Julian Assange Assassinated

[pseexh]

Before accusing others he answers the accusations of his sins. Maybe they manages Russian? I now don't trust anyone. How to understand where the truth and a lie?

[1714657063]

1714657063

[PetroffVany]

Such a sensation is interesting only the first time. Now it's all over. No one paid attention to his materials. If there were no elections in America do not even noticed.

[notbatman]

"*DISTURBING* Maria Abramovic OCCULT Gala Pics- Many Clinton Backed Celebs Attending 2011"




Source: http://imgur.com/a/jg2Ii




Source: http://imgur.com/a/jg2Ii




Source: http://imgur.com/a/jg2Ii

[xeqoRameshAxueamExaqana]

about say JULIAN ASSANGE only rumor
ussualy , JULIAN ASSANGE publiish about rumor, until now JULIAN ASSANGE not publish about rumor email , succes team hilary clinton

[xhomerx10]

about say JULIAN ASSANGE only rumor
ussualy , JULIAN ASSANGE publiish about rumor, until now JULIAN ASSANGE not publish about rumor email , succes team hilary clinton

Firstly, those aren't "rumor email"; they are factual, ie.

Domain Keys Identified Mail, or DKIM, is a highly regarded email security system that can be used to independently authenticate the contents and sender of an email that uses it.

DKIM was developed and is widely deployed as an email server anti-spam mechanism, including on Gmail.com and HillaryClinton.com. DKIM-enabled mail servers cryptographically sign the emails they relay so that the recipients’ mail servers can authenticate them. DKIM has the beneficial side-effect of causing messages to become "cryptographically non-repudiable"; that is, after the email has been sent, the sender cannot credibly repudiate the message and say that it is a forgery. A DKIM mail server creates a cryptographically strong proof attesting to the authenticity of the email, which it adds to each of the headers of each email it sends. This cryptographic proof can then be tested by anyone who obtains a copy of the email


Secondly, you couldn't be more wrong.  Wikileaks is still publishing fact.  Phase three is imminent and Wikileaks has done exactly as Assange has promised.  Fortunately, Wikileaks can function quite nicely while Julian Assange has his internet access cut.

 Thirdly, you don't seem like an American, why are you gloating?  Why do you care about "succes (sic)" of "hilary clinton" when you don't even care enough to spell her name properly or capitalize it?
   

[notbatman]

about say JULIAN ASSANGE only rumor
ussualy , JULIAN ASSANGE publiish about rumor, until now JULIAN ASSANGE not publish about rumor email , succes team hilary clinton

Firstly, those aren't "rumor email"; they are factual, ie.

Domain Keys Identified Mail, or DKIM, is a highly regarded email security system that can be used to independently authenticate the contents and sender of an email that uses it.

DKIM was developed and is widely deployed as an email server anti-spam mechanism, including on Gmail.com and HillaryClinton.com. DKIM-enabled mail servers cryptographically sign the emails they relay so that the recipients’ mail servers can authenticate them. DKIM has the beneficial side-effect of causing messages to become "cryptographically non-repudiable"; that is, after the email has been sent, the sender cannot credibly repudiate the message and say that it is a forgery. A DKIM mail server creates a cryptographically strong proof attesting to the authenticity of the email, which it adds to each of the headers of each email it sends. This cryptographic proof can then be tested by anyone who obtains a copy of the email


Secondly, you couldn't be more wrong.  Wikileaks is still publishing fact.  Phase three is imminent and Wikileaks has done exactly as Assange has promised.  Fortunately, Wikileaks can function quite nicely while Julian Assange has his internet access cut.

 Thirdly, you don't seem like an American, why are you gloating?  Why do you care about "succes (sic)" of "hilary clinton" when you don't even care enough to spell her name properly or capitalize it?
    

