Best Campaign Manager in BCT Forum

[BitHodler]

I have been in three signature campaigns so far.

First campaign was from themerkle managed by themerkle.

Second campaign was from HEAT ledger managed by Lutpin.

Third campaign is from ICONOMI managed by yahoo62278.

So far each of the managers have done an outstanding job on making sure everything is running smooth. Quick and responsive.

[zenitzz]

I think there is no use voting is done about this, at least each individual has the advantages of each in terms of arranging a signature campaign.

[NeuroticFish]

I dont know about all of those campaign managers,but i am in a signature campaign which is manages greately by Yahoo62278.He accepted by application just about an hour i posted that,so no time wasting and always i got payment every weak in time,and i see him manage other campaigns here as well,so he is the best campaign manager for me.

What you just posted is exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing, what you should post is something that a campaign manager did that is not part of his task or going above and beyod his role as a campaign manager.

Actually there are good (actually very good) campaign managers that didn't handle applications within an hour. So while not handling your request within 1h is not a minus, handling it so quick is a plus.
There are campaigns that had delayed payments - and most of the times it was not campaign manager's fault - so this can count as a luck factor or it can be related to how good the campaign manager checked the campaign owner before accepting the position.

So imho utkarshm has indeed posted some pluses, not something "exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing".

[jacktheking]

Sadly Carra23 and izanagi is not on the list. The only signature campaign manager that I have had and is on the list is marcotheminer. However, there is some problem with his campaign's bot and payment was not made on time usually. So I guess I cannot vote for him. I just joined my current campaign last week and do not have enough information about the manager.

[JeffBrad12]

I dont know about all of those campaign managers,but i am in a signature campaign which is manages greately by Yahoo62278.He accepted by application just about an hour i posted that,so no time wasting and always i got payment every weak in time,and i see him manage other campaigns here as well,so he is the best campaign manager for me.

What you just posted is exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing, what you should post is something that a campaign manager did that is not part of his task or going above and beyod his role as a campaign manager.

Actually there are good (actually very good) campaign managers that didn't handle applications within an hour. So while not handling your request within 1h is not a minus, handling it so quick is a plus.
There are campaigns that had delayed payments - and most of the times it was not campaign manager's fault - so this can count as a luck factor or it can be related to how good the campaign manager checked the campaign owner before accepting the position.

So imho utkarshm has indeed posted some pluses, not something "exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing".

This is just my opinions if the yahoo is more getting an easier in the selection of participant, maybe the another reason behind of them is said about that.

[senyorito123]

I dont know about all of those campaign managers,but i am in a signature campaign which is manages greately by Yahoo62278.He accepted by application just about an hour i posted that,so no time wasting and always i got payment every weak in time,and i see him manage other campaigns here as well,so he is the best campaign manager for me.

What you just posted is exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing, what you should post is something that a campaign manager did that is not part of his task or going above and beyod his role as a campaign manager.

Actually there are good (actually very good) campaign managers that didn't handle applications within an hour. So while not handling your request within 1h is not a minus, handling it so quick is a plus.
There are campaigns that had delayed payments - and most of the times it was not campaign manager's fault - so this can count as a luck factor or it can be related to how good the campaign manager checked the campaign owner before accepting the position.

So imho utkarshm has indeed posted some pluses, not something "exactly what a campaign manager should do and I bet all those listed are doing the same thing".

This is just my opinions if the yahoo is more getting an easier in the selection of participant, maybe the another reason behind of them is said about that.

Yahoo is good at selecting here participants and it matter that he have his very own criteria and selection among those who will gonna be his participant, yahoo is strict interms on post quality and also he gives chances for those one who needs to improve, and i don't get so surprise if companies will select him as their campaign manager since he is reputed one upon running a sig on his own hand.

[hasiramasenju]

i vote for Yahoo62278 and i have been working under him once time several month ago and all went smoothly untill the end of campaign and also he has the most active campaign manager in this forum because almost been online every day and every hours

[passivebesiege]

Ill vote for yahoo62278, for many reasons , he can manage more campaign at the same time, the payment of their sigcampaign as a manager is fairly. if there's a delay of payment he update it immediately so nl one will be worried about the payment. And last he really active here in this forum.

