chodpaba (OP)
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 30, 2013, 04:18:55 PM
Last edit: January 17, 2014, 06:45:29 AM by chodpaba |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin BEAR
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:23:27 PM |
|
I know you know some shit about some shit, but LOL! Not this rally
|
|
|
|
|
|
yokosan
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:25:41 PM |
|
(√(1024))*2 = 64
Just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Lambert
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:34:09 PM |
|
Just saying.
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic? 2009+5=2014 |
Use CoinBR to trade bitcoin stocks: CoinBR.comThe best place for betting with bitcoin: BitBet.us |
|
|
|
checkers6676
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:35:33 PM |
|
Just saying.
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic? 2009+5=2014 by god, you heard it here first folks! bitcoin will be $2014 in 5 days! |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin BEAR
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:35:56 PM |
|
I know you know some shit about some shit, but LOL! Not this rally
I am saying, we have yet to see exuberance. I am also saying—2 years. Fair 'nuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinbear
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:44:19 PM |
|
I know you know some shit about some shit, but LOL! Not this rally
I am saying, we have yet to see exuberance. I am also saying—2 years. Fair 'nuff! Hey, are you stealing my name? Don't listen to this poser, he clearly is trying to imitate me badly! |
|
|
|
|
chrsjrcj
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:53:04 PM |
|
32^4= 1048576 Billionaire!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rothgar
|
|
March 30, 2013, 04:59:31 PM |
|
5*2 = 10
I just had to get that off my chest. Thanks!!!
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
|
|
March 30, 2013, 05:02:04 PM |
|
Quick, have you heard? 1 + 1 = 2
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy
|
|
March 30, 2013, 05:06:17 PM |
|
Sup Butter  |
Elon Krusky
|
|
|
|
ehoffman
|
|
March 30, 2013, 06:16:07 PM |
|
√(-1) = 1i... But that's probably too "complex" for OP  |
Like my comments? Cheer me up at 137s1qFV63M6SXWhKkwjaZKEeZX23pq1hw Don't like my comments, donate to the BCRT (better comment research team) here at 1A1PbZypjEe7yanj69ApVS1FhK8UMW7Wdc |
|
|
|
waspoza
|
|
March 30, 2013, 06:21:21 PM |
|
Just saying.
So you saying that bubble will burst at $1024 in two years? |
|
|
|
|
BTC Books
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2013, 08:46:40 PM |
|
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba. You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread? He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading. |
Dankedan: price seems low, time to sell I think...
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 30, 2013, 09:02:17 PM |
|
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba. You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread? He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading. Shhh... Everyone was supposed to forget about that by now. How well does your model handle the current situation of continuously breaking new highs? Wasn't it based on historical volume at various prices? |
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 30, 2013, 09:14:08 PM |
|
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba. You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread? He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading. Shhh... Everyone was supposed to forget about that by now. How well does your model handle the current situation of continuously breaking new highs? Wasn't it based on historical volume at various prices? There is still a lot of unbroken ground with that idea, but I have been moving along another development path. Mostly, what I am seeing tells me to hold on for the ride. I it is perilous to try to trade on a parabolic slope. The only reason I am saying anything is because I am not trading. If that changes I will probably clam up. You heard it here folks, when Chodpaba quits posting the top is in! |
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
March 30, 2013, 09:18:40 PM |
|
x = y = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
|
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Nancarrow
|
|
March 30, 2013, 09:22:50 PM |
|
So this is a thread for us all to post basic arithmetical calculations is it?
Well I'd tell you what 911 x 2356 is, but I've heard nobody knows.
|
If I've said anything amusing and/or informative and you're feeling generous:
1GNJq39NYtf7cn2QFZZuP5vmC1mTs63rEW
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
March 30, 2013, 09:31:12 PM |
|
x = y = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
When it comes to money and markets things are a little less Bertrand Russell than you might expect—and a little more Ursula K. Le Guin than you might expect. I know...while taking Calculus 4 I also took Econ 101. I skipped a lot of the Econ classes because "it's just simple arithmetic" right? Not so much...I think I got a D in Econ 101. Crazy voodoo math. I later took Accounting for my Master's degree and determined not to make the same mistake I listened to the lecture on credits and debits about 20 times until it finally "clicked". After failing the first few homework/quizzes, after it clicked I finally got it and finished the course with a B. |
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin. |
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 30, 2013, 10:02:28 PM |
|
x = y = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
Yes, if you allow division of zero you can prove almost any mathematical lie. |
|
|
|
|
