Hello dev, sent pm, kindly read.. thanks
CryptopiaYesterday I submitted a request for a coin review for Cryptopia, within 24 hours they have responded with the following comments (without making any effort to make contact or ask any questions) yet they have listed some of the worst coins in history on their exchange and still do;
excessive premine, no viewable source, failed coinswap
So in response to Cryptopia, who I have operational concerns (they are absolute liars) about the way they have received this coin.
1) Excessive premine
50% is not an excessive premine, it is a safeguard against a 51% attack against amateur governance and long term sustainability
What is the issue?
2) No viewable source
The source files plus wallets can be downloaded and viewed by any client from
https://github.com/Golfcoin/2.0 What is the issue?
3) Failed coinswap
It was announced that coins from V1.0 will be reimbursed ongoing (not closing) until all v1.0 wallets have been reimbursed from the chain, evidence would then be provided of this. How can this have failed.
What is the issue?
Given they have made the following comments about Bitcoin21 (
which is still ongoing and actually I can prove I have had previous communication with both the UK Government and HM Treasury) "scamn, excessive premine, fraudulent, ridiculous and misleading claims by its dev - relationships to UK government/treasury, charities, "airdrops" " which they have lied about plus they have refused to list XP.
The following complaint has been sent to Cryptopia today
"On your review of Bitcoin 21 you have written - scamn, excessive premine, fraudulent, ridiculous and misleading claims by its dev - relationships to UK government/treasury, charities, "airdrops" -
Your comments are without evidence or foundation. You will also notice that the premine has not moved since inception despite listing on Yobit. I can also prove that I have had prior communication with the government office of the previous prime minister and communication with HM treasury.
There are no misleading claims, the timeline has simply extended. The only scam would seem to be the false operation of a fair exchange which is still subject to fair trading.
So you have refused to list 3 coins - Bitcoin 21, XP and Golfcoin - which have signfiicant potential, however your exchange continues to list awful coins on the basis that it will make you money despite they are largely unsupported or have devs that have disappeared.
I would ask that you reply in depth explaining your comments, and reasons clearly for refusing to accept these coins on your exchange. Failure to do so will result in a report to the office of fair trading in the UK with the allegations you are running a fraudulent and dishonest business.
I trust you understand the seriousness of this complaint and would ask you respond within 7 days with full information. If you have any questions rather than make any allegations of a scam, it would be preferable if you would make contact to discuss further.
I am very disappointed with your service and attitude. This will be posted in the Bitcointalk forum as evidence of communication today on 7th September 2016.
I look forward to hearing from you in the immediate future
Sincererly
Bitcoin 21, Golfcoin and XP developer."We reserve the right to choose which coins we do and do not provide services for, for any reason.
This is an interesting approach to trying to bring us onside.
We will not be listing these coins, the official reason for this is now: Because fuck you, that's why.
We wish you the best of luck with your complaint to the UK OFT.
