Kinetic915
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:39:04 PM |
|
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers. Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why? This is my bat file: cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat. i feel like cgminer is a much larger pain in the ass then reaper. I got my 3 7950s hashing at 1800 on reaper in half the time lol ugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
spinx
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:43:50 PM |
|
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers. Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why? This is my bat file: cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat. i feel like cgminer is a much larger pain in the ass then reaper. I got my 3 7950s hashing at 1800 on reaper in half the time lol ugh Please send me some links and your settings!
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:45:08 PM |
|
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers. Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why? This is my bat file: cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat. Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot ) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 and let me knwo how it works for you
|
|
|
|
Kinetic915
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:47:10 PM |
|
using reaper: overclock core clock 1025 mem clock 1480 pwr limit +20 (for now) voltage slightly under clocked I believe at 1100
litecoin.conf
worksize 256 vectors 1 aggression 18 threads_per_gpu 1 sharethreads 32 lookup_gap 2 gpu_thread_concurrency 22976
temps are holding from 70 to 75 with 75 to 90 percent fans
|
|
|
|
Kinetic915
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:49:44 PM |
|
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers. Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why? This is my bat file: cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat. Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot ) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 and let me knwo how it works for you I was only getting about 500 per card with this :/ I'm a complete novice with cgminer I have to mess around with it a bit i think. Thanks again though
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:53:43 PM |
|
500 per card is 1500, atm you are pulling like 1128 !! (check the WU, thats the Workers Utility)
|
|
|
|
fizzmine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:01:42 AM |
|
Something is still off with the payouts it seems.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
|
|
|
|
spinx
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:04:04 AM |
|
Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot ) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 and let me knwo how it works for you I was mining with the other pool before when this one was down This is with "cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 900 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256"
|
|
|
|
skyhigh2004
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:13:23 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
|
BTC:157BZV5z5dEdEoE5KSr5D7CQGXamLpsZ7n LTC:LYCf5PnQpXCCmpR4ka3mR8DFDe5hKhTdfc MEC:MAgTT8QdhVCkgHTkUoKvs4w1TQvv3NU99v DGC:D8Ubh9oYTpSe1HEBptY8wf6ZrPpj7bhkV5 FTC:6hb1VsGzkej4kSsssGA4FMnkCoVp7PLi8D PXC:PqQwQKJoYxGSVrKtVfDa5aaJVL9Yevhb2b
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:14:59 AM |
|
Something is still off with the payouts it seems.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?. That. We fucked up earlier today, with the USA server and VARDIFF I urge you to try us now and compare
|
|
|
|
ymer
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:16:39 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards
|
|
|
|
skyhigh2004
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:18:20 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards They never go above 75 C on the core and 85-90 C on the VRM's so I am not worried at all. I just wish these cards had better RAM for overclocking since I know I could squeeze a little more out of each if I could hit 1700-1800 mhz on the memory.
|
BTC:157BZV5z5dEdEoE5KSr5D7CQGXamLpsZ7n LTC:LYCf5PnQpXCCmpR4ka3mR8DFDe5hKhTdfc MEC:MAgTT8QdhVCkgHTkUoKvs4w1TQvv3NU99v DGC:D8Ubh9oYTpSe1HEBptY8wf6ZrPpj7bhkV5 FTC:6hb1VsGzkej4kSsssGA4FMnkCoVp7PLi8D PXC:PqQwQKJoYxGSVrKtVfDa5aaJVL9Yevhb2b
|
|
|
Shaban
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:27:15 AM |
|
This might have been addressed before, but I'm not going to look through all the pages... Can someone please tell me how to set up Reaper to run on wemineltc.com?
I tried setting the config file to say: host us.wemineltc.com port 80 and host eu.wemineltc.com port 3333 and host wemineltc.com port 8332
etc.
All would give me "unable to connect to server"
|
|
|
|
Kinetic915
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:34:51 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards They never go above 75 C on the core and 85-90 C on the VRM's so I am not worried at all. I just wish these cards had better RAM for overclocking since I know I could squeeze a little more out of each if I could hit 1700-1800 mhz on the memory. what is the normal ambient temp?
|
|
|
|
ymer
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:46:28 AM |
|
Well admin has been very helpful however I still think payments are off. For the time being I'll go to another pool.
I'll be checking back on this thread to see the other opinions.
|
|
|
|
frediiii
|
|
April 16, 2013, 01:01:32 AM |
|
for those who feel ripped off: everything fine here again as far as payouts are concerned. only problem was those 5 rounds that seem to have been credited to one lucky user. well for me thats less than 1 ltc loss so i can live with it (even though i would like to have it back *cough* LVGtB1HLASkR5goMFhHZR9zcwAhqxTs725 ) if your payments are off you probably skipped a round or two by hopping to another pool while this one had problems which will lower your payouts through pplns
|
|
|
|
skyhigh2004
|
|
April 16, 2013, 01:45:09 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards They never go above 75 C on the core and 85-90 C on the VRM's so I am not worried at all. I just wish these cards had better RAM for overclocking since I know I could squeeze a little more out of each if I could hit 1700-1800 mhz on the memory. what is the normal ambient temp? I live in MN so right now its cold outside and easy to keep my ambient at 66-67 F. In the summer I have free electricity so its also pretty easy to keep it at ~67 F.
|
BTC:157BZV5z5dEdEoE5KSr5D7CQGXamLpsZ7n LTC:LYCf5PnQpXCCmpR4ka3mR8DFDe5hKhTdfc MEC:MAgTT8QdhVCkgHTkUoKvs4w1TQvv3NU99v DGC:D8Ubh9oYTpSe1HEBptY8wf6ZrPpj7bhkV5 FTC:6hb1VsGzkej4kSsssGA4FMnkCoVp7PLi8D PXC:PqQwQKJoYxGSVrKtVfDa5aaJVL9Yevhb2b
|
|
|
richard_dein
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 16, 2013, 02:22:55 AM |
|
Ah, the envy... I run linux so there's already a speed discount, and I have to tune things down because the place I live is quite hot. My 7950's run at ~510kh/s each. I need full ventilation and an external fan to maintain 27-28C ambient and 72-3C core, while running 925/1156 with -10% power tune...
|
|
|
|
ljackstar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2013, 05:18:01 AM |
|
I had been mining on notroll.in using easyltc until today, and now I can't get it to run with wemineltc.com? Does anyone know what if I need to do anything different to setup? I also tried using cgminer with the .bat file that was created but I was only getting 50khashs/s, when I normally get 380khashs/s
|
|
|
|
peewee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2013, 05:53:11 AM |
|
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
I have a large array of 7950's as well and my settings are basically the same...I've found benefits of being a little higher with gpu engine clocks when temps allow 1125...my concurrency is exactly this as well as worksize and intensity. 500 would be about right with such conservative gpu settings as was posted earlier. More importantlyPlease somebody address the payout issue...I'm still below half of my expected payout after 10 blocks...this is well beyond my ramp up time in the past and its stabilized low. I wonder is your code splitting with the added servers now and not calculating payout correctly?
|
|
|
|
|