phylogrammet
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
April 09, 2013, 02:06:01 PM |
|
We may also end up with a streak of luck and you will miss out. That is the fun of it.
What, like finding 2 blocks within 10 minutes of each other?  https://i.imgur.com/ZUmRQrG.png |
|
|
|
|
|
cdog
|
|
April 09, 2013, 02:11:37 PM |
|
Well, at 140mh/s we should be finding a block every 2 hours so I think it should even out very quickly now.
Ive got a couple rigs aimed at it, hoping for the best, because I really like the concept and execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 09, 2013, 03:28:44 PM |
|
Well, at 140mh/s we should be finding a block every 2 hours so I think it should even out very quickly now.
Ive got a couple rigs aimed at it, hoping for the best, because I really like the concept and execution.
Yes finally luck is on our side  On a side note, we just broke 140 Mhses/sec... |
|
|
|
|
spinx
|
|
April 09, 2013, 03:34:41 PM |
|
they've just gotten rather unlucky, have you guys read what pplns means? because it sounds like you expect straight pps
I think i understand the concept, but in the longterm should'nt my daily average be close to 1,8-1,9LTC even do its random distributed? Second, this is what it looks like under "My Workers", and it makes me worry that something wrong? I know that all the workers are up and running, getting blocks and all.  |
|
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
|
April 09, 2013, 03:53:05 PM |
|
they've just gotten rather unlucky, have you guys read what pplns means? because it sounds like you expect straight pps
I think i understand the concept, but in the longterm should'nt my daily average be close to 1,8-1,9LTC even do its random distributed? Second, this is what it looks like under "My Workers", and it makes me worry that something wrong? I know that all the workers are up and running, getting blocks and all. they have to find blocks in order for it to work, which it looks like finally they are. Sometimes it will be hours overdue for a block, other times they get one within seconds of finding one. It should average out yes. |
|
|
|
|
spinx
|
|
April 09, 2013, 04:00:44 PM |
|
they've just gotten rather unlucky, have you guys read what pplns means? because it sounds like you expect straight pps
I think i understand the concept, but in the longterm should'nt my daily average be close to 1,8-1,9LTC even do its random distributed? Second, this is what it looks like under "My Workers", and it makes me worry that something wrong? I know that all the workers are up and running, getting blocks and all. they have to find blocks in order for it to work, which it looks like finally they are. Sometimes it will be hours overdue for a block, other times they get one within seconds of finding one. It should average out yes. Will this affect my performance? Can i tune the settings to find blocks faster? Or is this on the serverside? |
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2013, 04:58:30 PM |
|
Something is "very" wrong with the pool. Almost 50% rejects with error: "2001, Can't create UNIX so". The hashrate of the entire pool is dropping fast.
|
|
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2013, 05:03:32 PM |
|
Now it's over 50% rejects and the pool is down to 29.86 MH/s from approx 145 MH/s when this started. I'm out for now... be back when it's fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
offbyone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2013, 05:35:31 PM |
|
its going back up. it dipped really low for all reported miners. as if pplns wasn't random enough |
|
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2013, 06:00:36 PM |
|
its going back up. it dipped really low for all reported miners. as if pplns wasn't random enough Yeah, I thought it was fixed too. I switched my rigs back and it's doing it again...  |
|
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 09, 2013, 06:35:37 PM |
|
We have some issues wirth the pool atm, we go into the code line by line and we try to figure this out. Will update asap!!
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
April 09, 2013, 07:43:57 PM |
|
Hello,
Nice pool or though it would seem. I like that you have implemented Stratum...
I tried it out with CGminer 2.10.4 on xubuntu, using the same 7970s with the same settings I was using at Burnside's pool... Cards were working fine,
But I kept getting these reject errors, about not being able to create "so" in UNIX or somesuch. If this sounds familiar let me know; if not i'll do it again and copy & paste the error.
I switched back to burnside, as I have been getting good returns there, just that I'm getting a larger than desirable reject percentage even over there ... I *thought* it had something to do with burnside not incorporating stratum yet -- hence why I tried your pool.
Can you help me with this? I'll go wherever I get the least rejects... thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 09, 2013, 09:35:52 PM |
|
Hello,
Nice pool or though it would seem. I like that you have implemented Stratum...
I tried it out with CGminer 2.10.4 on xubuntu, using the same 7970s with the same settings I was using at Burnside's pool... Cards were working fine,
But I kept getting these reject errors, about not being able to create "so" in UNIX or somesuch. If this sounds familiar let me know; if not i'll do it again and copy & paste the error.
I switched back to burnside, as I have been getting good returns there, just that I'm getting a larger than desirable reject percentage even over there ... I *thought* it had something to do with burnside not incorporating stratum yet -- hence why I tried your pool.
Can you help me with this? I'll go wherever I get the least rejects... thanks!
hello and thanks for trusting us! We had an attack undergoing but we managed to completely block it and its working perfectly now! You shouldnt have rejects with us now, the error you were getting was due to the attack which is blocked ! Come and give us a try ! |
|
|
|
|
IlbiStarz
|
|
April 09, 2013, 09:40:11 PM |
|
Still getting quite a few rejected shares...
|
|
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2013, 10:02:01 PM |
|
Still getting quite a few rejected shares...
Me too... More than 50% rejects with the same errors as before. The hashing power of the entire pool is still dropping off as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
BKM
|
|
April 09, 2013, 10:16:53 PM |
|
Something is "very" wrong with the pool. Almost 50% rejects with error: "2001, Can't create UNIX so". The hashrate of the entire pool is dropping fast.
Just signed up and gave it a whirl and found the same error - back to give-me-ltc until you can get sorted out....... Looking forward to the north american server too! |
|
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2013, 12:10:54 AM |
|
I've been back on for about an hour and everything appears to be good now... |
|
|
|
|
|
IlbiStarz
|
|
April 10, 2013, 02:38:17 AM |
|
Hash rate down to 25% of what it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
tal0n4
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2013, 02:53:25 AM |
|
Hash rate down to 25% of what it should be.
Yep, the pool hashrate went down to 15.21 MH/s about 10 minutes ago.  |
|
|
|
|
|
cdog
|
|
April 10, 2013, 03:03:33 AM |
|
Hope you guys can figure this out, and I will return but for now I cant spare the downtime
|
|
|
|
|
|
