The Woman of the Future White House

[Spendulus]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

[criptix]

The fappening is real

[Spendulus]

The fappening is real

Lol...

[Kemarit]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

[DimidoffVany]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

[anavuajna]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

and if we remember history, before bil matriarchy and a woman he was considered a leader.
In general, it is important to the political education of the person and not his sexual identity

[btvlGainer]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

and if we remember history, before bil matriarchy and a woman he was considered a leader.
In general, it is important to the political education of the person and not his sexual identity

Anyway, America lost its chance. Don't know when there will be such a case. I hope that in 4 years Hillary will come back and show what the Americans refused this time.

[Spendulus]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

and if we remember history, before bil matriarchy and a woman he was considered a leader.
In general, it is important to the political education of the person and not his sexual identity

Anyway, America lost its chance. Don't know when there will be such a case. I hope that in 4 years Hillary will come back and show what the Americans refused this time.

from jail?

[LTU_btc]

It's very big difference between Michele Obama and Melania Trump.
Michele was very active first lady, she participated in lot of social campaigns and America loved her.
Melania is beautiful women, but she doesn't looks very inteligent, she copied speech of Obama wife, and she can't speek fluently in English. She is only one of many womens that Trump had.

[Jordan23]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

and if we remember history, before bil matriarchy and a woman he was considered a leader.
In general, it is important to the political education of the person and not his sexual identity

Anyway, America lost its chance. Don't know when there will be such a case. I hope that in 4 years Hillary will come back and show what the Americans refused this time.

We refused a corporate, banked funded, globalist, warmonger that never serve establishment hack. Thanks for voting though.

[Spendulus]

It's very big difference between Michele Obama and Melania Trump.
Michele was very active first lady, she participated in lot of social campaigns and America loved her.
Melania is beautiful women, but she doesn't looks very inteligent, she copied speech of Obama wife, and she can't speek fluently in English. She is only one of many womens that Trump had.

Interesting.

I read Michelle Obama's masters level dissertation. 

It's on the web. 

She didn't strike me as very intelligent.

For that matter neither has Obama.

[Huge Black Woman]

It's very big difference between Michele Obama and Melania Trump.
Michele was very active first lady, she participated in lot of social campaigns and America loved her.
Melania is beautiful women, but she doesn't looks very inteligent, she copied speech of Obama wife, and she can't speek fluently in English. She is only one of many womens that Trump had.

Interesting.

I read Michelle Obama's masters level dissertation. 

It's on the web. 

She didn't strike me as very intelligent.

For that matter neither has Obama.

nobody elected any of the first ladies, remember that.  They're riding on the fame of their husbands. 

Regarding the trump win:  we be fucked.

[jstern]

Wow, that's the first lady. Barbara Bush was a first lady, and Laura, and now we have this.

[MWesterweele]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

Yes its trump democracy works in your country also. Just like philippines look what happen to our it is ongoing progressive. Many will happen during the purging of our beloved presidrnt. I admire them both for criticism they got from bitter person they remain strong and lovable person.

[Tyrantt]

I love it.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

In my own opinion its still a man had the leadership in nature. Its not about a gender but i still believe that there is a lot of advantage being a male President. Physically they are capable of doing tasks but easily tempted by a temptation that may affect his leadership. THey always have this aura of authority the way the react to its evironment.

Men are always more vulnerable. Think of how many men were in the "honey trap" of the KGB. I am sure that not choosing Hillary, America lost its chance.

and if we remember history, before bil matriarchy and a woman he was considered a leader.
In general, it is important to the political education of the person and not his sexual identity

Anyway, America lost its chance. Don't know when there will be such a case. I hope that in 4 years Hillary will come back and show what the Americans refused this time.

No, I don't think americans want a corrupt terorist funded ocult ill president in the white house, also just then would the  world hate you even more. I'd rather pick Jeb or the zodiac killer instead of any clinton. and now, with Trump, America has chances better than ever to come back to the world as a country that people do not hate for their nose poking in every country. Serbia remembers Clinton presents in '99.

[goldcoinminer]

Philippines and India will be greatly affected with Trump presidency, for sure the BPO industry which has been booming for the two countries will be at risk. Trump as he said will bring back the job in the US as he tells other nationalities are stealing the job.

[Sithara007]

Philippines and India will be greatly affected with Trump presidency, for sure the BPO industry which has been booming for the two countries will be at risk. Trump as he said will bring back the job in the US as he tells other nationalities are stealing the job.

No need to panic. Trump is not that interested in the IT sector. He is more interested in the manufacturing and factory jobs. Mexico and China are going to suffer. Philippines and India will not be affected much.

[criptix]

Philippines and India will be greatly affected with Trump presidency, for sure the BPO industry which has been booming for the two countries will be at risk. Trump as he said will bring back the job in the US as he tells other nationalities are stealing the job.

No need to panic. Trump is not that interested in the IT sector. He is more interested in the manufacturing and factory jobs. Mexico and China are going to suffer. Philippines and India will not be affected much.

He is anti remittance, supports surveillance and the nsa.

[Monetizer]

Philippines and India will be greatly affected with Trump presidency, for sure the BPO industry which has been booming for the two countries will be at risk. Trump as he said will bring back the job in the US as he tells other nationalities are stealing the job.

No need to panic. Trump is not that interested in the IT sector. He is more interested in the manufacturing and factory jobs. Mexico and China are going to suffer. Philippines and India will not be affected much.

I mean I don't want to be offensive to anyone or anything but manufacturing jobs are dead, I dont think trump can do anything to bring it back to how it was.

[Roger Burton]

Remember, American people decide about their president, not about the wifes or husbands of them. Trumps wife is from a different country than he is, so is reasonable she not knows the language so well. Also, we know Michele because she is the first lady for 8 years, before that she was just Obamas wife.