[Kolder]

Ill vote for yahoo62278, for many reasons , he can manage more campaign at the same time, the payment of their sigcampaign as a manager is fairly. if there's a delay of payment he update it immediately so nl one will be worried about the payment. And last he really active here in this forum.

Other campaign manager did the same as you mention above, except for others that have a problem on receiving funds from owner, But all of them do great job.

_______________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________

Almost 3 weeks Left to vote for your favorite/beloved campaign manager, Let's support them in exchange for their great service they provide on managing our campaigns that we join.

[BAGOBO]

Vote Yahoo as good campaign manager as I can see he accept on range great poster ~ Best poster
Meanwhile other campaign manager are too strict because they seeking best poster only

[Kolder]

Vote Yahoo as good campaign manager as I can see he accept on range great poster ~ Best poster
Meanwhile other campaign manager are too strict because they seeking best poster only

It is bettet to accept only a quality poster to avoid spamming on the forum. signature campaign is the major cause of many spam post here in the forum. So im very for all managers that very strict on accepting their applicants

[BlockEye]

Sadly Carra23 and izanagi is not on the list. The only signature campaign manager that I have had and is on the list is marcotheminer. However, there is some problem with his campaign's bot and payment was not made on time usually. So I guess I cannot vote for him. I just joined my current campaign last week and do not have enough information about the manager.

Theyn are not handling any campaigns as far I know. Izanagis name waa changed or rather name waa retained but now theres a last name.

[x4]

Vote Yahoo as good campaign manager as I can see he accept on range great poster ~ Best poster
Meanwhile other campaign manager are too strict because they seeking best poster only

Yes I'm with bro and I guess its not really required to have a member in a signature campaign that will write a reply with very long posts. That thought is if he replies with the topic and with sense and even its just 2-3 liner post its enough for being a good poster not that you have write a  long story post so you can be accepted in a descent campaign.

[Barbut]

I vote for a manager that I know, he is very dedicated and he always finish everything on time. I also like when manger have communication with participants, post news and changes on time.
There isn't manager of my signature campaign in this list, I know its a new profile and probably its someone's alt, but he is doing his job very good.
Managers from this list are doing good work, everyone has some criteria and they save this forum to not become one big spam thread.

[Strongkored]

i'm ready vote, I'm sure all campaign manager will do his best for his campaign going well as this will greatly affect the good name and no one will risk his reputation, and sometimes our opinion becomes subjective because if we are ever rejected in one campaign which manage the person will make us consider the person is not capable, but we'll assume the person is capable because we received in they campaign 

[JeffBrad12]

Vote Yahoo as good campaign manager as I can see he accept on range great poster ~ Best poster
Meanwhile other campaign manager are too strict because they seeking best poster only

It is bettet to accept only a quality poster to avoid spamming on the forum. signature campaign is the major cause of many spam post here in the forum. So im very for all managers that very strict on accepting their applicants

But yahoo is needed for increasing their qualification for choosing the participant cause I always see the yahoo's participant makes a spam. maybe yahoo needs making their qualification is more strict. just my criticism.

[Lion BItcoin Shop]

i think  Yahoo62278 is good manager
vote for his great work.

[rindo]

I think all the catagory Who Best Campaign Manager there,They are is awesome people because many people want to promote site or project entrust the job to them for manage their Signature campaign,,but if i should pick,I pick yahoo62278 

[ultrloa]

Vote Yahoo as good campaign manager as I can see he accept on range great poster ~ Best poster
Meanwhile other campaign manager are too strict because they seeking best poster only

It is bettet to accept only a quality poster to avoid spamming on the forum. signature campaign is the major cause of many spam post here in the forum. So im very for all managers that very strict on accepting their applicants

But yahoo is needed for increasing their qualification for choosing the participant cause I always see the yahoo's participant makes a spam. maybe yahoo needs making their qualification is more strict. just my criticism.

Your criticism is good and maybe yahoo will see and improve this one, and im agree upon selecting yahoo as best but theirs actually many of them of who got more qualified like SFR and zengryT as you can see at their feedbacks, you can say their doing a good job upon participants selection since they are meticolous on selecting on who they select and what time of post are acceptable to them, and other who listed their will need to improve more since majority votes are very  importanr thing since it is a feedback on how they run on their certain campaigns.

[bitjoin]

I cant see any of the statistics of this poll, i put in a vote.  I guess we have to wait for results?