BOTDICE online simulator - play 100k Just-Dice / Satoshidice rounds for free

[GCInc.]

We have released a test version of BotDice.

UPDATE 2013-07-18: Just-Dice.com simulation added!

Simulate thousands of Just-Dice / Satoshidice rounds with automatic progression and see how much you would win or lose with your betting strategy.

From the simple options menu you can customize your bet progression extensively. Simulation lengths available are 100 or 1000 bets, just once or 100 sessions in a row. Current options include the following:

Max rounds to play    
Initial bankroll (cash)    
Target profit %   
Game type
Payout multiplier on win
Payout multiplier on loss
   
Initial bet amount    
Adjust bet after win    
Adjust bet after loss   
Reset to initial bet after wins in a row
Reset to initial bet after losses in a row
Maximum single bet
Transaction fee per bet   
Single session (show all bets) or big data (100 sessions just results)

Try it out and see the statistical value of your strategy before risking your monies and wasting time on the Just-Dice / Satoshidice site in an attempt to find out the best strategy! It's also eye opening to notice how large effect the nasty transaction fees or their absence have on your final profit.

Special thanks to mem for the inspiration arising from his memtingale simulator giving the igniting spark for this project!

Project will be updated more or less regularly. It's still very early alpha. Please report any errors or requests to this thread.

[mc_lovin]

Fantastic!

But when I change the game type, the multipliers don't change? 

[GCInc.]

But when I change the game type, the multipliers don't change? 

Right, that's unfortunately still work in progress.. due to be updated when I can find 30 minutes extra for the frustrating stint

[Grover]

Cool idea but I'm pretty sure the bets are not working correctly or I'm not understanding how to input correctly.

ex. I do a run

bet 1 loss bet .01
bet 2 win bet .01

Maybe it's just me but the second bet should have been at least .02.

It's like the bets for win/loss is placed after the win/loss is determined, because I then will have a string of losses where my bet increases, or same on wins.


added

I'm pretty sure that instead of resets based on number of bets it needs to be conditional on win after loss. Then max increase amount is based on balance of bank or amount of bank at risk for the game.

The increase during wins is a nice feature, but at times when there is a loss the bet decreases on the first loss???


added

bet progression issue.

#    lucky number    bet    win    Profit
0    21280    0.010    0.0190700    0.0090700

1    47454    0.020    -0.0204900    -0.0114200
2    63734    0.040    -0.0404800    -0.0519000
3    62849    0.060    -0.0604700    -0.1123700

4    19732    0.080    0.1560600       -0.0363100
5    21103    0.090    0.1756300        0.0493200
6    00138    0.100    0.1952000      0.1445200

7    48626    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1340250
8    32777    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1235300
9    44185    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1130350
10    64938    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1025400
11    57191    0.010    -0.0104950    0.0920450
12    55645    0.010    -0.0104950    0.0815500
13    57211    0.010    -0.0104950    0.0710550

14    18680    0.010    0.0190700      0.0801250

15    47337    0.020    -0.0204900    0.0596350
16    44899    0.040    -0.0404800    0.0191550
17    52247    0.060    -0.0604700    -0.0413150
18    60597    0.080    -0.0804600    -0.1217750

19    12904    0.100    0.1952000      -0.0265750
20    11133    0.110    0.2147700       0.0781950
21    19271    0.120    0.2343400       0.1925350

22    36121    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1820400
23    34679    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1715450
24    48329    0.010    -0.0104950    0.1610500

[GCInc.]

Maybe it's just me but the second bet should have been at least .02.

On what progression plan? Please detail the settings you use for us to be able to spot the errors. There may be issues at this stage.

The increase during wins is a nice feature, but at times when there is a loss the bet decreases on the first loss???

Yes, if you go with the default settings the bet is decreased after a loss occurs (-0.01).

[Grover]

Greatness you used 65536 numbers for the random number.  I was going to add that to mem's.


It seems like the variable(s) for the bets is getting overwritten/reset in a conditional in the loop.


