🚀[ANN] Nexium [NXC]- Beyond the Void: First blockchain RTS

[Academician]

Thing that most confuse me right now is that i cant see Nexium richlist. Can some Ethereum expert help me with that please.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x45e42D659D9f9466cD5DF622506033145a9b89Bc

There is no RichList
He speaks about TOP 100 of the richest addresses.
How to see them here?

What do you mean?
There a lot of Token Holder Address, for example this wallet have about 15% of nexium
https://etherscan.io/token/0x45e42D659D9f9466cD5DF622506033145a9b89Bc?a=0xe022cd6bf97b1d4319de299d0a654162040112c2

[1715156515]

1715156515

[1715156515]

1715156515

[1715156515]

1715156515

[sulfurtank]

Thing that most confuse me right now is that i cant see Nexium richlist. Can some Ethereum expert help me with that please.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x45e42D659D9f9466cD5DF622506033145a9b89Bc

There is no RichList
He speaks about TOP 100 of the richest addresses.
How to see them here?

If it's trading on bittrex u can inspect the wealth distribution on an exchange tab. If no then u can only guess who constitutes the top richest of Void network.

[Beyond the Void]

Can a Beyond the Void DEV confirm?

When you buy something in our shop, the half is burnt and the other half goes to us (devs)?

If so, what are you gonna do with all that NXC? Is owning half the supply not enough?  

We are a company, selling products. Our product now is the game Beyond the Void, and selling game assets is part of our economy. We chose to burn half of the NxC to increase the token scarcity.
The ETH/BCY we got from the ICO are meant to be spent on the game's develop only. Once all of that is spent, we need an income to continue the adventure.

About the timeline: for now, we only released the timeline until the game's release (and I have news so I'll update it soon). But the game has to continue improving even after the release. We will update it, create new assets, new event cards, develop the gameplay. And of course we have to maintain the servers, correct bugs etc.

Same goes for the promotion: 15 million NxC seem to be a lot, but not when you think that it's for three of four years. Also, most of those will be spent to promote the game, and the game is not out yet (first beta is coming soon though).

About the rich list: we don't have a tool allowing to see the richest address. We could check from time to time, but it would always be the richest addresses at that time. Everything is on the blockchain anyway of course, but that's there we are at now.

[Xtrata]

Can a Beyond the Void DEV confirm?

When you buy something in our shop, the half is burnt and the other half goes to us (devs)?

If so, what are you gonna do with all that NXC? Is owning half the supply not enough?  

We are a company, selling products. Our product now is the game Beyond the Void, and selling game assets is part of our economy. We chose to burn half of the NxC to increase the token scarcity.
The ETH/BCY we got from the ICO are meant to be spent on the game's develop only. Once all of that is spent, we need an income to continue the adventure.

About the timeline: for now, we only released the timeline until the game's release (and I have news so I'll update it soon). But the game has to continue improving even after the release. We will update it, create new assets, new event cards, develop the gameplay. And of course we have to maintain the servers, correct bugs etc.

Same goes for the promotion: 15 million NxC seem to be a lot, but not when you think that it's for three of four years. Also, most of those will be spent to promote the game, and the game is not out yet (first beta is coming soon though).

About the rich list: we don't have a tool allowing to see the richest address. We could check from time to time, but it would always be the richest addresses at that time. Everything is on the blockchain anyway of course, but that's there we are at now.

You could show us your walletadress and other devs so we can see that the coins/tokens are actually there and same goes for the coins/tokens for promotion. If it is as you said that you have no interest in selling there shouldn't be a problem for you to provide these.

The fact that you haven't done that from the start is really bad, you want us to trust you and use/play your game and even trade the token you created so the least you could do is give us that.

[marcous]

Here is the repartition of the first 15 Million NxC between the 4 teammates:

Maxence 6 Million
Eric 4 Million
Rémi 4 Million
Manon 1 Million

give us all this 4 addresses..

We are not interested in dumping Nexiums on the market. And the value of the Nexium is tied to the success of the game so we are focusing on releasing a good game and on time.

really..!? you already done that when it first day at polo. remember!

[Beyond the Void]

Here is the repartition of the first 15 Million NxC between the 4 teammates:

Maxence 6 Million
Eric 4 Million
Rémi 4 Million
Manon 1 Million

give us all this 4 addresses..

