Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 08:10:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pool endorsements?  (Read 964 times)
grue (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431



View Profile
June 13, 2011, 03:57:43 PM
 #1

I've noticed that there are some pools that are stickied in the pools subforum. Does this imply endorsement by the moderators/administration? I don't think it's a good idea to sticky the biggest pools, or any pools for that matter, because it kills the whole point of decentralization.

There has been a thread on this before, but for some reason, the pools have been re-stickied.
Unstickied and sorted.

I don't think it was necessary a bad idea. He did it before I created the subcategories. Having all the major options stickied seems helpful to me. (I don't read the mining section, though.)

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Adblock for annoying signature ads | Enhanced Merit UI
1714810213
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714810213

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714810213
Reply with quote  #2

1714810213
Report to moderator
1714810213
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714810213

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714810213
Reply with quote  #2

1714810213
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714810213
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714810213

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714810213
Reply with quote  #2

1714810213
Report to moderator
Dobrodav
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 13, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
 #2

i am believe that any pool that act more than a months , can be sticked, if their owners will post moderator.

grue (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431



View Profile
June 16, 2011, 09:41:08 PM
 #3

is any administrator going to do anything about this? The only thing pinning/stickying  a pool does is create mega pools that could compromise the network.

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Adblock for annoying signature ads | Enhanced Merit UI
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12968


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 01:05:02 AM
 #4

I don't see a problem with stickying the major ones.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
REF
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 529
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 01:25:12 AM
 #5

I dont see why they should be pinned. A large pool doesnt mean its better then any of the small ones.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12968


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 01:34:36 AM
 #6

Maybe you can solicit comments about it in a topic in the mining section. I don't visit the mining section, so I'm not sure what's appropriate.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
lizthegrey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 04:05:54 AM
 #7

Stickying the largest pools causes them to only get larger, unfortunately, which is a risk to the health of bitcoin due to both the 51% problem and the attractive DoS target problem :/
yeponlyone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 17, 2011, 05:22:16 AM
 #8

Stickying the largest pools causes them to only get larger, unfortunately, which is a risk to the health of bitcoin due to both the 51% problem and the attractive DoS target problem :/

It amazes me that anyone who has spent anytime studying bitcoin cannot grasp this very fundamental concept.  I guess we just have gotta deal with them.. man i could rant and rant about the dangers of large mining pools, but if it hasn't been grasped by this point, i don't just know what could be said.. it brings up so many emotions, i get angry that people can be so dumb, but it also makes me sad for them, like what happens in there brain? why do they have to live with such a brain, why am i so fortunate to not have to be so naive. maybe there is an certain ecstasy to this stupidity? should i be jealous, is common sense in some ways a burden? i just don't know. it truly is mind boggling. for those, who certainly exist, that have not been able to follow along with what i've said - yes, sticky mining pools, especially the big ones are a bad idea, a very bad idea. maybe try reading the wiki and then closing your eyes and just let it absorb in your brain. just sit in silence and let your brain process.
Anonymous
Guest

June 17, 2011, 05:43:27 AM
 #9

It's in no pools best interest to destroy the currency. Pool advertisements will not be the end of Bitcoin as we know it. DeepBit has corrected itself over being 50% and I'm certain it won't be the last. If even a large minority knows the dangers of a pool that is too large, things will correct itself and no tyrant will destroy nor manipulate the chain. Even in that case, a forking of the chain will occur.

In addition, this is a private forum. Anything is up for advertisement. There should be no real expectation of what can and cannot be endorsed.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!