21:47:00
Max rounds to play:      100
Initial bankroll (cash):   10
Target cash:         cash +50%
Game type:         32768
Win multiplier:         1.957
Start bet:         0.01
Adjustment after win:   0.0
Adjustment after loss:   0.022

#    lucky number    bet    win    Profit

0    64906    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0104950
1    59444    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0209900

2    8514    0.010    0.0190700    -0.0119200
3    5710    0.010    0.0190700    -0.0028500

4    65254    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0133450
5    50497    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0238400

6    23879    0.010    0.0190700    -0.0147700
7    8256    0.010    0.0190700    -0.0057000
8    21565    0.010    0.0190700    0.0033700
9    12388    0.010    0.0190700    0.0124400

10    35310    0.010    -0.0104950    0.0019450
11    43254    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0085500
12    57363    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0190450
13    43450    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0295400

14    15149    0.010    0.0190700    -0.0204700

15    64072    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0309650
16    43447    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0414600
17    34175    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0519550
18    51739    0.010    -0.0104950    -0.0624500



--------------------------------------

21:49:03
Max rounds to play:      100
Initial bankroll (cash):   10
Target cash:         cash +50%
Game type:         32768
Win multiplier:         1.957
Start bet:         0.01
Adjustment after win:   0.006
Adjustment after loss:   0.028


#    lucky number    bet    win    Profit
0    31475    0.010    0.0190700    0.0090700

1    37085    0.016    -0.0164920    -0.0074220
2    26712    0.044    0.0856080    0.0341860
3    48105    0.050    -0.0504750    -0.0162890
4    52380    0.078    -0.0784610    -0.0947500

5    2522    0.106    0.2069420    0.0061920

6    58901    0.112    -0.1124440    -0.1062520

7    9724    0.140    0.2734800    0.0272280
8    9565    0.146    0.2852220    0.1664500
9    49525    0.152    -0.1524240    0.0140260
10    60013    0.180    -0.1804100    -0.1663840
11    57090    0.208    -0.2083960    -0.3747800
12    57804    0.236    -0.2363820    -0.6111620
13    46878    0.264    -0.2643680    -0.8755300
14    56916    0.292    -0.2923540    -1.1678840

15    28316    0.320    0.6257400    -0.8621440
16    24838    0.326    0.6374820    -0.5506620
17    30130    0.332    0.6492240    -0.2334380
18    4186    0.338    0.6609660    0.0895280
19    2321    0.344    0.6727080    0.4182360

20    49428    0.350    -0.3503250    0.0679110
21    38101    0.378    -0.3783110    -0.3104000

[GCInc.]

I am unable to reproduce the first series given your settings. Are you sure you didn't use max bet 0.01 or such (not every setting is displayed in the result page)?

Could you point out the error in the second sequence you quoted?

[Grover]

I am unable to reproduce the first series given your settings. Are you sure you didn't use max bet 0.01 or such (not every setting is displayed in the result page)?

Could you point out the error in the second sequence you quoted?

I change the loss setting to positive.  Neg/subtracting from the previous bet after a loss is not how I play the system.  I've never seen that system before.  Seems to me subtracting causes you to put funds at risk with the goal of getting a smaller return so then when a win is reached the payoff does not cover the total of all the previous losses.

What is the purpose of subtracting after a loss?

example. (I just picked numbers to increase that were about 2.5x+ greater than the previous loss.  I add .006 on wins in this example for no reason.)

bet   amt    w/l
1      .01     w
2      .016   w
3      .022     l
4      .05       l
5      .13       l
6      .3        l
7      .8        w
8      .01      w
9      .016    l
10    .04      w
11    .01      w
etc...

[GCInc.]

What is the purpose of subtracting after a loss?

Anything. The negative figure in the default setup is there to have readily an example of substraction.

Personally I have found the reverse progression work nicely on some game types and settings, because it catches winning streaks and decreases losses on losing streaks.

[Grover]

What is the purpose of subtracting after a loss?

Anything. The negative figure in the default setup is there to have readily an example of substraction.

Personally I have found the reverse progression work nicely on some game types and settings, because it catches winning streaks and decreases losses on losing streaks.

I see.  But you can't predict wins or losses.  Wins are safe zones.  With memtingale a loss means the next bet is 2.n times greater than the first lost bet.  This is to recoup more than the first loss times the win multiplier if you assume the loss was a win.

Here's the output sample from Not@Las' pure martingale bot (copied from here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80245.0)

The bets are increased 2x during a losing round then reset to the original 0.01 bet after the first win after a loss.  memtingale's system is Martingale but instead of a 2x multiplier you use a 2.n x multiplier to increase payout for a win.

Mem's sim follows the same rules as the bot.

Code:

Game #1
Balance: 11.37567619       Bet: 0.01       Fee: 0.0005       Total Fees: 0.0005
Balance: 11.36517619       Waiting...
Balance: 11.36521708       Lose!

Game #2
Balance: 11.36521708       Bet: 0.02       Fee: 0.0005       Total Fees: 0.001
Balance: 11.34471708       Waiting.........
Balance: 11.34479886       Lose!

