Bitcoin Core 0.13.1 Released

[Lauda]

And again the same behavior after the 24 h Internet disconnect tonight.
I think we have to open a new ticket 

That's strange. You should open up an issue on Github. Please make sure that you properly describe your issue in the used format.

[Hanslo]

And again the same behavior after the 24 h Internet disconnect tonight.
I think we have to open a new ticket 

I have tried since Okt. 28

[Real-Duke]

Ticket is open, we will see!
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9056

[Ayers]

i want to ask something about pruning, how much time can pass before i need to resync again after pruning with a wallet?, what i mean is, if i have two wallet, and i sync first with both of them, then i do pruning with one, let's say the main one, and i prune the other again after one month, do i need to resync again?

That is not how pruning works. Pruning is not wallet specific. You will probably need to resync when you switch wallets, but I think it is dependent on how many days of blocks are kept when you pruned.

that what i was talking about, there is a way we can know how many days pass until we need to resync again after pruning? maybe some command line?

[achow101]

i want to ask something about pruning, how much time can pass before i need to resync again after pruning with a wallet?, what i mean is, if i have two wallet, and i sync first with both of them, then i do pruning with one, let's say the main one, and i prune the other again after one month, do i need to resync again?

That is not how pruning works. Pruning is not wallet specific. You will probably need to resync when you switch wallets, but I think it is dependent on how many days of blocks are kept when you pruned.

that what i was talking about, there is a way we can know how many days pass until we need to resync again after pruning? maybe some command line?

You can set how many MB of blocks you want to store. If you go by worst case scenario, one blocks is 2 MB (append and revert data) and the minimum Bitcoin Core allows is 550 MB which is ~2 days of blocks.

[Hazir]

This update is not required for my client to receive full SegWit support of bitcoin network when it will be activated in the future?
For now I am using older Core version and want to know if version 0.11 will be still supported and fully compatible.

[achow101]

This update is not required for my client to receive full SegWit support of bitcoin network when it will be activated in the future?
For now I am using older Core version and want to know if version 0.11 will be still supported and fully compatible.

You will not have full segwit support without this version of Bitcoin Core. You will not be able to take advantage of segwit's features. However, you will not be forked off of the network should you not upgrade and you will be able to spend and receive Bitcoin as you do now.

[dbstmddhks]

If you are korean

use this page to understand

http://blog.naver.com/monsterbit/220840575705

[Amph]

the issue in the previous version about the windows that let you know about your transaction movements, still isn't fixed apparently, it was missed since 0.13 version
 this
i'm talking about

[achow101]

the issue in the previous version about the windows that let you know about your transaction movements, still isn't fixed apparently, it was missed since 0.13 version
 this
i'm talking about

We haven't been able to replicate this issue. I have no problems with it on my install of Bitcoin Core on windows.

[ScripterRon]

the issue in the previous version about the windows that let you know about your transaction movements, still isn't fixed apparently, it was missed since 0.13 version
 this
i'm talking about

If you are running Windows 10, popups are disabled by default when you are duplicating the screen to multiple monitors (I have a widescreen TV as well as a computer monitor).  You can turn this off in Settings -> Notifications

[Amph]

the issue in the previous version about the windows that let you know about your transaction movements, still isn't fixed apparently, it was missed since 0.13 version
 this
i'm talking about

If you are running Windows 10, popups are disabled by default when you are duplicating the screen to multiple monitors (I have a widescreen TV as well as a computer monitor).  You can turn this off in Settings -> Notifications

"hide notification when i'm duplicating my screen"? this is already off by default, it's strange because in my other computer i get those windows with an altcoin, so it must be something else, settings are the same on both system

also i was getting the notification with the 0.12 version

this guy was also in the same boat with the previous version https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1594650.msg16084752#msg16084752

[achow101]

"hide notification when i'm duplicating my screen"? this is already off by default, it's strange because in my other computer i get those windows with an altcoin, so it must be something else, settings are the same on both system

also i was getting the notification with the 0.12 version

this guy was also in the same boat with the previous version https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1594650.msg16084752#msg16084752

It might have something to do with qt, but it's hard to know. I can't reproduce it so I can't really help you. Have you tried it on another machine to see if you see the same behavior there?

