No Trump or Clinton? whose left? Who would you vote for?

[DigitalCurrencyConsultant]

Ok so pretend you don't know these people try hard ok now if they where not running Who would you vote for and why if you have one
                       



Let's pretend you have four other choices:

#1


             
Darrell Castle of Tennessee and running mate Scott Bradley of Utah
Pro-Crypto Rights states on his website
Party Website: http://www.constitutionparty.com/
Presidential Website: http://castle2016.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DarrellCastle


#2


                       
Gary Johnson Former Governor New Mexico Running Mate for VP Bill Weld Former Governor of Massachusetts
Pro-Crypto rights)
https://www.johnsonweld.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GovGaryJohnson

#3


                   
Dr. Jill Stein M.D. of Massachusetts with her running mate Ajamu Baraka of Virginia
http://www.jill2016.com/
Twitter https://twitter.com/DrJillStein
 

#4
Other person not listed here

[1714272246]

1714272246

[1714272246]

1714272246

[igorokavg13]

For anyone would not have voted. In order to vote you need to know what to expect from them and I don't know.

[Sanekavg13]

I'd still vote for Hillary. Then you will see that I was right. Although it is not ideal but it is not for anyone.

[AmDD]

Johnson. Id vote for him because of the candidates Ive looked into, my ideas are most aligned with his. There is no one who will be 100% perfect nor is there anyone who will make 100% of everyone happy in every case so we have to try and pick someone who is most well rounded and will benefit the majority. Gary Johnson is my pick as of today.

[dimonchik13]

Unfortunately while they are all good candidates. As soon as they become presidents, they have all the good qualities kudato lost.

[gentlemand]

Out of pure curiosity I'd like to see how a libertarian president would operate so it's Johnson for me. But no one should pay any attention to my opinion. I voted for my last candidate because she liked driving tiny trains around.

[bitcoinboy12]

Out of pure curiosity I'd like to see how a libertarian president would operate so it's Johnson for me. But no one should pay any attention to my opinion. I voted for my last candidate because she liked driving tiny trains around.

From an onlookers point of view, whichever result this might be would almost always mean trouble brewing up. I guess this can't really be helped. Trump and Clinton might be qualified to run for the presidency, but everyone knows they are not qualified to lead as a president.

[DigitalCurrencyConsultant]

Out of pure curiosity I'd like to see how a libertarian president would operate so it's Johnson for me. But no one should pay any attention to my opinion. I voted for my last candidate because she liked driving tiny trains around.

From an onlookers point of view, whichever result this might be would almost always mean trouble brewing up. I guess this can't really be helped. Trump and Clinton might be qualified to run for the presidency, but everyone knows they are not qualified to lead as a president.

However, what is the qualifications to run for President or be President?? that may be something else to every other person. But born in America and be of age to run.

Second if there was no Trump or Clinton so nobody gets in a shouting match.. who would be your favorite off that list..

[Tyrantt]

I'd still vote for Hillary. Then you will see that I was right. Although it is not ideal but it is not for anyone.

I'm really interested, as a non American citizen, whats the main reason(s) that make you vote for Hillary?

[saddampbuh]

david duke

[BADecker]

Since there are so many dead people voting these days - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/204937-2016-10-06-dead-people-and-illegal-immigrants-are-being-registered-to-vote.htm - Why not vote for a dead person for every office in Government, and shut the thing down?

[DigitalCurrencyConsultant]

david duke

So that would be in choice #4 huh

[DigitalCurrencyConsultant]

Since there are so many dead people voting these days - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/204937-2016-10-06-dead-people-and-illegal-immigrants-are-being-registered-to-vote.htm - Why not vote for a dead person for every office in Government, and shut the thing down?

that would be a interesting outcome // wonder if it still would be rigged

[groll]

Okay then I would go for 2, the tandem of Darrell.  I just saw that they were pro-crypto and do I need to explain?  Well, they maybe into more new methods and innovations on how to reduce poverty around the globe.  They will lead only one country, the US, but we know that US has been a hero for helping the entire planet when they need to help.  Since they are new into politics, maybe they have better ideals and methods.  Fresh faces means fresh ideas.

[gentlemand]

david duke

So that would be in choice #4 huh

Nah. He really, really, really wants to vote for RuPaul but doesn't have what it takes to admit it out in the open.

[CoolJakeB]

Now if there was no Trump or Clinton, the Republican and Democratic parties would elect other nominees, but I assume you mean to say if there was no Republican or Democratic running this year. If I have only those four choices that you listed, I would probably vote for Gary Johnson, since I feel he is more qualified to be President than either Jill Stein or Darrell Castle, or any other unknowns running for office, even though Johnson has had some stumbles in recent weeks.

[BADecker]

2016 -- The Year America Realized the Inevitable Result of Constantly Choosing ...

Election after election, Americans sat idly by as decent candidates who challenged the status quo were shunned and dismissed by the media as unelectable. All the while, demagogues on power trips were continually thrust into the limelight as the only viable options. Well, the chickens are finally coming home to roost.

Exactly how nonsensical the 2016 presidential election could get — and how far mainstream media would go to distort facts and significance — received a resounding answer this week, thanks to Wikileaks first massive disclosure of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta's hacked emails and the oh-so-convenient twin reminder from the DNC via the media that Trump said some awfully lewd and disgraceful shit some 12 years ago.

While the two campaigns are now lobbing barbs at one another over the supposed revelations (the sensible among us knew all along to be true), the corporate media presstitutes busied themselves condemning all things Trump — while pretending not to notice the ginormous implications of any number of eye-popping disclosures about Clinton found in the Podesta leak.

Let's face it, America — we're doing it wrong.

Perhaps this first installment of Julian Assange's long-awaited October Surprise should have fallen in our laps in the nascent stages of Clinton's bid for the White House. Perhaps the Washington Post — in virtual certain coordination with the DNC and/or Clinton campaign — should have let slip the repulsive Trump video when he first began to lead the field of GOP presidential hopefuls.

Perhaps Hillary's perfect track record of fabrication, mendacity, near — if not outright — criminal behavior, and interminable list of scandals should have nullified any integrity for the presidency in the American public's collective mind, if not landed her behind bars, years ago.

Perhaps Trump's laughably false reputation as businessman extraordinaire, despite a history replete with scamming, conning, shortchanging, failing to pay, lawsuits, swindles, bankruptcies, and, oh yeah, those not-at-all worrisome underage rape allegations and the aforementioned statements, from his own mouth, about forcing himself on women against their will, should have prohibited any intimation of hopes for the White House before the thought ever crossed his mind.

Apparently none of these matters occurred to any of the players involved — or, maybe they did — and strategy dictated their timing less than a month prior to the national election because, at this point, it's too late for America to reverse its idiotic, failed-from-jump-street course toward utter disaster.

We're not only speeding toward the edge of a perilous cliff, but arguing over who should steer the wheel — leaving no one competent enough available to man the brakes.

It's additionally entirely possible control of the wheel won't matter, considering the current driver's obstinance might first divert us into full-scale world — if not nuclear — war.

War, it should be noted, that will be funded through debt and with our tax dollars.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/53138-2/.

[EnacDomains]

I'd go al gore

[notbatman]

[xht]

If nobody likes Hillary and Trump - then why are they leading? Somebody is voting for them.