Game #3
Balance: 11.34479886       Bet: 0.04       Fee: 0.0005       Total Fees: 0.0015
Balance: 11.30429886       Waiting...
Balance: 11.38554886       Win! (1 out of 3)

Game #4
Balance: 11.38554886       Bet: 0.01       Fee: 0.0005       Total Fees: 0.002
Balance: 11.37504886       Waiting.....
Balance: 11.37508975       Lose!

[GCInc.]

I know how Martingale progression works. I do not find it superior to progression systems with static increase and decrease. Currently Botdice allows much wider customization of bets than doubling up on loss. Buy don't worry, the  basic progression scheme of multiplying your previous bet will be added soon as well, so you can compare yourself how  massive losses you'll get on average of 100.000 bets or even a single run of 1000 bets.

[Grover]

I know how Martingale progression works. I do not find it superior to progression systems with static increase and decrease. Currently Botdice allows much wider customization of bets than doubling up on loss. Buy don't worry, the  basic progression scheme of multiplying your previous bet will be added soon as well, so you can compare yourself how  massive losses you'll get on average of 100.000 bets or even a single run of 1000 bets.

It's a great app.

What settings do you use for best results?

added

And apologies for me not getting it.  Day off, I was in a different mind.

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE updated to v0.55a

- fixed max and min bet limits
- fixed round number to start from 1
- added multiplication progression adjustments (making Martingale possible)
- added script benchmark

It's a great app.

What settings do you use for best results?

Thanks, I hope you like it now even more  .

Discussing the settings you can spend half of you life... but generally, I have an impression that settings increasing the bets towards the end of session rather than adjusting them down yield more. Someone proficient in math could chime in to evaluate whether that can combat the negative estimated value somewhat in a limited session.

Also, I prefer catching winning streaks by increasing bets on a 50%+ odds game type, but I'm not sure to what extent this affects the total profit with what limitations.

Naturally, with the house edge and fees taken into account, you'll fare best with the smallest number of bets and largest stakes. But it's rather interesting to run tests without house edge and fees.

[Grover]

BOTDICE updated to v0.55a

- fixed max and min bet limits
- fixed round number to start from 1
- added multiplication progression adjustments (making Martingale possible)
- added script benchmark

It's a great app.

What settings do you use for best results?

Thanks, I hope you like it now even more  .

Discussing the settings you can spend half of you life... but generally, I have an impression that settings increasing the bets towards the end of session rather than adjusting them down yield more. Someone proficient in math could chime in to evaluate whether that can combat the negative estimated value somewhat in a limited session.

Also, I prefer catching winning streaks by increasing bets on a 50%+ odds game type, but I'm not sure to what extent this affects the total profit with what limitations.

Naturally, with the house edge and fees taken into account, you'll fare best with the smallest number of bets and largest stakes. But it's rather interesting to run tests without house edge and fees.

Yes, the changes are great.

[Grover]

Seems to be some issues with win and profit calculations in determining when a game is complete.

I understand how you determined the win amount.

If there is a note that the txfee is subtracted from the win before the win is printed to the screen, my bad for not seeing that information.  

Suggestion:
Technically in accounting for the win and the profit; the win is the return from SD and the profit is where the txfee is subtracted.
For example when a bet is won on SD 50/50 the payout is 1.957.  This is "gross profit" or the win.  
I bet 1.0 on 50/50 and win; my client will show a return of 1.957
Then profit "net profit" is where the fee is subtracted from the win.

I think this approach would also build faith in your site since people would see the exact same amounts in the client and on your site. (assuming they are always charged a fee of 0.00005 0.0005. Sometimes I'm charged a gee fee of 0.0001 0.001)

I included a round where there seems to be an issue with calculating final profit for the win multiplier, but I may be missing something.

(the code box gives better columns than quote)

Code:

x x

03:29:08
Max rounds to play:		100
Initial bankroll (cash):	10
Target cash:			cash +50%
Game type:			32768
Win multiplier:			1.957
Start bet:			0.01
Max bet: 			3.7
Transaction fee:		0.0005 per bet
Adjustment after win:		1.33x
Adjustment after loss:		1.33x
Reset bet size after 2 wins
Reset bet size after 2 losses

Session 1 (x 100 bets) **Session profit: 5.1445109 **High point: 1.6041109 **Low point: -0.1149065 **FINAL CASH: 15.1445 BTC
Winning sessions: 1/1 TOTAL PROFIT: 5.1445 BTC
Script Benchmark: 0.00184512138366699


# 	lucky number 	bet 	win 	Profit
1 	61829 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0104995
(for round 1, shouldn't profit should be -0.01045? (-0.01bet + -0.0005txfee + 0.00005return)
since this appears to scale the 0.0000495 difference can start to add up. 
ie. if the [s][s]best[/s][/s] bet was 1.0 the difference is x100 for 0.00495 which present value in USD is $0.4554 or ~$22.77 for 50 losing 1btc bets.)

