Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2022, 08:11:07 AM *
News: Bitcointalk Community Awards
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rangeproof in Mimblewimble?  (Read 929 times)
Amitabh S (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1001
Merit: 1002


View Profile
October 05, 2016, 03:18:02 PM
 #1

First of all, I must say its a very interesting idea. Somehow I couldn't find efficient NIZK range proofs and the mimblewimble paper kind of assumes it as "obvious".

Maybe I missed something but please point me to some efficient implementation of range proofs.

BTW the whitepaper is here
https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/mimblewimble.txt

Coinsecure referral ID: https://coinsecure.in/signup/refamit (use this link to signup)
1670659867
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670659867

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670659867
Reply with quote  #2

1670659867
Report to moderator
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 7220



View Profile
October 05, 2016, 08:03:05 PM
 #2

First of all, I must say its a very interesting idea. Somehow I couldn't find efficient NIZK range proofs and the mimblewimble paper kind of assumes it as "obvious".

Maybe I missed something but please point me to some efficient implementation of range proofs.

BTW the whitepaper is here
https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/mimblewimble.txt

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1085273.0
kushti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
October 06, 2016, 10:02:02 AM
 #3

Any security proofs behind both CT/MW schemes? both are looking pretty controversial in current form

Ergo Platform core dev. Previously IOHK Research / Nxt core dev / SmartContract.com cofounder.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 7220



View Profile
October 18, 2016, 08:39:47 AM
 #4

looking pretty controversial in current form
You are calling a binary decomposition range proof controversial? Really?
kushti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2016, 08:46:24 AM
 #5

looking pretty controversial in current form
You are calling a binary decomposition range proof controversial? Really?


What are you talking about? Don't see any security proofs there: https://people.xiph.org/~greg/confidential_values.txt. Please provide a link.

Ergo Platform core dev. Previously IOHK Research / Nxt core dev / SmartContract.com cofounder.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!