Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 09:51:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mandatory fees in 0.8 (and not in 0.7 it seems)  (Read 773 times)
evilpete (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 06:11:59 AM
Last edit: April 05, 2013, 06:42:56 AM by evilpete
 #1

I'm getting a lot of log noise about this in my logs:
ERROR: CTxMemPool::accept() : not enough fees 578a562743458c128144097996fc6a62e65bf6f8a7803bf5ca29325274429ad3, 0 < 10000

And looked up the transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/578a562743458c128144097996fc6a62e65bf6f8a7803bf5ca29325274429ad3

It's been in limbo for 54+ hours now.  Yes, it is a 0-fee transaction but it's small - 257 bytes.  I was under the impression that fees weren't mandatory for this sort of thing.  Sure, they'd be slow to confirm, but the backlog right now doesn't look too huge.

The odd thing is the change address is sent back to itself.  Presumably this is the work of something like the coin-control patches or another client?

If I had to guess, I'd wager the person tried to send 0.005 btc to somebody, followed by 10btc to somebody else and is wondering why it's all in limbo.. The first one has been stuck for 54 hours, the second (10 btc) for 10-ish hours so far.

Why do so many of the peers I'm connected to seem to think this is fine, but my 0.8.1's reject it out of hand?

What's going to happen to it? Some miner with ancient software will eventually pick it up? The sender will have to purge the unconfirmable tx from their wallet?  If so, that doesn't make for a great user experience..

Edit: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees

Edit: There was speculation that blockchain.info might be retransmitting these.  I could be wrong about this coming from multiple clients, it might just be one since bitcoind doesn't log tx origins from which peers.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
- Mahatma Gandhi
1715637065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715637065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715637065
Reply with quote  #2

1715637065
Report to moderator
1715637065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715637065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715637065
Reply with quote  #2

1715637065
Report to moderator
1715637065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715637065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715637065
Reply with quote  #2

1715637065
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Mike Hearn
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129


View Profile
April 05, 2013, 10:07:54 AM
 #2

It can result from people modifying the default fee in bitcoinj clients. The small output would trigger a required fee, I think.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!