Anything on BTCJam...

[Kelticfox]

[Deleted]

[1715122625]

1715122625

[1715122625]

1715122625

[1715122625]

1715122625

[1715122625]

1715122625

[John (John K.)]

I'm still evaluating if this should belong here or Service Discussions, but I agree with your points there. Being verified on BTCJam does not mean anything at all - there is no legal ramifications, or even a simple doxing for the scammer. I've learnt to not invest anything on BTCJam since I read the TOS a long time ago. 

[John (John K.)]

I'm still evaluating if this should belong here or Service Discussions, but I agree with your points there. Being verified on BTCJam does not mean anything at all - there is no legal ramifications, or even a simple doxing for the scammer. I've learnt to not invest anything on BTCJam since I read the TOS a long time ago. 

I understand your points, but if possible, can you please leave it here?

It's intended as a warning for BTCJam and potential scamming and the fact there is no ramifications.

Yep - IMO BTCJam should change their policies to dump all data on the scammers publicly or help to pursue the scammers legally.

[squall1066]

I now, No longer use it. Tho the new update is promising, Allowing Facebook/E-bay and the like to gain proof, But still is no real link to sorting out who is actually who they say they are, I am staying away until at least 2PA or PGP signed and verified elsewhere.

[Ilikeham]

I have to wonder how many of these accounts that default have the potential to be set up by the site creators ... seriously, let a few serious guys get loans going and post lots of garbage accounts....

much more profitable than taking a cut and they obviously never pursue those who default..... wonder if this is why.

[MPOE-PR]

There's a reason they're on the suspected list.