entire thread was deleted and a new directors cut of of facts put in place

[rudrigorc2]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=164437.20


this thread was NOT opened by me, I repeat, the original thread was by another user contains what I wrote but I repeat that thread was not opened by me.  can another user open threads using my username?!?!!?

[1715576149]

1715576149

[1715576149]

1715576149

[1715576149]

1715576149

[1715576149]

1715576149

[rudrigorc2]

the thread I DID NOT OPEN : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=164118.0

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

You did not open this thread?

This is pretty concerning. Doesn't say it's edited through.

[rudrigorc2]

I did not open that thread. Was a surprise to me too when I saw that. Because the remaining content from my post end below is the same, but the date of post and owner is not accurate.

[ThiagoCMC]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=164437.20


this thread was NOT opened by me, I repeat, the original thread was by another user contains what I wrote but I repeat that thread was not opened by me.  can another user open threads using my username?!?!!?

OMG, I'm sorry but, how old are you?!

When I split that topic, the forum put automatically your username in the new message, I don't know why but, it works that way. Because I split it right before your post (new agreement in my arrangements).

[rudrigorc2]

Im old enough to realize that erase critical information is a thing we should NOT DO when trying to defend ourselves.

[repentance]

Having moderated a few forums, I can confirm that when you thread spilt or delete the OP from a topic which has responses, the first post after the deletion/split shows as the OP.  Putting "thread split" (or OP deleted) in the title of the newly created thread helps make clear what has happened.