|
BlackFlag
|
 |
May 06, 2013, 09:00:02 AM |
|
what about the update? is it done ?
|
...
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
May 06, 2013, 09:53:59 AM |
|
what about the update? is it done ?
Update not done atm, we still testing the waters on beta phase, but we are sure you gonna love it  On a side note, 1.6 GHses and growing... |
|
|
|
|
BlackFlag
|
|
May 06, 2013, 10:01:33 AM |
|
what about the update? is it done ?
Update not done atm, we still testing the waters on beta phase, but we are sure you gonna love it On a side note, 1.6 GHses and growing... is with the update the password recovery fixed? |
...
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
May 06, 2013, 10:06:33 AM |
|
what about the update? is it done ?
Update not done atm, we still testing the waters on beta phase, but we are sure you gonna love it On a side note, 1.6 GHses and growing... is with the update the password recovery fixed? we working on that also! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ampbuster
|
|
May 06, 2013, 12:26:55 PM |
|
 Something's wrong... |
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
May 06, 2013, 12:57:09 PM
Last edit: May 06, 2013, 02:18:46 PM by WeTradeCoins |
|
Something's wrong... Looked into it and we fixed it TOO MANY BLOCKS =D =D |
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
May 06, 2013, 02:12:05 PM |
|
There was an issue with payments not executed, its been fixed All funds seemed sent but not on your wallet--> should be in your wallet now KEEP BRINGING THOSE BLOCKS!!  |
|
|
|
|
Protagonus
|
|
May 06, 2013, 03:43:20 PM |
|
Great Job with updates on news and such!
I just wanted to pass along my 2 cents, about the most recent; I'm with you on having "automatic payouts" above the .1 fee that you incur now. Since you already have a "manual payout" option, where the miner can absorb the cost him/her self. There's no reason for you to have an extra fee to absorb, when you're already giving optional rates for the mining itself. So, it's just my vote, but I hope others see the validity in reducing your overhead; what little we can help ;O.
As well, with the fee; what if you set it to .5% minimum instead of a 0% option. Further still, if necessary maybe require 1% minimum (up to 2% optional still). Not sure if this, along with the higher payout threshold will solve it all; but I would hope so.
Keep up the good work!
Thanks
Prot
|
|
|
|
|
Stoneysilence
Member
 Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
May 06, 2013, 04:01:06 PM |
|
I was using this pool as a backup but just switched over fully today. However using the US Stratum pool I was getting constant disconnects for 15-30 seconds every few minutes. I switched my main machine to the EU Stratum pool and everything is running smooth now for at least an hour.
I am in the US. My ping times for the US pool is half that of the EU one but the Stratum Proxy cannot stay connected. My laptop is still on the US pool and I can hear it going on and off every few minutes.
Still running smooth on EU servers. Afraid to try US servers again. |
|
|
|
|
kokojie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 07, 2013, 01:26:42 AM |
|
I support raising the fee, I'd like to donate 2%, but as you said the average is 0.5%, I feel if I donate 2%, others are just getting a free ride on my donation. I guess set a 1.5% fee would be the best approach.
|
btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
|
|
|
bimmerdriver
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2013, 02:46:25 AM |
|
Who is dodg_not_botnet? That is a hell of a lot of horsepower.
No comment? |
|
|
|
|
|
FloridaBear
|
|
May 07, 2013, 03:53:27 AM |
|
Nice job on the pool. One nitpicky thing though, in the "Shares Per Block" graph, shouldn't the "actual difficulty" line be plotted by using (current difficulty)/(share difficulty)? Currently this works out to about 26,000,000/76 = 342,105. Eyeballing the chart, this is right about where the "effective difficulty" hangs out most of the time. The current green line just sits at 0...something wrong there.
|
|
|
|
|
Stoneysilence
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2013, 05:25:56 AM |
|
Nice job on the pool. One nitpicky thing though, in the "Shares Per Block" graph, shouldn't the "actual difficulty" line be plotted by using (current difficulty)/(share difficulty)? Currently this works out to about 26,000,000/76 = 342,105. Eyeballing the chart, this is right about where the "effective difficulty" hangs out most of the time. The current green line just sits at 0...something wrong there.
I think Current Difficulty is the networks difficulty, not the pools current difficulty: "Difficulty - To ensure blocks are found about every 2.5 minutes, the Litecoin network adjusts this parameter every 2016 blocks which takes around 3.5 days." |
|
|
|
|
|
FloridaBear
|
|
May 07, 2013, 12:16:37 PM |
|
Nice job on the pool. One nitpicky thing though, in the "Shares Per Block" graph, shouldn't the "actual difficulty" line be plotted by using (current difficulty)/(share difficulty)? Currently this works out to about 26,000,000/76 = 342,105. Eyeballing the chart, this is right about where the "effective difficulty" hangs out most of the time. The current green line just sits at 0...something wrong there.
I think Current Difficulty is the networks difficulty, not the pools current difficulty: "Difficulty - To ensure blocks are found about every 2.5 minutes, the Litecoin network adjusts this parameter every 2016 blocks which takes around 3.5 days." I think we're saying the same thing. I may have my terminology off a bit. Basically, the green line should show the expected number of shares to find a block. It is not doing that. It is basically 0, at least on my screen  |
|
|
|
|
|
WeTradeCoins (OP)
|
|
May 07, 2013, 03:57:58 PM |
|
PASSED 2GHs!!!! THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR AMAZING SUPPORT!!
|
|
|
|
Stoneysilence
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2013, 05:01:58 PM |
|
Nice job on the pool. One nitpicky thing though, in the "Shares Per Block" graph, shouldn't the "actual difficulty" line be plotted by using (current difficulty)/(share difficulty)? Currently this works out to about 26,000,000/76 = 342,105. Eyeballing the chart, this is right about where the "effective difficulty" hangs out most of the time. The current green line just sits at 0...something wrong there.
I think Current Difficulty is the networks difficulty, not the pools current difficulty: "Difficulty - To ensure blocks are found about every 2.5 minutes, the Litecoin network adjusts this parameter every 2016 blocks which takes around 3.5 days." I think we're saying the same thing. I may have my terminology off a bit. Basically, the green line should show the expected number of shares to find a block. It is not doing that. It is basically 0, at least on my screen That is because the current difficulty is around 400 while that graph starts at 250,000. So 400 is going to look like zero where 250,000 is the first number shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
txmasut
|
|
May 07, 2013, 05:27:11 PM |
|
PASSED 2GHs!!!! THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR AMAZING SUPPORT!!
US servers are still giving around a 25% SS rate. No SS from EU servers or other pools so it's not my miners. |
|
|
|
|
mhps
|
|
May 07, 2013, 05:51:37 PM |
|
PASSED 2GHs!!!! THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR AMAZING SUPPORT!!
Still the average time to find a block is about the same like last week (~29min in the last 24hr) even the hash power has almost doubled?  |
|
|
|
Stoneysilence
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2013, 08:38:36 PM |
|
PASSED 2GHs!!!! THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR AMAZING SUPPORT!!
US servers are still giving around a 25% SS rate. No SS from EU servers or other pools so it's not my miners. I too have issues with the US servers but not the EU ones. So I just use the EU ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
