AUCTION - 8 rolls of new 0.5BTC Casascius Coins

[2weiX]

you should probably make an auction for each roll seperately and use the format the "unified asicminer orderbook" uses:


bid 28 @ roll 1
bid 27.7 @ roll 2
.
.
.
.
bid 26.5 @ roll 8

and then list the competing orders beneath your list of rolls.

i know its a hassle, but it's more transparent. I can't keep track of who bid for what.

also, no "x for any" orders.

[1714167705]

1714167705

[1714167705]

1714167705

[1714167705]

1714167705

[2weiX]

that being said:


I bid

28.50 @ #1
27.50 @ #2
27.50 @ #3
27.50 @ #4
28.50 @ #5
28.50 @ #6
26.00 @ #7
26.00 @ #8

[j_gillard]

28BTC for roll #8

[El Cabron]

28 for #2

Thanks

[Surpbitcoin]

30 BTC for roll 5 or 6

[2weiX]

#1 2weiX 28.5 BTC
#2 Goat 28 BTC
#3 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#4 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#5 Superbitcoin 30 BTC
#6 Superbitcoin 30 BTC
#7 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#8 j_gillard 28 BTC

any
28.00 BTC Severian
27.80 BTC crazy_rabbit
27.60 BTC mtbitcoin

[2weiX]

This table of course is problematic when trying to display

"X for #a or #b and Y for #c and/or #d"

[casascius]

Just so you know, roll #1 isn't substantially earlier in sequence #2. Both are 50 random selections out of the 250 or so from the lot.  The private key cutting process mixes them up quite well, so to say its truly random is fairly accurate.

[2weiX]

I guess it's just to be able to say "this is from the first batch ever"
or for the vanity-aspect of "123....."

[casascius]

I guess it's just to be able to say "this is from the first batch ever"
or for the vanity-aspect of "123....."

Yes I agree I am just saying roll #1 isn't materially better than #2 (at least without seeing which coins are in it).  They are both rolls where all coins will be 121's.

[Otoh]

28 BTC each for any 2 single rolls

[Littleshop]

28.5 for any single roll.

[PsychoticBoy]

I bid 28.8 BTC for any available roll.

[DeaDTerra]

28.6 BTC for any roll.
//DeaDTerra

[2weiX]

This bidding for any one or two rolls is really not making any sense.
also - will we be paying the amount bid by us or just the 0.1 over the second-highest bid (ala eBay)?

I bid

Roll #1: --> 29
Roll #2: --> 29
Roll #5: --> 29
Roll #6: --> 29

[Anduck]

bidding 28.7 for 1 roll which can be any

[2weiX]

overview


ROLL 1 

USER	AMOUNT
2weiX	29

 

ROLL 2 

USER	AMOUNT
2weiX	29
Goat	28

ROLL 3 

USER	AMOUNT
slakeco	27.5

ROLL 4 

USER	AMOUNT
slakeco	27.5

ROLL 5 

USER	AMOUNT
Surpbitcoin	30
2weiX	29
slakeco	27.5

ROLL 6

USER	AMOUNT
Surpbitcoin	30
2weiX	29
slakeco	27.5

ROLL 7 

USER	AMOUNT
slakeco	27.5

ROLL 8 

USER	AMOUNT
j_gillard	27.5
slakeco	27.5

ANY ROLL

USER	AMOUNT	ROLLS
PsychoticBoy	28.8	1
nduck	28.7	1
DeaDTerra	28.6	1
LittleShop	28.5	1
Otoh	28	2
Severian	28	1
crazy_rabbit	27.8	1
mtbitcoin	27.6	1
mtbitcoin	26	1

[casascius]

This bidding for any one or two rolls is really not making any sense.
also - will we be paying the amount bid by us or just the 0.1 over the second-highest bid (ala eBay)?

I'll avoid the bid-for-multiple-rolls in my next auction, but might preserve the "bid any roll" option (thoughts?).  This first one is a learning process for me which is why I only offered 8 rolls in this one.  Thanks for the helpful summaries you have been posting.

The amount bid is the amount I am expecting to be paid.  Just as reminder, unlike eBay, I am allowing the auction end time to be extended as long as there is bidding: after end time, auction ends 15 minutes after the last valid bid.

Just so you can get a sense for the supply beyond these 8 rolls, I expect I'll be releasing more rolls for sale, auction style, once I feel good it's going to work and once I have counted inventory and know the characteristics of exactly what I have to offer.  I'm going to also get rid of my 2011 25BTC coins (total 1000 were made).

I'm open to suggestions on end time and format.  I anticipate offering auctions for future production as well (not far out in the future, I just mean perhaps the amount of product I can make in one coin party so I can ship it out the same day)

[k99]

i bid 28.9 BTC for any roll.

[El Cabron]

30 for no 2