Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 01:16:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Official "Satoshi Nakamoto" Appreciation Thread  (Read 1314 times)
whiskers75 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 502


Doesn't use these forums that often.


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 03:51:50 PM
 #1

So many posts about "Satoshi Nakamoto", so let's gather them together here. Smiley

Elastic.pw Elastic - The Decentralized Supercomputer
ELASTIC ANNOUNCEMENT THREAD | ELASTIC SLACK | ELASTIC FORUM
1714137387
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714137387

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714137387
Reply with quote  #2

1714137387
Report to moderator
1714137387
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714137387

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714137387
Reply with quote  #2

1714137387
Report to moderator
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
nameface
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 04:16:38 PM
 #2

This is an interesting post by Satoshi that should be easier to find:

from: http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography@metzdowd.com/msg09964.html
#
Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Satoshi Nakamoto Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:56:27 -0800

>Satoshi Nakamoto wrote:
>> I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully
>> peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party.
>>
>> The paper is available at:
>> http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
>
>We very, very much need such a system, but the way I understand your
>proposal, it does not seem to scale to the required size.
>
>For transferable proof of work tokens to have value, they must have
>monetary value.  To have monetary value, they must be transferred within
>a very large network - for example a file trading network akin to
>bittorrent.
>
>To detect and reject a double spending event in a timely manner, one
>must have most past transactions of the coins in the transaction, which,
>  naively implemented, requires each peer to have most past
>transactions, or most past transactions that occurred recently. If
>hundreds of millions of people are doing transactions, that is a lot of
>bandwidth - each must know all, or a substantial part thereof.
>


Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe
for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section Cool to check for
double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or
about 12KB per day.  Only people trying to create new coins would need to run
network nodes.  At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the
network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to
specialists with server farms of specialized hardware.  A server farm would
only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with
that one node.

The bandwidth might not be as prohibitive as you think.  A typical transaction
would be about 400 bytes (ECC is nicely compact).  Each transaction has to be
broadcast twice, so lets say 1KB per transaction.  Visa processed 37 billion
transactions in FY2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. 
That many transactions would take 100GB of bandwidth, or the size of 12 DVD or
2 HD quality movies, or about $18 worth of bandwidth at current prices.

If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then,
sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal.

Satoshi Nakamoto
#
hazek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:06:16 PM
Last edit: April 03, 2013, 05:16:44 PM by hazek
 #3

I deeply appreciate his work, I refuse to worship him.

My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right)

If however you enjoyed my post: 15j781DjuJeVsZgYbDVt2NZsGrWKRWFHpp
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:08:12 PM
 #4

Hi Satoshi. Thank you, I made very good money with Bitcoin.
WikileaksDude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:15:51 PM
 #5

thanks satoshi for let me control my own money.. Im free!
greyhawk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1009


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:21:37 PM
 #6

I deeply appreciate his work, I refuse to worship him.

Shol'va kree!
tysat
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1004


Keep it real


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:23:36 PM
 #7

What makes this Official?  Also, why the need for another Satoshi thread?  There's been plenty of these already.
nameface
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:28:11 PM
 #8

What makes this Official?
good point
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:32:08 PM
 #9

The funniest part is that while Satoshi was thinking and created a "no trusted third party" cash system, some people are dreaming of bitcoin ... f..ing banks !!!  Roll Eyes
God help us all!!
tysat
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1004


Keep it real


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:34:57 PM
 #10

The funniest part is that while Satoshi was thinking and created a "no trusted third party" cash system, some people are dreaming of bitcoin ... f..ing banks !!!  Roll Eyes
God help us all!!

What?
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:38:24 PM
 #11

What what?
tysat
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1004


Keep it real


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:41:03 PM
 #12

The funniest part is that while Satoshi was thinking and created a "no trusted third party" cash system, some people are dreaming of bitcoin ... f..ing banks !!!  Roll Eyes
God help us all!!

What what?

Not sure of the point you were trying to make in that first post, I am not following that sentence.  Someone else please confirm that I'm not crazy because I can't understand that post.
SomeWhere
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:47:00 PM
 #13

The funniest part is that while Satoshi was thinking and created a "no trusted third party" cash system, some people are dreaming of bitcoin ... f..ing banks !!!  Roll Eyes
God help us all!!

+1 confirmed no sense.
tysat
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1004


Keep it real


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:50:45 PM
 #14

The funniest part is that while Satoshi was thinking and created a "no trusted third party" cash system, some people are dreaming of bitcoin ... f..ing banks !!!  Roll Eyes
God help us all!!

+1 confirmed no sense.

Thank you, I read it 5 times and couldn't figure it out.
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:51:22 PM
 #15

Ok, sorry, I didn't understand what the question was.

At the second post of this thread Satoshi states that he is about to create a cash system where trusted third parties are not needed.
A bank in the fiat world is a trusted third party.
A bank in the bitcoin world would still need to be a trusted third party, only such a party is not needed.
Still, some people are trying to create bitcoin banks. It's illogical, they are not needed.

I hope it's clearer now. Again, I'm sorry.
HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:53:10 PM
 #16

This is an interesting post by Satoshi that should be easier to find:

from: http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography@metzdowd.com/msg09964.html
#
Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Satoshi Nakamoto Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:56:27 -0800

>Satoshi Nakamoto wrote:
>> I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully
>> peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party.
>>
>> The paper is available at:
>> http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
>
>We very, very much need such a system, but the way I understand your
>proposal, it does not seem to scale to the required size.
>
>For transferable proof of work tokens to have value, they must have
>monetary value.  To have monetary value, they must be transferred within
>a very large network - for example a file trading network akin to
>bittorrent.
>
>To detect and reject a double spending event in a timely manner, one
>must have most past transactions of the coins in the transaction, which,
>  naively implemented, requires each peer to have most past
>transactions, or most past transactions that occurred recently. If
>hundreds of millions of people are doing transactions, that is a lot of
>bandwidth - each must know all, or a substantial part thereof.
>


Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe
for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section Cool to check for
double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or
about 12KB per day.  Only people trying to create new coins would need to run
network nodes.  At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the
network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to
specialists with server farms of specialized hardware.  A server farm would
only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with
that one node.

The bandwidth might not be as prohibitive as you think.  A typical transaction
would be about 400 bytes (ECC is nicely compact).  Each transaction has to be
broadcast twice, so lets say 1KB per transaction.  Visa processed 37 billion
transactions in FY2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. 
That many transactions would take 100GB of bandwidth, or the size of 12 DVD or
2 HD quality movies, or about $18 worth of bandwidth at current prices.

If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then,
sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal.

Satoshi Nakamoto
#

I have read this post years ago. Read it again today, I still feel good.

16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
tysat
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1004


Keep it real


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:55:15 PM
 #17

A bank in the bitcoin world would still need to be a trusted third party, only such a party is not needed.
Still, some people are trying to create bitcoin banks. It's illogical, they are not needed.

I would argue that banks are still going to be needed.  There's no way every single person is going to want to be in charge of their own wallet/funds handling, they will want someone else to do it for them.  What about loans?  There needs to be some sort of system, you can't crowd fund everything.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 06:01:38 PM
 #18

It's so much harder to steal from people when they don't hand over their money to centralized repositories. We need to nip this "be your own bank" idea in the bud before it starts to catch on.
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 06:03:07 PM
 #19

What about loans?  There needs to be some sort of system, you can't crowd fund everything.

Yes, but that system can't be fractional reserve banking, unless IOUs come into play!

I imagine that bitcoin banks would have to be so different than today's banks that I don't even know if the word "bank" would apply anymore.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!