![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 28, 2012, 02:33:19 AM Last edit: September 28, 2012, 02:43:43 AM by ianbakewell |
|
I side with Bob, simply because I find the literal idea of buying silence ... I don't know the words, but I do not like it. If that part of the deal was fairly assigned value, then I think he should send that part back and be done with it. The issue with assigning a value to the silence part, would be assuming Bob took it as payment for that in the first place.
Would I have been an observer in the live chat, I would have assumed Usagi was overpaying, and doing so to shut Bob up, but not in the literal sense of a scammer tag, more in the line of, "the customer is always right, heres your refund, get out of my store... I have better things to do" you know, like most retail places will "shut you up" should you be unhappy and loud.
|