Trump on his last leg?

[bryant.coleman]

Trump on his last leg wins the election.

Comeback story of 2016/2017.

 

It was not a comeback. Trump was always ahead, but the polls couldn't measure his support accurately (just like they miscalculated Bernie Sanders' support levels during the Michigan Democrat primary). The main reason was that in the blue states (such as Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan.etc), a part of the Trump supporters refused to reveal that they are voting for him.

[CC-Resurgam]

Trump on his last leg wins the election.

Comeback story of 2016/2017.

 

Trump really deserve to win the election. He is the man destined to stop the abnormality and immorality of amercans. He is taking away the rights of LGBT which is the right thing to do, there are only two genders in this world man and women and the LGBT also falls on that area and having an LGBT right is unfair to other normal citizens. Another thing he is against abortion and as a president I salute him for upholding the right to life of the fetus who has already a life.

He is destined to stop immorality of Americans? and yet you applaud him on taking away basic human rights of people you disagree with? saying LGBT is unfair to normal citizens? wtf how is their rights interfering with yours?

And abortion? you may disagree with it but it is a persons right to decide what how they want to live their life. You try to act like you know whats best for America when you misspell "amercans"

Ps its spelled Americans

[Fireblazer]

Trump on his last leg wins the election.

Comeback story of 2016/2017.

 

Trump really deserve to win the election. He is the man destined to stop the abnormality and immorality of amercans. He is taking away the rights of LGBT which is the right thing to do, there are only two genders in this world man and women and the LGBT also falls on that area and having an LGBT right is unfair to other normal citizens. Another thing he is against abortion and as a president I salute him for upholding the right to life of the fetus who has already a life.

He is destined to stop immorality of Americans? and yet you applaud him on taking away basic human rights of people you disagree with? saying LGBT is unfair to normal citizens? wtf how is their rights interfering with yours?

And abortion? you may disagree with it but it is a persons right to decide what how they want to live their life. You try to act like you know whats best for America when you misspell "amercans"

Ps its spelled Americans

Fully support you! Trump is an idiot and a tyrant. He attacked the rights and freedoms of the person. If I had my way I would have him even for one that was impeached! I don't like gays, but I believe that is their problem. The same applies to abortion.

[CC-Resurgam]

Fully support you! Trump is an idiot and a tyrant. He attacked the rights and freedoms of the person. If I had my way I would have him even for one that was impeached! I don't like gays, but I believe that is their problem. The same applies to abortion.

The world needs more of that point of view. you can like or dislike whatever you want and that is your right. but that doesnt mean laws should be made on feelings, if you dont like something then dont do it, but do hinder others from doing it. i greatly respect those who dont let preference cloud their judgement. good on you fireblazer

[SameHow]

Fully support you! Trump is an idiot and a tyrant. He attacked the rights and freedoms of the person. If I had my way I would have him even for one that was impeached! I don't like gays, but I believe that is their problem. The same applies to abortion.

The world needs more of that point of view. you can like or dislike whatever you want and that is your right. but that doesnt mean laws should be made on feelings, if you dont like something then dont do it, but do hinder others from doing it. i greatly respect those who dont let preference cloud their judgement. good on you fireblazer

For me, Trump's an idiot, but he was chosen by the Americans. He is the President of the greatest country in the world and it bothers me. Maybe America is not the greatest if its people elect their presidents?

[BADecker]

Democrats Suggest Invoking The 25th Amendment Unless Trump "Gets A Grip"

With a growing number of Democrats openly questioning President Trump's mental health.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) in a floor speech this week called for a review of the Constitution's procedures for removing a president. He warned the 25th Amendment of the Constitution falls short when it comes to mental or emotional fitness for office.

Franken: GOP concerns over Trump mental health

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVH3ZpM2S88


Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-19/democrats-go-there-invoke-25th-amendment-unless-trump-gets-grip.

[Barrymore]

Non criminal illegals, no he does not hate them.

Perhaps that is true. But I want them deported as well, along with their anchor babies. Those who go through the legal route have to wait for 5 or 6 years before they get the clearance. Then why the law breakers should be given preference over them?

You are not right. Inspection of emigrants on the propensity to terrorism and the possibility of adapting in America lasts very long and not always migrants receive a reasoned refusal. Of course the migrants begin to hide from the migration service. And as a result we get a lot of illegal immigrants. Maybe it was necessary to begin not with deportation, and legalization?

[squatz1]

Based fucking timeline we're living in I guess, some people never come to the conclusion that when you're picking between someone who just says mean things and someone who actually does bad things, the American people know which Canaanite to go for.

Trump on his last leg wins the election.

Comeback story of 2016/2017.