[Hyena]

As of today I am running Bitcoin Unlimited. Just say no to SegWit.
Here's what made me switch from Core to Bitcoin Unlimited: https://vid.me/kz1s

[Hazir]

I upgraded my client to ver 0.13.1 today but I encountered some problem with my antivirus - Avast.
After an upgrade when I wanted to start my wallet Avast stopped the process did a deep scan and quarantined the bitcoin-qt.exe.
Apparently bitcoin-qt.exe is infected with Dyna:BitCoinMiner-CR[PUP] - but I am pretty sure it is a false positive.

[achow101]

I upgraded my client to ver 0.13.1 today but I encountered some problem with my antivirus - Avast.
After an upgrade when I wanted to start my wallet Avast stopped the process did a deep scan and quarantined the bitcoin-qt.exe.
Apparently bitcoin-qt.exe is infected with Dyna:BitCoinMiner-CR[PUP] - but I am pretty sure it is a false positive.

Verify the hashes.

The antivirus flagging bitcoin-qt isn't new, it has happened before with other versions. And they aren't wrong about it containing a bitcoin miner, it does have one, just for testnet and regtest, not mainnet.

[Stringer Bell]

Just downloaded, installed and it's working beautifully. Thank you for the brilliant work BTCCrew. Quite a few contributors now, very cool to see.

Funny how this thread gets almost no attention compared to some of the others From reading some parts of the board, you'd wonder if Bitcoin even existed anymore. (without a healthy, regularly updated Ignore list, that is)

It's only high quality work being delivered yet again, nothing worth writing about 

[HomoHenning]

As of today I am running Bitcoin Unlimited. Just say no to SegWit.
Here's what made me switch from Core to Bitcoin Unlimited: https://vid.me/kz1s

1. unlimited will not have any chances, be realistic
2. I suppose you are a bitcoin investor and are interested in rising prices. This will happen if SegWit and later LN will be accepted
3. unlimited blocks is the easiest but worst attempt for scaling

[Hyena]

As of today I am running Bitcoin Unlimited. Just say no to SegWit.
Here's what made me switch from Core to Bitcoin Unlimited: https://vid.me/kz1s

1. unlimited will not have any chances, be realistic
2. I suppose you are a bitcoin investor and are interested in rising prices. This will happen if SegWit and later LN will be accepted
3. unlimited blocks is the easiest but worst attempt for scaling

1. I'm taking my chances, it is very important for Bitcoin to reject SegWit. If it fails we lose BTC, and it will become yet another Ethereum centralized bankstercoin
2. Yes I am a bitcoin holder since 2011 and I belive the price will rise more without SegWit.
3. Unlimited blocks is the most decentralized and best free market based attempt for scaling. I support Satoshi's original vision. If you disagree with Satoshi go ahead and create SegWItCoin as an altcoin to Bitcoin.

[Lauda]

1. I'm taking my chances, it is very important for Bitcoin to reject SegWit. If it fails we lose BTC, and it will become yet another Ethereum centralized bankstercoin

Nonsense FUD by someone who's either very misinformed or just trolling.

2. Yes I am a bitcoin holder since 2011 and I belive the price will rise more without SegWit.

Doesn't matter even if you were satoshi, this does not give you more credibility.

3. Unlimited blocks is the most decentralized and best free market based attempt for scaling. I support Satoshi's original vision. If you disagree with Satoshi go ahead and create SegWItCoin as an altcoin to Bitcoin.

No. Unlimited blocks are inherently safe. Also stop appealing to authority. Just because Satoshi created it, or had a vision, that does not mean that that is the utmost correct and perfect way to move to.