Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 09:22:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Most Efficient Z-Coin mining - RX460  (Read 1691 times)
mewhoyou (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 08:43:17 AM
 #1

I am running

2 RX 460 on board which gets me 200 H/s. Each card are utilizing 40w with a total of 240w for my entire system. That i feel is the most Efficient and yet most quiet card Ever! I can barely hear the card's fan with an average of 55c in an 30c environment.

Ethereum the Next Big Thing?
Kyubey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 08:49:56 AM
 #2

Requires twice more PCI-E slots and consumes twice more space
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 1718


CoinPoker.com


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 08:51:21 AM
 #3

Did you measure this at the wall ?

mewhoyou (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:11:14 AM
 #4

Did you measure this at the wall ?

yeah it was via the wall...

This is currently running in my bedroom so it is the best option possible... when I was running dual 480 my wife threaten to throw me and the miner out the room ... Smiley

Ethereum the Next Big Thing?
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 1718


CoinPoker.com


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:15:49 AM
 #5

Did you measure this at the wall ?

yeah it was via the wall...

This is currently running in my bedroom so it is the best option possible... when I was running dual 480 my wife threaten to throw me and the miner out the room ... Smiley

Was it a reference 480? Because most 480 are silent.

altcoinmain
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:22:43 AM
 #6

470 pulls around 100 total and gets close to 200. Yes that makes the 460 look more efficient but you will have to build more rigs to hold the same amount of hashing power. This becomes more expensive as you have to buy CPU, Memory MB PSU for each one. 470 or 480 is a better choice for that reason alone.
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:27:12 AM
 #7

palit gtx1070 240sols with 160watt - but nicehash only ))
very cold and silent
expensive ))
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:28:37 AM
 #8

470 pulls around 100 total and gets close to 200. Yes that makes the 460 look more efficient but you will have to build more rigs to hold the same amount of hashing power. This becomes more expensive as you have to buy CPU, Memory MB PSU for each one. 470 or 480 is a better choice for that reason alone.
rx470 4gb with current available miner cannot do 200sols@100watt. No way!
rx470 with samsung 8gb ram - maybe - but with extreme luck if you find chip that can do 1300mhz@0.9v ))
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:36:09 AM
 #9

2xRX470 are doing 340sols@290W at wall, so I'm not sure if 460 is most effective.

This is my signature...
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 1718


CoinPoker.com


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:41:03 AM
 #10

The efficency will be identical to any 470/480 since its the same generation.

XPM-guru
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 03:43:57 PM
 #11

2xRX470 are doing 340sols@290W at wall, so I'm not sure if 460 is most effective.

I have 3x470@300w at the wall, whole system. 510 sol .
h311m4n
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 266



View Profile
November 27, 2016, 05:12:10 PM
 #12

470 pulls around 100 total and gets close to 200. Yes that makes the 460 look more efficient but you will have to build more rigs to hold the same amount of hashing power. This becomes more expensive as you have to buy CPU, Memory MB PSU for each one. 470 or 480 is a better choice for that reason alone.
rx470 4gb with current available miner cannot do 200sols@100watt. No way!
rx470 with samsung 8gb ram - maybe - but with extreme luck if you find chip that can do 1300mhz@0.9v ))

Meh, all my 8Gbs do 165, the 4Gb are close at 150. 200 sols may be possible if you overclock like crazy, but that means you would have free juice.
PanneKopp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 391
Merit: 250


aka ...


View Profile
November 28, 2016, 11:56:00 AM
 #13

Hi Folks,

comparing prices and hash-rates, I do believe RX470/4 is the best bang for the buck (in Europe).

 Grin PanneKopp

... please make an educated guess !
alrami
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 28, 2016, 12:31:28 PM
Last edit: November 28, 2016, 01:31:29 PM by alrami
 #14

470 pulls around 100 total and gets close to 200. Yes that makes the 460 look more efficient but you will have to build more rigs to hold the same amount of hashing power. This becomes more expensive as you have to buy CPU, Memory MB PSU for each one. 470 or 480 is a better choice for that reason alone.
rx470 4gb with current available miner cannot do 200sols@100watt. No way!
rx470 with samsung 8gb ram - maybe - but with extreme luck if you find chip that can do 1300mhz@0.9v ))

Meh, all my 8Gbs do 165, the 4Gb are close at 150. 200 sols may be possible if you overclock like crazy, but that means you would have free juice.

my rx470 with samsung 8gb ram = 197-199 Sol/s (Win7x64, last driwers, Claymore v8.0, OC 1360/2100, avr 125W)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!