We are not interested in dumping Nexiums on the market. And the value of the Nexium is tied to the success of the game so we are focusing on releasing a good game and on time.

really..!? you already done that when it first day at polo. remember!

We didn't sell Nexium on Poloniex the first day of listing, so that would be someone else.

[kampretkabur]

Here is the repartition of the first 15 Million NxC between the 4 teammates:

Maxence 6 Million
Eric 4 Million
Rémi 4 Million
Manon 1 Million

give us all this 4 addresses..

We are not interested in dumping Nexiums on the market. And the value of the Nexium is tied to the success of the game so we are focusing on releasing a good game and on time.

really..!? you already done that when it first day at polo. remember!

We didn't sell Nexium on Poloniex the first day of listing, so that would be someone else.

Address please?

[Academician]

first beta is coming soon though

First half of February? When?

[Academician]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

[Xtrata]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

Why wouldn't you want to see that they actually kept their word on not being interested to sell?

Why shouldn't we see it, what is it that need to be hidden? We know the amount so let us see the wallets, if they want people to invest in NXC they need to show their premine of 30M coins/tokens.

[Academician]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

Why wouldn't you want to see that they actually kept their word on not being interested to sell?

Why shouldn't we see it, what is it that need to be hidden? We know the amount so let us see the wallets, if they want people to invest in NXC they need to show their premine of 30M coins/tokens.

Intresting question.
First of all, let's see other project which create ICO. Many of them have created with an illusory idea of the future, without any products and trading in major exchanges. So why people belive them and send their money, for example Synereo. Initially, it was clear that no social networks will not be, so developers are playing for time and backers money, and what came of it in the end? Or another shit 1CR.

There we see that, the small team(remember, the little team the most cohesive and achieve great success) are developing cool product, and following the logic, that is stupid step to sell all coins at start. It's simple math and psychology. When the beta will be realise, we will see increase of interest and demand, so the price up, and sell assets will be much more profitable.

[Xtrata]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

Why wouldn't you want to see that they actually kept their word on not being interested to sell?

Why shouldn't we see it, what is it that need to be hidden? We know the amount so let us see the wallets, if they want people to invest in NXC they need to show their premine of 30M coins/tokens.

Intresting question.
First of all, let's see other project which create ICO. Many of them have created with an illusory idea of the future, without any products and trading in major exchanges. So why people belive them and send their money, for example Synereo. Initially, it was clear that no social networks will not be, so developers are playing for time and backers money, and what came of it in the end? Or another shit 1CR.

There we see that, the small team(remember, the little team the most cohesive and achieve great success) are developing cool product, and following the logic, that is stupid step to sell all coins at start. It's simple math and psychology. When the beta will be realise, we will see increase of interest and demand, so the price up, and sell assets will be much more profitable.

It might be stupid in your opinion but money is needed to survive no matter if it might be less money by selling early. It is kinda delusional to think that you will get more demand and increased interest in NXC if people cannot even track half of the available supply.

So far we have a "product" that noone but the developers tried and showed videos of, which is just as much AMP and other chaotic ICO's also were able to provide.

[Academician]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

Why wouldn't you want to see that they actually kept their word on not being interested to sell?

Why shouldn't we see it, what is it that need to be hidden? We know the amount so let us see the wallets, if they want people to invest in NXC they need to show their premine of 30M coins/tokens.

Intresting question.
First of all, let's see other project which create ICO. Many of them have created with an illusory idea of the future, without any products and trading in major exchanges. So why people belive them and send their money, for example Synereo. Initially, it was clear that no social networks will not be, so developers are playing for time and backers money, and what came of it in the end? Or another shit 1CR.

There we see that, the small team(remember, the little team the most cohesive and achieve great success) are developing cool product, and following the logic, that is stupid step to sell all coins at start. It's simple math and psychology. When the beta will be realise, we will see increase of interest and demand, so the price up, and sell assets will be much more profitable.

It might be stupid in your opinion but money is needed to survive no matter if it might be less money by selling early. It is kinda delusional to think that you will get more demand and increased interest in NXC if people cannot even track half of the available supply.

So far we have a "product" that noone but the developers tried and showed videos of, which is just as much AMP and other chaotic ICO's also were able to provide.

ok, I will admit that I was wrong, if the beta version will not be released in February/March, or the game will be really full shit, but this is unlikely to happen.