[notbatman]

It looks like the assassination was just a rumor, we've got this RT video of him discussing current events.

https://youtu.be/_sbT3_9dJY4



edit:

Video authenticity called into question. -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1651344.msg16924134#msg16924134

[xhomerx10]

It looks like the assassination was just a rumor, we've got this RT video of him discussing current events.

https://youtu.be/_sbT3_9dJY4

 Glad to see he's alive.  Good interview too. 
Interestingly, one day later, Comey has announced today that the FBI has completed it's investigation into HRC after reviewing the 650,000 emails from Weiner's computer and has not changed the conclusions it expressed in July.  Wow.  All this only one day before the election.

[notbatman]

It looks like the assassination was just a rumor, we've got this RT video of him discussing current events.

https://youtu.be/_sbT3_9dJY4

 Glad to see he's alive.  Good interview too.  
Interestingly, one day later, Comey has announced today that the FBI has completed it's investigation into HRC after reviewing the 650,000 emails from Weiner's computer and has not changed the conclusions it expressed in July.  Wow.  All this only one day before the election.

Yeah it turns out they suspended the constitution after 9/11 the Iranian Hostage Crisis and the FBI doesn't have the authority to do anything.

Here's an early revision of the current law:

[xhomerx10]

Actually I think the constitution was suspended before that.  The US has been in a perpetual "State of Emergency" since 1979.  On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran and Obama just renewed it on Nov 3rd for another year.  Since 9/14/2001, Proclamation 7463 has been renewed yearly and was renewed Aug 30th for another year by Obama.  There was even an over-lapping state of emergency declared in 2009 for the H1N1 pandemic.  Seems there are no checks and balances for the declarations of a states of emergency.  I know I'm preaching to the choir here but anyone can review the renewals at anytime... at least until there is a state of emergency declared that requires internet kill switches to be operated.

[notbatman]

Actually I think the constitution was suspended before that.  The US has been in a perpetual "State of Emergency" since 1979.  On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran and Obama just renewed it on Nov 3rd for another year.  Since 9/14/2001, Proclamation 7463 has been renewed yearly and was renewed Aug 30th for another year by Obama.  There was even an over-lapping state of emergency declared in 2009 for the H1N1 pandemic.  Seems there are no checks and balances for the declarations of a states of emergency.  I know I'm preaching to the choir here but anyone can review the renewals at anytime... at least until there is a state of emergency declared that requires internet kill switches to be operated.

"I, JIMMY CARTER, President of the United States, find that the situation in Iran constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United States and hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat." --  November 14, 1979, Executive Order 12170

For Immediate Release
March 09, 2016
Notice -- Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran

NOTICE

- - - - - - -

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAN

On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Iran. On May 6, 1995, the President issued Executive Order 12959, imposing comprehensive sanctions on Iran to further respond to this threat. On August 19, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 13059, consolidating and clarifying the previous orders. I took additional steps pursuant to this national emergency in Executive Order 13553 of September 28, 2010, Executive Order 13574 of May 23, 2011, Executive Order 13590 of November 20, 2011, Executive Order 13599 of February 5, 2012, Executive Order 13606 of April 22, 2012, Executive Order 13608 of May 1, 2012, Executive Order 13622 of July 30, 2012, Executive Order 13628 of October 9, 2012, and Executive Order 13645 of June 3, 2013.

On July 14, 2015, the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States), the European Union, and Iran reached a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) to ensure that Iran's nuclear program is and will remain exclusively peaceful. January 16, 2016, marked Implementation Day under the JCPOA, when the International Atomic Energy Agency issued a report verifying that Iran had completed key nuclear-related steps as specified in the JCPOA, and the Secretary of State confirmed the report's findings. As a result, the United States lifted nuclear-related sanctions on Iran consistent with its commitments under the JCPOA, including the termination of a number of Executive Orders that were issued pursuant to this national emergency. Though the lifting of nuclear-related sanctions constitutes a significant change in our sanctions posture, non-nuclear related sanctions remain in place.

Despite the historic deal to ensure the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program, certain actions and policies of the Government of Iran continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on March 15, 1995, must continue in effect beyond March 15, 2016. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12957. The emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 constitutes an emergency separate from that declared on November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170. This renewal, therefore, is distinct from the emergency renewal of November 2015.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 9, 2016.