 

He even made his quote become true on election day hehe. Comeback kid 2016

“We're going to win so much. You're going to get tired of winning. you’re going to say, ‘Please Mr. President, I have a headache. Please, don't win so much. This is getting terrible.’ And I'm going to say, ‘No, we have to make America great again.’ You're gonna say, ‘Please.’ I said, ‘Nope, nope. We're gonna keep winning.’ - President Donald J Trump

[Sithara007]

Non criminal illegals, no he does not hate them.

Perhaps that is true. But I want them deported as well, along with their anchor babies. Those who go through the legal route have to wait for 5 or 6 years before they get the clearance. Then why the law breakers should be given preference over them?

You are not right. Inspection of emigrants on the propensity to terrorism and the possibility of adapting in America lasts very long and not always migrants receive a reasoned refusal. Of course the migrants begin to hide from the migration service. And as a result we get a lot of illegal immigrants. Maybe it was necessary to begin not with deportation, and legalization?

Legalization of illegal immigrants will be extremely unfair to those who took the legal path. I know someone who is waiting for more than 10 years, to immigrate to the United States. He can't get his visa, despite having family connections in the United States.

[BADecker]

Non criminal illegals, no he does not hate them.

Perhaps that is true. But I want them deported as well, along with their anchor babies. Those who go through the legal route have to wait for 5 or 6 years before they get the clearance. Then why the law breakers should be given preference over them?

You are not right. Inspection of emigrants on the propensity to terrorism and the possibility of adapting in America lasts very long and not always migrants receive a reasoned refusal. Of course the migrants begin to hide from the migration service. And as a result we get a lot of illegal immigrants. Maybe it was necessary to begin not with deportation, and legalization?

Legalization of illegal immigrants will be extremely unfair to those who took the legal path. I know someone who is waiting for more than 10 years, to immigrate to the United States. He can't get his visa, despite having family connections in the United States.

squatz1 is kinda right in the things he says, above your post. In fact, he doesn't say enough.

Where have things ever seemed fair? Think of the people who came to America way back before the United States was a country. Sailing the ocean had many dangers in it. Yet today we cross with ease, in just a few hours by plane.

On the other side, Bitcoin in 2009 was cheap. The early-comers got thousands of bitcoins for a few cents. Now look at how much they cost.

The point is, we all need to look at our best options and use them. America has always been a land of equality among people. Trump is simply taking it back to that somewhat, when others in Government had been trying to take away that freedom and equality.

[criptix]

Non criminal illegals, no he does not hate them.

Perhaps that is true. But I want them deported as well, along with their anchor babies. Those who go through the legal route have to wait for 5 or 6 years before they get the clearance. Then why the law breakers should be given preference over them?

You are not right. Inspection of emigrants on the propensity to terrorism and the possibility of adapting in America lasts very long and not always migrants receive a reasoned refusal. Of course the migrants begin to hide from the migration service. And as a result we get a lot of illegal immigrants. Maybe it was necessary to begin not with deportation, and legalization?

Legalization of illegal immigrants will be extremely unfair to those who took the legal path. I know someone who is waiting for more than 10 years, to immigrate to the United States. He can't get his visa, despite having family connections in the United States.

That means he is just a economic migrant with low/no education and bad job experience.
If  that would not be the case he would have already been accepted through the green/blue card program or as a refugee if he comes from a warzone.

If he has family who is legal in the US they can get him easily to the us. They just need to earn enough money.
And if they are husbands/parents it is becoming even more easy.

[Spendulus]

Non criminal illegals, no he does not hate them.

Perhaps that is true. But I want them deported as well, along with their anchor babies. Those who go through the legal route have to wait for 5 or 6 years before they get the clearance. Then why the law breakers should be given preference over them?

You are not right. Inspection of emigrants on the propensity to terrorism and the possibility of adapting in America lasts very long and not always migrants receive a reasoned refusal. Of course the migrants begin to hide from the migration service. And as a result we get a lot of illegal immigrants. Maybe it was necessary to begin not with deportation, and legalization?

Legalization of illegal immigrants will be extremely unfair to those who took the legal path. I know someone who is waiting for more than 10 years, to immigrate to the United States. He can't get his visa, despite having family connections in the United States.

That means he is just a economic migrant with low/no education and bad job experience.
If  that would not be the case he would have already been accepted through the green/blue card program or as a refugee if he comes from a warzone.

If he has family who is legal in the US they can get him easily to the us. They just need to earn enough money.
And if they are husbands/parents it is becoming even more easy.

Not true.

Going through the legal process can easily take 10-14 years.

[Sithara007]

Not true.

Going through the legal process can easily take 10-14 years.

That is correct. Your educational qualifications and skills doesn't matter. You need to spend a fortune in verifying your educational certifications and proving that you will not become a welfare rat once you arrive in the US.

[Spendulus]

Not true.

Going through the legal process can easily take 10-14 years.

That is correct. Your educational qualifications and skills doesn't matter. You need to spend a fortune in verifying your educational certifications and proving that you will not become a welfare rat once you arrive in the US.

