Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 11:03:54 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: I'm Calling It. Current Price of 1K Bytecoins is .5 BTC  (Read 1537 times)
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 08:36:03 PM
 #21

With the massive amount of computing power being turned towards the network, and dozens of failed threads of people trying to buy Bytecoins, I'm going to speculate that most people won't part with them for any less than 1K BTE for .5 BTC.

Isn't that 70 cents per Bytecoin? Seems rather steep

If these Bytecoins take off I am selling up a big % of my crypto holdings because it's not a good sign for the future of crypto currencies. Won't be long until we have a new identical clone of Bitcoin popping up every day, with people hoping to mega mine in the first week.

no this is wrong. The market will only accept a limited number of clones. There is utility for the first clone because soon we will need alternative block-chains to soak up the capital that cant fit in the bitcoin network without pushing transaction fees so high as to make bitcoin unusable for small transactions. When bitcoin2 begins to fill up than someday there may be a market for bitcoin3 but not until that time.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
xorxor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 253



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 08:55:49 PM
 #22

hate it all you want. i dont like it for keeping original diff adjustment. we can all dont like it, it would not change its spectacular debut.

price is no longer .5 per 1000.  its more now. I just sold out a quite large wallet and buy offer was much bigger.

fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 08:58:11 PM
 #23

With the massive amount of computing power being turned towards the network, and dozens of failed threads of people trying to buy Bytecoins, I'm going to speculate that most people won't part with them for any less than 1K BTE for .5 BTC.

Isn't that 70 cents per Bytecoin? Seems rather steep

If these Bytecoins take off I am selling up a big % of my crypto holdings because it's not a good sign for the future of crypto currencies. Won't be long until we have a new identical clone of Bitcoin popping up every day, with people hoping to mega mine in the first week.

This is one of the first solutions to solving the scalability problem of Bitcoins not being able to handle the possible future of competing with the massive amounts of transactions that card processors and major banks take on daily. Two separate blockchains with identical code. If people continue to trust in Bitcoins, then that should naturally transfer over to Bytecoins.
That's a horrible solution to solving the scalability problem of Bitcoins (which I still don't believe is actually a problem).  Sure, let's just create 20 different cryptocurrencies so that it doesn't block up any one of them.  Now we have 20 currencies that are incompatible with each other, 20 blockchains to run, 20 currencies to list acceptance of, 20 currencies to process, 20 currencies to build mini-economies around...

I nominate this for worst solution of the year to a problem that doesn't exist yet.

we know its a bad solution the thing is its still the best solution we have and sometimes you just have to make the best of a bad situation. all other proposals involve centralization which destroys the most important aspect of bitcoin, its censorship resistance. Inorder to allow bitcoin to scale and stay censorship resistant we will have to be willing to accept some undesirable heterogeneity, atleast that is untill someone proposes something truly novel.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!