2 	64331 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0339984
3 	30767 	0.010 	0.0190700 	-0.0249284
4 	59717 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0484273
5 	41464 	0.054 	-0.0544973 	-0.1029246
6 	49247 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.1134241
7 	20672 	0.010 	0.0190700 	-0.1043541
8 	1388 	0.023 	0.0445110 	-0.0828431
9 	41113 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0933426
10 	10538 	0.023 	0.0445110 	-0.0718316
11 	23810 	0.054 	0.1051780 	-0.0206536
12 	60525 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0311531
13 	35887 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0546520
14 	52915 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0651515
15 	139 	0.010 	0.0190700 	-0.0560815
16 	16602 	0.023 	0.0445110 	-0.0345705
17 	54275 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0450700
18 	42251 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0685689
19 	63521 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	-0.0790684
20 	13108 	0.010 	0.0190700 	-0.0699984
21 	62780 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0934973
22 	711 	0.054 	0.1051780 	-0.0423193
23 	3546 	0.126 	0.2460820 	0.0777627
24 	62524 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	0.0672632
25 	42471 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	0.0437643
26 	18189 	0.010 	0.0190700 	0.0528343
27 	35331 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	0.0293354
28 	39488 	0.054 	-0.0544973 	-0.0251619
29 	28745 	0.010 	0.0190700 	-0.0160919
30 	55346 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	-0.0395908
31 	24864 	0.054 	0.1051780 	0.0115872
32 	55682 	0.126 	-0.1264937 	-0.1149065
33 	25389 	0.294 	0.5748580 	0.1659515
34 	540 	0.685 	1.3400450 	0.8209965
35 	41261 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	0.8104970
36 	14174 	0.023 	0.0445110 	0.8320080
37 	49108 	0.054 	-0.0544973 	0.7775107
38 	33487 	0.126 	-0.1264937 	0.6510170
39 	58588 	0.010 	-0.0104995 	0.6405175
40 	3893 	0.010 	0.0190700 	0.6495875
41 	33188 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	0.6260886
42 	64000 	0.054 	-0.0544973 	0.5715913
43 	2316 	0.010 	0.0190700 	0.5806613
44 	46643 	0.023 	-0.0234989 	0.5571624
45 	24436 	0.054 	0.1051780 	0.6083404
46 	40310 	0.126 	-0.1264937 	0.4818467
47 	11081 	0.294 	0.5748580 	0.7627047
48 	51581 	0.685 	-0.6854657 	0.0772389
49 	28769 	1.596 	3.1228720 	1.6041109 // profit does not equal the listed TOTAL PROFIT: 5.1445 BTC
WIN TARGET +50% ACHIEVED!

[bitfreak!]

I haven't really played SD before and I'm not certain exactly how it works. At first I was losing basically every single time with your simulator, then I changed the settings and now I'm reaching a win target of +50% every single time. That can't be right can it?

[GCInc.]

Seems to be some issues with win and profit calculations in determining when a game is complete.

This was just because the last bet was not printed before the completion announcement - it's being fixed in the next version that's being uploaded soon.

If there is a note that the txfee is subtracted from the win before the win is printed to the screen, my bad for not seeing that information.

No note, the win column listed net winnings.

I bet 1.0 on 50/50 and win; my client will show a return of 1.957
Then profit "net profit" is where the fee is subtracted from the win.

I think this approach would also build faith in your site since people would see the exact same amounts in the client and on your site. (assuming they are always charged a fee of 0.00005. Sometimes I'm charged a gee of 0.0001)

Your suggestion is appreciated. The amounts need to be the same as displayed on the client.

#    lucky number    bet    win    Profit
1    61829    0.010    -0.0104995    -0.0104995
(for round 1, shouldn't profit should be -0.01045? (-0.01bet + -0.0005txfee + 0.00005return)
since this appears to scale the 0.0000495 difference can start to add up.

I think we both are confusing the number of zeros here. The loss return rate is 0.005 times your bet, which affects returns extensively for small bet amounts. This has been fixed for the default menu.