Bolded part, those I have helped with the citizenship process, for them that was not true.  Although it was certainly a hassle to get proof of education.  I guess that could vary with the nation of origin.

[bryant.coleman]

Not true.

Going through the legal process can easily take 10-14 years.

Now if you treat someone who waited for 14 years to immigrate, and someone who broke the law and crossed the border as equals, then it is going to be extremely unfair to the former person. The Democrat politicians have been encouraging illegal immigration for the past many decades and this is directly responsible for the sad state of affairs in the US.

[Spendulus]

Not true.

Going through the legal process can easily take 10-14 years.

Now if you treat someone who waited for 14 years to immigrate, and someone who broke the law and crossed the border as equals, then it is going to be extremely unfair to the former person. The Democrat politicians have been encouraging illegal immigration for the past many decades and this is directly responsible for the sad state of affairs in the US.

That's correct, note that they actively encourage breaking the law.

The current protest against Trump's immigration policies is a push to continue this breaking and disregard of the law.  Which means Trump doesn't need any legislation to do what he promised.

There are a number of problems with illegal immigration, notably categories of people who are barred from entry, such as those with contagious tuberculosis, sneak in.  Not good.

[criptix]

Uh.
You get US citizenship easily in 1-2 years if you work in certain sectors or you invest 100k $ in an US venture (it depends on your origin too - people from the UK, Canada or germany will have it much easier as some nepalese or sub sahara african).

So no 10 years waiting time if you arent a economic migrant or refugee.

Not even talking about regular (working/staying) visas...

[Sithara007]

Uh.
You get US citizenship easily in 1-2 years if you work in certain sectors or you invest 100k $ in an US venture (it depends on your origin too - people from the UK, Canada or germany will have it much easier as some nepalese or sub sahara african).

No. It doesn't depend on your origin. It doesn't matter if you are from Somalia or Iceland. The visas are given irrespective of the nationality. And the amount is not $100K. The EB5 visa requires a minimum investment of $500,000 to $1,000,000 (depending on the jurisdiction). There are other requirements as well, such as the creation of jobs for a minimum of 10 US nationals.

[criptix]

Uh.
You get US citizenship easily in 1-2 years if you work in certain sectors or you invest 100k $ in an US venture (it depends on your origin too - people from the UK, Canada or germany will have it much easier as some nepalese or sub sahara african).

No. It doesn't depend on your origin. It doesn't matter if you are from Somalia or Iceland. The visas are given irrespective of the nationality. And the amount is not $100K. The EB5 visa requires a minimum investment of $500,000 to $1,000,000 (depending on the jurisdiction). There are other requirements as well, such as the creation of jobs for a minimum of 10 US nationals.

Please research because you either are misinformed or not informed at all.

1. It depends on country of origin, because the US has contigents.

Currently, no group of permanent immigrants (family-based and employment-based) from a single country can exceed seven percent of the total amount of people immigrating to the United States in a single fiscal year.

It behaves similar for the diversity visa program.

2. Im talking about the E-2 visa which on the low end needs 75.000$.

Edit

I researched a bit more and there is actually a huge problem with the naturalisation process. There exist a backlog of over 500.000 cases and over 350.000 are from south america and mexico.

http://newobserveronline.com/512190-backlog-us-immigration-courts/

[Spendulus]

Uh.
You get US citizenship easily in 1-2 years if you work in certain sectors or you invest 100k $ in an US venture (it depends on your origin too - people from the UK, Canada or germany will have it much easier as some nepalese or sub sahara african).

No. It doesn't depend on your origin. It doesn't matter if you are from Somalia or Iceland. The visas are given irrespective of the nationality. And the amount is not $100K. The EB5 visa requires a minimum investment of $500,000 to $1,000,000 (depending on the jurisdiction). There are other requirements as well, such as the creation of jobs for a minimum of 10 US nationals.

Please research because you either are misinformed or not informed at all.

1. It depends on country of origin, because the US has contigents.

Currently, no group of permanent immigrants (family-based and employment-based) from a single country can exceed seven percent of the total amount of people immigrating to the United States in a single fiscal year.

It behaves similar for the diversity visa program.

2. Im talking about the E-2 visa which on the low end needs 75.000$.

Edit

I researched a bit more and there is actually a huge problem with the naturalisation process. There exist a backlog of over 500.000 cases and over 350.000 are from south america and mexico.

http://newobserveronline.com/512190-backlog-us-immigration-courts/

That's not exactly the naturalization process, it's the refugee issue.  The backlog is for court hearings.  Call yourself a refugee, then you get a court hearing, but guess what?  You and your friends just overloaded the court system.  So they give you a couple years to stick around.  That's the Saul Alinsky tactic.

That's not the normal process of applying for citizenship at all.  And like anyone from Mexico is going to get "refugee status."