[xhomerx10]

Wow.  Multiple, simultaneous emergency orders all pertaining to Iran. 
With all these special powers bestowed on the president by the president, citizens of the US wont need to bother electing a legislative branch at the federal level.

[Dizaster2015]

And why is there no information about who sold nuclear technology to Iran. If it was Russia it is necessary to introduce sanctions against it.

[notbatman]

[tvbcof]

What if the establishment arranged a hit on Assange?  What if the British police 'stood down' during this time-frame to allow the operation to go forward?  One might notice such oddities as the police to take two hours to respond to a 'cat burglar' at the embassy even though the police station were only a block or two away.

What if the hit team double-crossed the establishment?  What if they took advantage of the police stand-down to get Assange out and on to safety?

What if, eventually, the establishment wised up and raided the embassy in a panic?  Maybe we'd see (briefly) footage of police acting like disturbed ants.

What if Ecuador was a true supporter of Assange (for whatever reasons) and would do anything necessary to help the guy?  Including, counterinitiative under the accepted narrative of events, 'cutting off' Assange's internet access.  Or the access to his rapidly cooling office chair.

Just some thoughts and hopes.

[notbatman]

Authenticity of latest RT Assange video called into question by Anonymous:

Continuing the debate about the interview…
On the 5th of November 2016, RT aired and published the Full interview of Julian Assange called “Secret World of US Election”.
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sbT3_9dJY4 )
I have the following questions:
1. Why don't we see an establishing shot of both John and Julian (both in one frame)?
2. Why is there a Morph Cut* (NOT mpeg4 artifacts) at 15:08 and another one at 18:47? (see embedded video)
3. After the Morph Cut at 18:47, Julian talks about the “attempted squeeze”. Was that really part of the answer to the “Internet Being Cut” question or was it (part of an answer to some other question) edited for “proof of life” reasons?
4. If reason for the morph cuts were that Julian had to cough or clear his voice, then why did they leave it in at 01:36?
5. At 20:55 and 22:15 you can hear a screeching background noise and then suddenly you can’t. Why has the audio been cut and edited?
6. To hide a cut, a video editor can use a shot from a different camera (for example a medium close-up shot of the interviewer). How many more cuts were made?
7. For what general purpose has the interview been edited?
8. Why did they announce and label the video as “FULL INTERVIEW” while there is clear evidence of cutting and editing?
*Morph cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6wPUtKg-Ac

[pterodactyl]

It has been 51 days and 11 hours since Julian's last proof of life.

http://assange.net

[notbatman]

"... When the bubble of secrecy finally pops, it's going to be every famous person on Earth pointing fingers and killing themselves and each other. ..." -- Anonymous

[btvlGainer]

It has been 51 days and 11 hours since Julian's last proof of life.

http://assange.net

Why kill him? Who is he? You need to understand with those who stand behind him. What's the difference who will announce information? I think that he's alive.

[BADecker]

Julian Assange Emerges In New Interview; Denies Rumors That "CIA Is Taking Over Wikileaks"

As Inquisitr reported, those pushing the theory that Julian Assange, an alleged candidate for Time's person of the year award, is missing or even dead have cited a number of seemingly strange coincidences in the past few weeks. Those include an incident in November when WikiLeaks tweeted insurance files and SHA-256 hashes that did not match previous tweets. To put it simply, this indicated to conspiracy theorists that WikiLeaks and Julian Assange were no longer in control of the Twitter account.

Another piece of evidence came from an interview with John Pilger, who claimed that it took place on October 30. But those who watched the interview noted that it had several strange points, like the fact that Assange's audio had been edited together and there were no references to current events. Regated compiled a list of all the major points cited in the conspiracy theory, including the incident of the hashes not matching and the Pilger interview.

It got to the point where on Thursday WikiLeaks urged people to stop asking for Assange 'proof of life'. "Please stop asking us for 'proof of life'. We do not control Assange's physical environment or internet connection. @MashiRafael does," the whistleblowing website tweeted on Thursday.

Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-26/cia-taking-over-wikileaks-false-assange-emerges-gives-interview-after-dinner-varoufa.