[Xtrata]

I dont understand, why you need walletaddress?

Even if we imagine that the developers have merged half of their assets, it's nothing change, because they want to eat too 

Second, I've been wondering, other developers also show their assets?

Why wouldn't you want to see that they actually kept their word on not being interested to sell?

Why shouldn't we see it, what is it that need to be hidden? We know the amount so let us see the wallets, if they want people to invest in NXC they need to show their premine of 30M coins/tokens.

Intresting question.
First of all, let's see other project which create ICO. Many of them have created with an illusory idea of the future, without any products and trading in major exchanges. So why people belive them and send their money, for example Synereo. Initially, it was clear that no social networks will not be, so developers are playing for time and backers money, and what came of it in the end? Or another shit 1CR.

There we see that, the small team(remember, the little team the most cohesive and achieve great success) are developing cool product, and following the logic, that is stupid step to sell all coins at start. It's simple math and psychology. When the beta will be realise, we will see increase of interest and demand, so the price up, and sell assets will be much more profitable.

It might be stupid in your opinion but money is needed to survive no matter if it might be less money by selling early. It is kinda delusional to think that you will get more demand and increased interest in NXC if people cannot even track half of the available supply.

So far we have a "product" that noone but the developers tried and showed videos of, which is just as much AMP and other chaotic ICO's also were able to provide.

ok, I will admit that I was wrong, if the beta version will not be released in February/March, or the game will be really full shit, but this is unlikely to happen.

I do think that they are working on the game and it will probably be great. But it doesn't change my opinion that the whole premine should be able to be seen by anyone, it is shady to hide it and avoid questions about it and also twist words on how much they actually hold.

[kampretkabur]

In people minds, we hold 50% of the token. This is not right: there is not one address with 50% of NxC total supply on it.

Here is the repartition of the first 15 Million NxC between the 4 teammates:

Maxence 6 Million
Eric 4 Million
Rémi 4 Million
Manon 1 Million

We are still separated entities, so nobody holds more than 6 Million. Also, there are backers that hold more than us (more than 6 Million). So Maxence, who is the original creator in this project, actually holds less than our biggest backer.
We actually worked a lot to bring this project to life, including lots of months where we weren't paid and we chose to be rewarded for that. This is a matter of choice of course so there is no point in discussing it now on bitcointalk.

The next 15 Million Nexiums are meant to be spent on promotion (we already spent some on those, and I'll publish soon a marketing strategy & budget). We promoted the ICO, we are now published on Forbes, listed on Poloniex and so on.

We are not interested in dumping Nexiums on the market. And the value of the Nexium is tied to the success of the game so we are focusing on releasing a good game and on time.

Just read this and lol'd. You dont hold 50% yes, it should be about 45% now if you havent sold it of course. There is not 1 address with the 30M doesnt mean you dont have it, right? (once again,  if you havent sold it yet it)
You already spent some of the 15M from promotional purpose? So thats you sold on the 2nd day? So youre not interested in dumping it on the market, how did you sell it?

ok, I will admit that I was wrong, if the beta version will not be released in February/March, or the game will be really full shit, but this is unlikely to happen.

Are you Maxence, Eric, Rémi, or Manon?

[Beyond the Void]

I am Manon, and I am the only member of the team posting here, under the name Beyond the Void.

[Academician]

Are you Maxence, Eric, Rémi, or Manon?

No one of them, just like the concept and idea of the game, at all. I do not advocate the game or developers. I just do not understand why in the beginning it is necessary to state that the project scam.

[kampretkabur]

Are you Maxence, Eric, Rémi, or Manon?

No one of them, just like the concept and idea of the game, at all. I do not advocate the game or developers. I just do not understand why in the beginning it is necessary to state that the project scam.

Asking for transparency = calling it scam?

[Academician]

Are you Maxence, Eric, Rémi, or Manon?

No one of them, just like the concept and idea of the game, at all. I do not advocate the game or developers. I just do not understand why in the beginning it is necessary to state that the project scam.

Asking for transparency = calling it scam?

Noooo! it's not about you! 
Read the first, second page of the topic, where some message about project scam

[Xtrata]

I am Manon, and I am the only member of the team posting here, under the name Beyond the Void.

So when are you going to answer people's concerns here? Been almost over 1 week now and we cannot even get a proper answer.