainly the transaction belonged to the miner, and they paid the fees to themself.


Thanks, that's interesting to know.

          WTF!     Don't Click Here              
          .      .            .            .        .            .            .          .        .     .               .            .             .            .            .           .            .     .               .         .              .           .            .            .            .     .      .     .    .     .          .            .          .            .            .           .              .     .            .            .           .            .               .         .            .     .            .            .             .            .              .            .            .      .            .            .            .            .            .            .             .          .
Peter Todd
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1160


View Profile
April 01, 2013, 03:15:04 PM
 #9

Holy crap... they have $1000 in coins, and they spend $300 to send $700... yikes.

Transactions larger than 100K are non-standard now, so I doubt the big transaction was ever broadcast. Almost certainly the transaction belonged to the miner, and they paid the fees to themself.


There are enough old nodes still running on the network to get 100k txs propagated to miners if you start with a well connected node.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!