[From private message]

Also it appears possible to bet more than is in the bank

The "bank" is misleading, it should be "cash per session". Big data mode works by separating sessions, so the possible loss of more cash than initial bank per session is by design.

Last, I think SD uses 0 to 65535 inclusive.

That's true. It's correct in the software, but will fix for the description as well.

There seems to be some inconsistency on what fees Satoshidice deducts from winning payments. On their site they state: "On a win or a lose a transaction fee of 0.0005 is subtracted from the payment amount." However, we received back exactly 1.957000x our winning bet upon test, without fees substracted.

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE update

2013-04-01   v0.56a
    
- fixed last bet display error
- fixed default lose multiplier
- adjusted bet and win amounts to be uniform with real wallet results

Next to do:
- automatic multipliers for game types
- limit last bet of session to not exceed bankroll

At first I was losing basically every single time with your simulator, then I changed the settings and now I'm reaching a win target of +50% every single time. That can't be right can it?

It depends on what you mean "every single time". With target profit of 50% and less it is not uncommon to reach target 10 times in a row. You are expected to reach 50% profit more often than not, unless you use exceedingly bad strategies.

Use the big data mode to review a strategy you have found good from the single session analysis. If you still end up in profit after 100 sessions of 1000 rounds, you are set to be very wealthy

In such a case, a more likely possibility is that there are errors in the software. That's why it's still in alpha phase and all user reports are welcome.

[EDIT: you can easily end up in profit in the big data mode as well. However multiple big data runs should yield clearly negative total result (because your big data losses can end up very large, even if you win more runs than lose).]

[Grover]

I bet 1.0 on 50/50 and win; my client will show a return of 1.957
Then profit "net profit" is where the fee is subtracted from the win.

I think this approach would also build faith in your site since people would see the exact same amounts in the client and on your site. (assuming they are always charged a fee of 0.00005. Sometimes I'm charged a gee fee of 0.0001)
I did mistakenly add an extra 0 in each of the above statements.  

Your suggestion is appreciated. The amounts need to be the same as displayed on the client.

And for some shameless self promotion I sent you a small donation for the site. I've tried many more different variations on betting that I've been meaning to test but never have.  Thanks!

[GCInc.]

Thanks for the donation! Every bitcent helps in keeping up the motivation

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE update April 4th 2013:

v0.57a
     - limited bets to always be within session bankroll near cash expiration
     - adjusted colors for readability

Testers welcome!

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE awaited update:

v0.58a
    - automatic payout multipliers for Satoshidice game type selection!

It was a surprise that this feature opens up a whole new world of usability when you don't have to type in the multiplier. I hope you're enjoying it as much as I am 

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE awaited update:

v0.58a
    - automatic payout multipliers for Satoshidice game type selection!

It was a surprise that this feature opens up a whole new world of usability when you don't have to type in the multiplier. I hope you're enjoying it as much as I am 

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE awaited update:

v0.58a
    - automatic payout multipliers for Satoshidice game type selection!

It was a surprise that this feature opens up a whole new world of usability when you don't have to type in the multiplier. I hope you're enjoying it as much as I am 

[frozen]

The first time the page is loaded, the Game Type selected is 60000. The payout multiplier on win is 1.957. If I select a different Game Type, and then re-select 60000, the payout multiplier changes to 1.004. Why is the initial payout multiplier different?

[GCInc.]

The first time the page is loaded, the Game Type selected is 60000. The payout multiplier on win is 1.957. If I select a different Game Type, and then re-select 60000, the payout multiplier changes to 1.004. Why is the initial payout multiplier different?

There was a bug affecting the automatic payout multipliers. It should now show the correct multipliers from the beginning.

[Dabs]

After playing 1000 sessions of 1000 bigdata games, with all sorts of numbers typed in, you will eventually lose everything.

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE update v0.59a

Bitbattle.me multipliers added.

[Financisto]

Nice bot.

Very well done.

Congratulations!

[GCInc.]

BOTDICE update v0.60

- Just-Dice.com simulation added
- Total profit fixed for big data

Very well done.

Thank you!

[itod]

Hi,

Thanks for the bot, very useful.

There seems to be only one problem: Initial bet amount can't go lower than 0.00001, which would be so useful for some simulations. It's not only the problem it can not fit visually in the table, calculations seem to be completely screwed of by this, although I can not be sure since can not see the results in single session. Is there any chance we can get 0.00000001 as minimal amount? BTW, is this opensource?